The Killshot Challenge

[JacksonvilleKringle]

Shouldn't you be out trying to r ape the women of this forum?

I was wondering the same thing

Bill are you out of women to ****?

May I suggest WolfAss I hear he loves skinny nerd cum

[JacksonvilleKringle]

I like this guy! Welcome to the forum! How do you feel about ponies?

Personally just like The (Rapist) Billionaire I like to r ape ponies

[Boom]

And I'm just here.... Not knowing what everyone is talking about...

[CodeX777]

I heard CJ and Gin wanted to have a threesome. Billionaire, if you're reading this, would you be interested in a threesome with CJ and Gin?

Why haven't you been banned yet?

[JacksonvilleKringle]

He went to camp n the mountains broke back style

(Cause he's gaye and all)

[JacksonvilleKringle]

Yes Capt. Gin of MW is his boyfriend. I seen the pictures!

[Dudebot121256]

And I'm just here.... Not knowing what everyone is talking about...

I'm with you there. Although, good entertainment from this thread.

[mxz]

Lupo's challenge garnered a lot of fun, so I thought I'd try a challenge of my own. mxz has publicly accused SAS of cheating, but hasn't offered anything to back it up. If he can't, in fact, back up his libelous statements, what should he have to do? I'm thinking he should leave the game and never return, but I'm open to suggestions.

The player wasn't an obvious cheater, but after I went through every piece of inventory, I agreed with AFed. We were faced with the same problem Twisted 1 had: the person had been reported to GREE but was still in the game. However, we got him out of the syndicate all the same, and I, personally, ticked off a few people in the process. That he would know this and still question my integrity just shows what a tool he really is.

Game over. Thanks for playing KS. I assume you still have as much, if not more, integrity as I and will stay true to your word.

Edit: For samurai, it was seen as honorable to commit seppuku.

[Killshot-CC]

Game over. Thanks for playing KS. I assume you still have as much, if not more, integrity as I and will stay true to your word.

Edit: For samurai, it was seen as honorable to commit seppuku.

Exactly. I do stay true to my word. And I posted that ^^^^ exactly because I want it to be known. You, on the other hand, were confirmed to have been lobbing grenades with no real target other than to try to bolster your pathetic in-game stature. I checked you out during Midtown and you had less than 66k defense. You were deemed too pathetic and too low to waste bullets on, but we threw plenty anyways on our way to locking 3rd place. I don't know why I thought your big mouth would have been backed by big stats, when it should have been clear that you suffer from little-man's disease. You never once named a single person the entire time this thread stayed up and only posted after I did what you could not do. I have absolutely no problem with it being known that after someone who wasn't such a chump as you asked us to look into a member, we took it seriously and didn't just brush it off. That's the difference between being a syndicate leader and a forum troll like you. You failed the challenge, pal. Thanks for reminding people of your ineptitude.

[AFed]

That's the difference between being a syndicate leader and a forum troll like you. You failed the challenge, pal. Thanks for reminding people of your ineptitude.

+1
We're addicted to cc.... We're not cheaters... Go whine to someone else mxz
Or get a bigger bank account .
You look up to us, like we look up to FC and the Indians ( btw great job guys)

Boom goes the dynamite

And that makes Vlad what? The forum idiot?

[mxz]

Exactly. I do stay true to my word. And I posted that ^^^^ exactly because I want it to be known. You, on the other hand, were confirmed to have been lobbing grenades with no real target other than to try to bolster your pathetic in-game stature. I checked you out during Midtown and you had less than 66k defense. You were deemed too pathetic and too low to waste bullets on, but we threw plenty anyways on our way to locking 3rd place. I don't know why I thought your big mouth would have been backed by big stats, when it should have been clear that you suffer from little-man's disease. You never once named a single person the entire time this thread stayed up and only posted after I did what you could not do. I have absolutely no problem with it being known that after someone who wasn't such a chump as you asked us to look into a member, we took it seriously and didn't just brush it off. That's the difference between being a syndicate leader and a forum troll like you. You failed the challenge, pal. Thanks for reminding people of your ineptitude.

Ahem.





At least Lupo had enough honor to quit the forums. You could learn a thing or two from him.

[dudeman]

I have absolutely no problem with it being known that after someone who wasn't such a chump as you asked us to look into a member, we took it seriously and didn't just brush it off. That's the difference between being a syndicate leader and a forum troll like you. You failed the challenge, pal. Thanks for reminding people of your ineptitude.

So you're saying, basically, that you will knowingly "brush it off" when someone tells you to look at your crew for cheats. Unless you like the person who blew the whistle on you, then you might take the cheater issue seriously.

That is mighty tolerant of you.

[montecore]

So you're saying, basically, that you will knowingly "brush it off" when someone tells you to look at your crew for cheats. Unless you like the person who blew the whistle on you, then you might take the cheater issue seriously.

That is mighty tolerant of you.

so anytime a troll starts lobbing accusations, we should take what they say as if it were the word of god?

[MattThomas08]

So you're saying, basically, that you will knowingly "brush it off" when someone tells you to look at your crew for cheats. Unless you like the person who blew the whistle on you, then you might take the cheater issue seriously.

That is mighty tolerant of you.

You're putting the emphASis on the wrong syllABle. The non chump part was somebody who inquired specifically and privately about a single player, not somebody who tossed a grenade at a syndicate with no goal in mind hoping it would stick. The chump wording is referring to the method of action, not the character of the accuser so much, though character clearly was the motivation for the method of the chump.

[Killshot-CC]

So you're saying, basically, that you will knowingly "brush it off" when someone tells you to look at your crew for cheats. Unless you like the person who blew the whistle on you, then you might take the cheater issue seriously.

That is mighty tolerant of you.

Haha. No. I'm saying that I'd have looked into anyone no matter who said it, even if it came from someone I don't respect like mxz. The problem is mxz never, ever once provided any name. Let's say I told you you had a diminutive forum troll in your group, but I didn't provide a name. Would you know who I was talking about? Bad example. That one's too easy.