The Killshot Challenge

If i had a nickle for every time he said buffoon :)

So now you show the real you flea.... At first I thought you were just a harmless troll, but here you are showing us why you were banned already once. I hope you and your multiple accounts are gone for good this time.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Polarbear

Lupo, please stay low for a while and just let FC gloat. I'm sure 1:1 you would easily take anyone on, but against their entire team's bankroll, is rather impossible.

And it's funny, suddenly everybody is full of themselves against the Indians now... Half my losses still belong to them.

---

Workin on changing that for you PB :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by thevlad

Why don't you pm the leader (me) with the names? That's the way I would have handled things after I posted on here.
.... I still don't have a pm from you

---

I PMd you with proof of you and your syndicate's cheating and got nothing but silence in return........


Still waiting.......

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by K-Dawg

They just stopped arguing so don't go and throw fire wood over smoldering ambers. It's ok to voice your opinion but your pushing the envelope and if your just trying to start drama then your no better than the "shameful fight club" who you appear to be instigating......

---

Throwing "fire wood" (firewood) over smoldering "ambers" (embers) would do little to get a fire going again. First, you would want to use kindling before "fire wood" to make sure you don't stifle the "ambers".

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Van Der Sloot

Throwing "fire wood" (firewood) over smoldering "ambers" (embers) would do little to get a fire going again. First, you would want to use kindling before "fire wood" to make sure you don't stifle the "ambers".

---

Oh oh, look out everybody, it's the grammar police!

:p:cool:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dudeman

Oh oh, look out everybody, it's the grammar police!

:p:cool:

---

Actually, more like the spelling police.

Grammar would be more concerned with usage, syntax, inflections, etc.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Van Der Sloot

Actually, more like the spelling police.

Grammar would be more concerned with usage, syntax, inflections, etc.

---

I like this guy! Welcome to the forum! How do you feel about ponies? :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Van Der Sloot

Actually, more like the spelling police.

Grammar would be more concerned with usage, syntax, inflections, etc.

---

Ambers was the correct word then? Oh wait, it wasn't and you knew it. That was a grammar correction you did with that one.

So much for that argument. I win. Next?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Van Der Sloot

Actually, more like the spelling police.

Grammar would be more concerned with usage, syntax, inflections, etc.

---

Spelling is a part of grammar, nice try though....moving on

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Flea.

Shouldn't you be out trying to r ape the women of this forum?

---

I was wondering the same thing

Bill are you out of women to ****?

May I suggest WolfAss I hear he loves skinny nerd cum

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dipstik

I like this guy! Welcome to the forum! How do you feel about ponies? :)

---

Personally just like The (Rapist) Billionaire I like to r ape ponies

And I'm just here.... Not knowing what everyone is talking about...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Flea.

I heard CJ and Gin wanted to have a threesome. Billionaire, if you're reading this, would you be interested in a threesome with CJ and Gin?

---

Why haven't you been banned yet?

He went to camp n the mountains broke back style

(Cause he's gaye and all)

Yes Capt. Gin of MW is his boyfriend. I seen the pictures!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Boom

And I'm just here.... Not knowing what everyone is talking about...

---

I'm with you there. Although, good entertainment from this thread.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Killshot-CC

Lupo's challenge garnered a lot of fun, so I thought I'd try a challenge of my own. mxz has publicly accused SAS of cheating, but hasn't offered anything to back it up. If he can't, in fact, back up his libelous statements, what should he have to do? I'm thinking he should leave the game and never return, but I'm open to suggestions.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Killshot-CC

The player wasn't an obvious cheater, but after I went through every piece of inventory, I agreed with AFed. We were faced with the same problem Twisted 1 had: the person had been reported to GREE but was still in the game. However, we got him out of the syndicate all the same, and I, personally, ticked off a few people in the process. That he would know this and still question my integrity just shows what a tool he really is.

---

Game over. Thanks for playing KS. I assume you still have as much, if not more, integrity as I and will stay true to your word.

Edit: For samurai, it was seen as honorable to commit seppuku.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mxz

Game over. Thanks for playing KS. I assume you still have as much, if not more, integrity as I and will stay true to your word.

Edit: For samurai, it was seen as honorable to commit seppuku.

---

Exactly. I do stay true to my word. And I posted that ^^^^ exactly because I want it to be known. You, on the other hand, were confirmed to have been lobbing grenades with no real target other than to try to bolster your pathetic in-game stature. I checked you out during Midtown and you had less than 66k defense. You were deemed too pathetic and too low to waste bullets on, but we threw plenty anyways on our way to locking 3rd place. I don't know why I thought your big mouth would have been backed by big stats, when it should have been clear that you suffer from little-man's disease. You never once named a single person the entire time this thread stayed up and only posted after I did what you could not do. I have absolutely no problem with it being known that after someone who wasn't such a chump as you asked us to look into a member, we took it seriously and didn't just brush it off. That's the difference between being a syndicate leader and a forum troll like you. You failed the challenge, pal. Thanks for reminding people of your ineptitude.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Killshot-CC

That's the difference between being a syndicate leader and a forum troll like you. You failed the challenge, pal. Thanks for reminding people of your ineptitude.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by thevlad

+1
We're addicted to cc.... We're not cheaters... Go whine to someone else mxz
Or get a bigger bank account .
You look up to us, like we look up to FC and the Indians ( btw great job guys)

Boom goes the dynamite ;)

---

And that makes Vlad what? The forum idiot?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Killshot-CC

Exactly. I do stay true to my word. And I posted that ^^^^ exactly because I want it to be known. You, on the other hand, were confirmed to have been lobbing grenades with no real target other than to try to bolster your pathetic in-game stature. I checked you out during Midtown and you had less than 66k defense. You were deemed too pathetic and too low to waste bullets on, but we threw plenty anyways on our way to locking 3rd place. I don't know why I thought your big mouth would have been backed by big stats, when it should have been clear that you suffer from little-man's disease. You never once named a single person the entire time this thread stayed up and only posted after I did what you could not do. I have absolutely no problem with it being known that after someone who wasn't such a chump as you asked us to look into a member, we took it seriously and didn't just brush it off. That's the difference between being a syndicate leader and a forum troll like you. You failed the challenge, pal. Thanks for reminding people of your ineptitude.

---

Ahem.

http://img5.imageshack.us/img5/221/l...ehighlight.jpg

http://img248.imageshack.us/img248/3...engehighli.jpg

At least Lupo had enough honor to quit the forums. You could learn a thing or two from him.

http://img837.imageshack.us/img837/1...retirement.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Killshot-CC

I have absolutely no problem with it being known that after someone who wasn't such a chump as you asked us to look into a member, we took it seriously and didn't just brush it off. That's the difference between being a syndicate leader and a forum troll like you. You failed the challenge, pal. Thanks for reminding people of your ineptitude.

---

So you're saying, basically, that you will knowingly "brush it off" when someone tells you to look at your crew for cheats. Unless you like the person who blew the whistle on you, then you might take the cheater issue seriously.

That is mighty tolerant of you.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dudeman

So you're saying, basically, that you will knowingly "brush it off" when someone tells you to look at your crew for cheats. Unless you like the person who blew the whistle on you, then you might take the cheater issue seriously.

That is mighty tolerant of you.

---

so anytime a troll starts lobbing accusations, we should take what they say as if it were the word of god?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dudeman

So you're saying, basically, that you will knowingly "brush it off" when someone tells you to look at your crew for cheats. Unless you like the person who blew the whistle on you, then you might take the cheater issue seriously.

That is mighty tolerant of you.

---

You're putting the emphASis on the wrong syllABle. The non chump part was somebody who inquired specifically and privately about a single player, not somebody who tossed a grenade at a syndicate with no goal in mind hoping it would stick. The chump wording is referring to the method of action, not the character of the accuser so much, though character clearly was the motivation for the method of the chump.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dudeman

So you're saying, basically, that you will knowingly "brush it off" when someone tells you to look at your crew for cheats. Unless you like the person who blew the whistle on you, then you might take the cheater issue seriously.

That is mighty tolerant of you.

---

Haha. No. I'm saying that I'd have looked into anyone no matter who said it, even if it came from someone I don't respect like mxz. The problem is mxz never, ever once provided any name. Let's say I told you you had a diminutive forum troll in your group, but I didn't provide a name. Would you know who I was talking about? Bad example. That one's too easy.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by montecore

so anytime a troll starts lobbing accusations, we should take what they say as if it were the word of god?

---

An accusation that was repeatedly brought up in private that turned out to be true, was it not?

Look, all anyone's looking for is for Killshot to own up to his words. I don't blame any one of you for trying to protect your syndicate-mate that was accused. Heck, I might have done the same if someone accused Ram2 of cheating. But I would have looked into it before proclaiming I didn't have a cheater in my syndicate and staking my game on it. It doesn't matter to me if he quits or not. I'll float on, anyway.

Integrity, it's the only thing you can't buy, steal, be given, take or give to someone. Whether Killshot has it or not, only he can show.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mxz

An accusation that was repeatedly brought up in private that turned out to be true, was it not?

---

This is correct.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AFed

This is correct.

---

I can understand disliking the way it eventually was brought up - but it is incorrect to say SAS leadership didn't have the information presented from multiple people long before it eventually came up in the forum. SAS had their chance to handle it privately and refused to do so.

There's a saying I'm particularly fond of: God will judge our enemies, we'll arrange the meeting. It was unfortunate that SAS leadership kicked us out of the private meetings.

http://www.vision-strike-wear.com/as..._498234041.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mxz

An accusation that was repeatedly brought up in private that turned out to be true, was it not?

Look, all anyone's looking for is for Killshot to own up to his words. I don't blame any one of you for trying to protect your syndicate-mate that was accused. Heck, I might have done the same if someone accused Ram2 of cheating. But I would have looked into it before proclaiming I didn't have a cheater in my syndicate and staking my game on it. It doesn't matter to me if he quits or not. I'll float on, anyway.

Integrity, it's the only thing you can't buy, steal, be given, take or give to someone. Whether Killshot has it or not, only he can show.

---

while the player in question is no longer in sas, i do not think he cheated, hacked, or glitched.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mxz

An accusation that was repeatedly brought up in private that turned out to be true, was it not?

Look, all anyone's looking for is for Killshot to own up to his words. I don't blame any one of you for trying to protect your syndicate-mate that was accused. Heck, I might have done the same if someone accused Ram2 of cheating. But I would have looked into it before proclaiming I didn't have a cheater in my syndicate and staking my game on it. It doesn't matter to me if he quits or not. I'll float on, anyway.

Integrity, it's the only thing you can't buy, steal, be given, take or give to someone. Whether Killshot has it or not, only he can show.

---

1. It has not turned out to be true. Gree has looked into the player before and nothing came out of it. The suspicions were enough to result in the player being separated from SAS until the proof is beyond question one way or another.
2. What if somebody proclaimed that all of HTC was cheating, what would your response be?
3. You have no integrity on which to stand. You've continually sought to sway the public forum on a matter, without specific claims, instead of handling it in private and providing specific claims because you're a child in a candy store crying for attention.
4. He's gone. He provided almost no value to us in Midtown. We are a clean syndicate that operates within the confines of the game and does so successfully.
5. Killshot is a respectable player and did not say he would quit the game. He asked for specifics, was provided those in private, and followed up on them.

Why is this still a conversation? It has no relevance anymore. Oh that's right, it's because yore a child looking for attention.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mxz

An accusation that was repeatedly brought up in private that turned out to be true, was it not?

Look, all anyone's looking for is for Killshot to own up to his words. I don't blame any one of you for trying to protect your syndicate-mate that was accused. Heck, I might have done the same if someone accused Ram2 of cheating. But I would have looked into it before proclaiming I didn't have a cheater in my syndicate and staking my game on it. It doesn't matter to me if he quits or not. I'll float on, anyway.

Integrity, it's the only thing you can't buy, steal, be given, take or give to someone. Whether Killshot has it or not, only he can show.

---

where did he say he would leave the game? you kind of covered that part of the post up with your mad mspaint skills. or are you so dense that you think every challenge should have identical consequences?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AFed

This is correct.

---

Actually, we don't know it to be true. We only have our suspicions until GREE takes action which they have not done.

You should have more to say AFed. Did mxz ever once have such a conversation in private with me, or was it only you who did? Did I immediately follow up and act on your pm? And did your pm to me only take place after mxz started lobbing grenades that he was never able to substantiate?

mxz, since you miss me so much, I thought I'd give you a reminder of our brief time together.

http://www.deezle.com/CrimeCity/mxz.jpg

See you soon, cupcake.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by montecore

where did he say he would leave the game? you kind of covered that part of the post up with your mad mspaint skills. or are you so dense that you think every challenge should have identical consequences?

---

In honor of the Killshot challenge, I'd like to start my own challenge. If anybody can prove the world is flat, I will drive to work tomorrow. If they can't, it's probably safe to assume I will quit the game.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by montecore

while the player in question is no longer in sas, i do not think he cheated, hacked, or glitched.

---

http://i1311.photobucket.com/albums/...ps85b3f6a8.png

Date was sent on 2/11. Still believe that?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AFed

Date was sent on 2/11. Still believe that?

---

Sure I believe it. Why'd you cover the top? You certainly didn't send me that message on 2/11. If Vlad didn't believe you, and frankly still doesn't believe you, what's that have to do with me?

I'm losing a lot of respect for you AFed.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AFed

http://i1311.photobucket.com/albums/...ps85b3f6a8.png

Date was sent on 2/11. Still believe that?

---

i never said the evidence wasnt very suspicious. early on he used cash for night club upgrades. all that stuff was only 80 days of income. i have a very specific reason that i believe him to be innocent that i wont share publicly on the forum. i also understand why it loojs suspicious and why some people think he cheated. gree is looking into it and have yet to ban him for cheating.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Killshot-CC

Actually, we don't know it to be true. We only have our suspicions until GREE takes action which they have not done.

You should have more to say AFed. Did mxz ever once have such a conversation in private with me, or was it only you who did? Did I immediately follow up and act on your pm? And did your pm to me only take place after mxz started lobbing grenades that he was never able to substantiate?

---

In fairness, grenades were lobbed from SAS too, particularly from your leader. Heck this thread was a lobbed grenade begging for a call out.

In PM you were definitely fine and got the issue resolved...nothing wrong there. I also don't think I've ever called you out personally on the forum. But when the SAS leader had repeatedly dismissed PMs from both HTC and FC (if I remember correctly), it is certainly reasonable to be frustrated, as mxz was.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Killshot-CC

Sure I believe it. Why'd you cover the top? You certainly didn't send me that message on 2/11. If Vlad didn't believe you, and frankly still doesn't believe you, what's that have to do with me?

I'm losing a lot of respect for you AFed.

---

The reason the date isnt shown is the SS wouldn't fit the whole thing. Also had the players name in it and out of respect for forum rules, I didn't post that part. Care to retract your claim of date?

http://i1311.photobucket.com/albums/...ps49798c00.png

I never said that it was to you. That was to vlad. Sorry I didn't clarify there.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AFed

In fairness, grenades were lobbed from SAS too, particularly from your leader. Heck this thread was a lobbed grenade begging for a call out.

---

Some people still aren't convinced he's a cheater. It's a judgement call and I don't hold it against anyone who wanted to give a guy whose son is undergoing cancer treatment the benefit of the doubt, especially when the only authority to know the truth hadn't convicted him. You may think it's a flaw that Vlad was unwilling to turn his back on his friend based on pure supposition. I don't. I admire him for it. I also respect that he asked me to look into any allegations of cheating, including yours, even though he knew where it could have led. If you want to hold all 60 of us men and women accountable for Vlad's actions, then I'm sure we'll all be proud to stand by him.