Sigh. I never asked for it to be free. I simply stated that increase of 8x and a decrease of .06x were not commensurate. The algorithm/methodology has to more nuanced than that. Again, this is an attempt on the part of the respondent (in this case you) to reduce my position to the point of absurdity.
I am simply suggesting that for people who spent years and thousands of dollars developing something, pulling the proverbial rug out from under them in this way is simply not kosher. Perhaps there could be a model that allows you to choose your method of attack--i.e. you can use your old "attack" or the new "hero strength." This would allow those that have already invested to enjoy the fruits of their investment and give the new people an opportunity to invest in-kind. Perhaps this is a bad idea. I don't know. I do know that the model Gree resorted to is ridiculous in that they went from alienating one portion of their customer base to doing the same thing to the other side.
Some effort? aka around the clock playing for four days! That is reasonable if you are new and/or building an account. If you have already put in this time and effort at some earlier stage, why should you be doing it all over again at this level of painstaking tedium? For the 20th time, I am not asking for free and easy. I am asking for a more sophisticated approach to this than simply a zero or a one. Gree has to be better than a binary conversation.
Once again, you miss the point that these people that were "flying" through it have already spent both time and money getting to this position to do this. There is some expectation that they should stay somewhere in that ballpark (i.e. closer than the delta between +8x and -.063x), since they paid for it. Gree needs to be better at creating solutions and not simply moving the problem to another stakeholder group.