The Killshot Challenge

[montecore]

You're certainly entitled to your own opinion and I've never suggested anything to the contrary. But not to your own math. If you're gonna say it holds up, show the math. If you can't, I have nothing more to say in this matter.

Jesus Christ. I guess I need to see if he's still in my mafia, look at his inventory, find every item buried in his inventory that could be questionable, look up the price of each item, multiply each price by each item, add it all up, then take his IPH, multiply it by 24, and then show you that it would take ~80 days of full collections to buy all that stuff.

Then you'll probably ask when he had that IPH, what upgrades he paid for, claim that no one can collect 100% (which is true, so we can say 100 days of most collections, or 160 days of 50% collections, etc...

and then end result is I will have spent an hour or two of my time giving you a bunch of data you could get yourself only for you to say it isn't good enough.

I can see if the old conversations are archived anywhere.

[AFed]

24e9/4.5e6/24 = 222 days.

[montecore]

I ran into a player I reported 2,3 weeks ago for having 500+ Doomsday frags. Apparently he is legit because Gree hasn't banned him. Now I feel really bad for calling him a cheat. I am sorry, whoever you are....

I've reported a few myself, including one two weeks ago with screenshots of him building five buildings at once. Believe they're all level 10 now, as are the rest of his buildings. He constantly attacks me, robs my NCs every night and still haven't been banned. I used to hit him back but then he deleted his level 10 night clubs, level 10 french restaurants, level 10 italian restaurants, as well as all of his other level 10 6, 3, and 1 hour buildings and replaced them with defensive buildings. He's quite good at collecting his level 10 24 hour and 12 hour buildings. I guess to maintain appearances his casinos are only up to level 6, maybe that's why Gree isn't sure if he's cheating or not.

The player we've been talking about, on the contrary, simply has a lot of cash items that he could have bought with his IPH which he says he paid for by buying cash to upgrade his night clubs. He doesn't have all level 10 buildings, he doesn't build more than one building at once, and he doesn't have 5000 frag grenades. I would expect his investigation to go a lot longer, and I also expect him to be found innocent.

But as I've said, if I'm wrong, I'll gladly apologize to all of you.

[mxz]

Then mxz who has never been part of this conversation started telling people we were all cheaters and posted that we didn't deserve winning the PvP.

Fact check time.

Double or nothing on you having to quit. Ready?

Ok here's my post about it that sent you into a tizzy:


Evidence...go...

The fine print, so it's not ambiguous.
You can keep your account if you prove (1) I claimed all SAS was cheaters and (2) I posted you didn't deserve to win PVP.

[montecore]

24e9/4.5e6/24 = 222 days.

I sure hope you put more in the support request when you reported him to Gree. Where did you get the variables from?

[mxz]

I sure hope you put more in the support request when you reported him to Gree. Where did you get the variables from?

Cost of weapons in $ / $ per hour (IPH) / Hours per Day = Days.

*assuming perfect collections

[montecore]

You still need to provide evidence that Killshot stated he would quit, rather than just your implication that because Lupo's challenge involved Lupo quitting, than Killshot's challenge would simply have to include him quitting as well.

Second, anyone who has read this thread or any number of your posts is well aware that you calling anyone out for being "specific in [their] wording" and "word-smithing" should be an academic definition of the pot calling the kettle black. Your request for (1) and (2) above are prime examples; you ask for specific quotes which you know you didn't make when anyone who read your posts know that you repeatedly implied that we housed at least one cheater and further implied that as a result any success we had was tainted.

The player is out of the syndicate. It sounds like you're upset because we aren't ready to say you were right, because we aren't sure if you were. You had a bit of a victory here, and you should enjoy it. Your accusations got a player removed from a syndicate in the absence of proof that went beyond a shadow of a doubt. It sounds like you're going to insist on his guilt barring a press release from Gree declaring him innocent. Which is unfortunate, because I don't expect it to happen.

SO seriously, where did Killshot say he would quit?

[MattThomas08]

That's the problem... Gree doesn't ban cheaters. The syndicate should be responsible enough to get rid of cheaters if there's enough evidence. Most top syndicates do, but you're saying SAS doesn't?

Why did you choose to ignore the fact that he's gone from our syndicate and has been reported to Gree by us?

[Killshot-CC]

Hey mxz and AFed. What's HTC's policy on glitchers? How do you deal with people in your own syndicate who take advantage of glitches in the game to inflate their stats? You've concerned yourself with what goes on in other syndicates who have shown that they actually will expel glitchers, so maybe you could explain what you do about cheaters in your own group. You wouldn't happen to be harboring any glitchers in HTC would you?

[Ramshutu]

Hey mxz and AFed. What's HTC's policy on glitchers? How do you deal with people in your own syndicate who take advantage of glitches in the game to inflate their stats? You've concerned yourself with what goes on in other syndicates who have shown that they actually will expel glitchers, so maybe you could explain what you do about cheaters in your own group. You wouldn't happen to be harboring any glitchers in HTC would you?

We've kicked people out after we've discovered their inventory is suspicious and have tried to be careful with triple Checking inventory of new recruits.

What i would recommend is pm someone in HTC as we really take it seriously, and simply not want them in our syndicate.

If you found one, I would personally thank you.

All it would have take for this thread to die was simply not acting like your the saintly brotherhood of hacksmellers who feel physically unclean and need to take a shower at something as small as being in the same area code as someone with a jailbroken phone.

Now we all look like Wang waving idiots. Oh the humanity.

[MattThomas08]

Hey mxz and AFed. What's HTC's policy on glitchers? How do you deal with people in your own syndicate who take advantage of glitches in the game to inflate their stats? You've concerned yourself with what goes on in other syndicates who have shown that they actually will expel glitchers, so maybe you could explain what you do about cheaters in your own group. You wouldn't happen to be harboring any glitchers in HTC would you?

I wonder if others see the congruencies here. If HTC leaves the current glitchers in their group, they are going against their own assertions that they have an anti-glitching policy. If Gree takes back the gold items, will the glitchers remain? If they leave the items, will they remain? The fact that the glitchers still remain reveals that HTC is comfortable with Gree handling the situation themselves and are currently harboring those who knowingly exploited a glitch, while awaiting Gree's response.

Thank you Gree gods for your wonderfully timed irony.

[Ramshutu]

I wonder if others see the congruencies here. If HTC leaves the current glitchers in their group, they are going against their own assertions that they have an anti-glitching policy. If Gree takes back the gold items, will the glitchers remain? If they leave the items, will they remain? The fact that the glitchers still remain reveals that HTC is comfortable with Gree handling the situation themselves and are currently harboring those who knowingly exploited a glitch, while awaiting Gree's response.

Thank you Gree gods for your wonderfully timed irony.

It's actually official HTC policy to post an angry rant at anyone suggesting we harbour glitches and demand proof. Then go REALLY quiet for a week or so... Then after this we claim that we found the hacker, the other guys are still horribly wrong, there are no American tanks in Baghdad, the dog ate our scouting report, when caught red handed cheating with the girl next door assert 'it wasnt me' and that resort to the time honoured tradition of claiming "well I know you are, but what am I.

[MattThomas08]

We've kicked people out after we've discovered their inventory is suspicious and have tried to be careful with triple Checking inventory of new recruits.

What i would recommend is pm someone in HTC as we really take it seriously, and simply not want them in our syndicate.

If you found one, I would personally thank you.

All it would have take for this thread to die was simply not acting like your the saintly brotherhood of hacksmellers who feel physically unclean and need to take a shower at something as small as being in the same area code as someone with a jailbroken phone.

Now we all look like Wang waving idiots. Oh the humanity.

Wrong. This thread died long ago. Mxz necro'd this thread to attempt to prove a point in another thread, which he hijacked unprompted with previously resolved and dead accusations. Look inside your group for the gadfly.

[montecore]

It's actually official HTC policy to post an angry rant at anyone suggesting we harbour glitches and demand proof. Then go REALLY quiet for a week or so... Then after this we claim that we found the hacker, the other guys are still horribly wrong, there are no American tanks in Baghdad, the dog ate our scouting report, when caught red handed cheating with the girl next door assert 'it wasnt me' and that resort to the time honoured tradition of claiming "well I know you are, but what am I.

You are a terrible writer.

The player you guys cried about is no longer in SAS.

That being said, I still think he's innocent.

[Luciferianism]

What's SAS' policy on glitchers? Oh yeah that's right, never kick.

SAS is terrible with handling cheaters, and they've had genuine ones. As everyone can tell by reading back that they eventually got round to kicking one.

There's really no reason to take lectures from you guys, get off the high horse.