The Killshot Challenge - Page 6

GREE

DECAGAMES Forum - Powered by vBulletin
Page 6 of 16 FirstFirst ... 45678 ... LastLast
Results 76 to 90 of 227

Thread: The Killshot Challenge

  1. #76
    Banned
    Member Since
    Sep 2011
    Location
    In your hood soon
    Post Count
    390
    Quote Originally Posted by Jota View Post
    Lupo you are disgusting
    Never claimed something else. Hate me and I will be happy.

  2. #77
    Steady Scribe corbaman's Avatar
    Member Since
    Feb 2013
    Post Count
    75
    P.S. I speak 4 different languages, English is not my mother tongue obviously. See you in game, buffoon.
    Aren't you the guy who promised to delete his account in 2 days if you don't win?

    So, see you in game... Briefly.

    --

    CC: Teg / Level 171 / 79k att / 88k def

  3. #78
    Banned
    Member Since
    Sep 2011
    Location
    In your hood soon
    Post Count
    390
    Quote Originally Posted by The Billionaire View Post
    Your challenge did have a challenger.....
    I don't fight losers, trash collectors, junk food eaters, mentally challenged, dubious s&%ual identity, persons living in parents basements or waiting for food stamps, clowns, buffoons, panhandlers, and examples can continue. I let you put my challenger in what category you want.

  4. #79
    Articulate Author
    Member Since
    Jun 2012
    Post Count
    284
    I put your challenger into the one with integrity category...unfortunately we can't do the same with you


    Livin' the #smuglife

  5. #80
    Verbose Veteran Polarbear's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jan 2012
    Post Count
    766
    Quote Originally Posted by Lupo View Post
    I don't fight losers, trash collectors, junk food eaters, mentally challenged, dubious s&%ual identity, persons living in parents basements or waiting for food stamps, clowns, buffoons, panhandlers, and examples can continue. I let you put my challenger in what category you want.
    Lupo, please stay low for a while and just let FC gloat. I'm sure 1:1 you would easily take anyone on, but against their entire team's bankroll, is rather impossible.

    And it's funny, suddenly everybody is full of themselves against the Indians now... Half my losses still belong to them.

  6. #81
    Banned
    Member Since
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Sweet Sweet Murrica'
    Post Count
    249
    If i had a nickle for every time he said buffoon

  7. #82
    Newbie
    Member Since
    Feb 2013
    Post Count
    33
    So now you show the real you flea.... At first I thought you were just a harmless troll, but here you are showing us why you were banned already once. I hope you and your multiple accounts are gone for good this time.

  8. #83
    Prominent Poet sez's Avatar
    Member Since
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Metro Detroit, MI
    Post Count
    1,247
    Quote Originally Posted by Polarbear View Post
    Lupo, please stay low for a while and just let FC gloat. I'm sure 1:1 you would easily take anyone on, but against their entire team's bankroll, is rather impossible.

    And it's funny, suddenly everybody is full of themselves against the Indians now... Half my losses still belong to them.
    Workin on changing that for you PB

  9. #84
    Banned
    Member Since
    Feb 2013
    Post Count
    42
    Quote Originally Posted by thevlad View Post
    Why don't you pm the leader (me) with the names? That's the way I would have handled things after I posted on here.
    .... I still don't have a pm from you
    I PMd you with proof of you and your syndicate's cheating and got nothing but silence in return........


    Still waiting.......

  10. #85
    Banned
    Member Since
    Feb 2013
    Post Count
    42
    Quote Originally Posted by K-Dawg View Post
    They just stopped arguing so don't go and throw fire wood over smoldering ambers. It's ok to voice your opinion but your pushing the envelope and if your just trying to start drama then your no better than the "shameful fight club" who you appear to be instigating......


    Throwing "fire wood" (firewood) over smoldering "ambers" (embers) would do little to get a fire going again. First, you would want to use kindling before "fire wood" to make sure you don't stifle the "ambers".

  11. #86
    Banned
    Member Since
    Nov 2011
    Post Count
    4,193
    Quote Originally Posted by Van Der Sloot View Post
    Throwing "fire wood" (firewood) over smoldering "ambers" (embers) would do little to get a fire going again. First, you would want to use kindling before "fire wood" to make sure you don't stifle the "ambers".
    Oh oh, look out everybody, it's the grammar police!


  12. #87
    Banned
    Member Since
    Feb 2013
    Post Count
    42
    Quote Originally Posted by dudeman View Post
    Oh oh, look out everybody, it's the grammar police!


    Actually, more like the spelling police.

    Grammar would be more concerned with usage, syntax, inflections, etc.

  13. #88
    Supreme Scholar Dipstik's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jan 2012
    Post Count
    8,520
    Quote Originally Posted by Van Der Sloot View Post
    Actually, more like the spelling police.

    Grammar would be more concerned with usage, syntax, inflections, etc.
    I like this guy! Welcome to the forum! How do you feel about ponies?
    Quote Originally Posted by murf View Post
    Dippy, may be a little harsh in this thread, but he's right...
    Still mad at Bostick.

    I'll be back when the moderation is reasonable. Enjoy the forum you created, Gree.

  14. #89
    Banned
    Member Since
    Nov 2011
    Post Count
    4,193
    Quote Originally Posted by Van Der Sloot View Post
    Actually, more like the spelling police.

    Grammar would be more concerned with usage, syntax, inflections, etc.
    Ambers was the correct word then? Oh wait, it wasn't and you knew it. That was a grammar correction you did with that one.

    So much for that argument. I win. Next?

  15. #90
    Banned
    Member Since
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Sweet Sweet Murrica'
    Post Count
    249
    Quote Originally Posted by Van Der Sloot View Post
    Actually, more like the spelling police.

    Grammar would be more concerned with usage, syntax, inflections, etc.
    Spelling is a part of grammar, nice try though....moving on

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •