Hope it's a mistake, but it probably isn't. Syndicate icon says next battle in 10 days, 23 hours from now, which would mean the next war would start Friday, May 31st.
Printable View
Hope it's a mistake, but it probably isn't. Syndicate icon says next battle in 10 days, 23 hours from now, which would mean the next war would start Friday, May 31st.
Yep. Terrible. And the worst 1st place prize ever.
Beat me to it i was just about post this
11 days look like this pattern no point complain
boycotts are never going to work until you boycott till they listen.
11 day break and 3 day wars? Good job GREEd on driving away your customers. It isnt even about the gold anymore but also just the unrelenting time needed to war continuously. Listening to your players? What a joke. You slap them in the faces over and over.
hahah.. for the rewards id rather be 10th than 1st.
Anybody know what the events will be
Stupid. Just stupid. One a war a month was perfect
Gree ... are you kidding me?
this is sweet. but id rather have battles every weekend
make sure you have them credit cards ready
whos butthurt?
Modern war has 17 days both started at same time.
Since both these game last war event ended together so at least no overlap.
I think it should be battle every Fri-Sun, with box, le, ltq event occuring simultaneously Tue-Thu.
gree's schedule for next war was probably planned several weeks ago. There will be no results seen from any boycott until next month.
Fight Club= 11 mil less IP than last war.
Sas= 11 mil less points than last war.
And these are merely two examples amongst all the syn's depreciated gold use.
The loss in profits from CC will be obvious to Gree. Personally, I think this would have happened whether there was an iintentional boycott or not. Schedule MW and CC wars in the same weekend and players will naturally have to chose one or the other whether gold is the issue or time.
I say kick back, relax, and watch the events as they unfold.
After all is said and done, the game is still fun. Isn't that what we're all here for?
Higher frequency of wars= less gold spent per war from all the syn's. Nobody is falling behind. Players adjust IAW their wallet, not frequency of wars. Everything "evens out" when all is said and done.
There was never a boycott, there was just a delay in time until they used the same amount of gold as they normally would have. A short period of "abstention" isn't really abstaining if you splurge after that period ends. Whoever thought of and/or participated in that and truly thought they were putting it to Gree is a complete and utter moron.
They keep complaining, but they keep spending. The only way to prove anything to Gree would be to stop spending period, but there are too many people that need to keep trying to stay number one to maintain their online pride to do that.
And 75% gold spending 2-3 times a month > 100% gold spending 1 time a month. They may not have spent quite as much as the last ones, but Gree still pockets a large sum of money from the complete idiocy of putting 10 million points between you and and the next team down the ladder.
I agree with the first part of your post as I've already said as much earlier in the topic, but I don't believe you have any idea how quickly those top syndicates can score points in a couple of hours if you think 10 million is an absurdly large lead. Those top syndicates (FC, SAS, etc) can do that in about 2 hours if they so desire.
And those teams could also seriously sit out 3-4 wars to ACTUALLY prove a point to gree and still be stronger than the teams that got 1st/2nd/3rd place while they were actually boycotting. They keep complaining about everything that is wrong with the game, yet keep handing Gree their wallet, but there is too much e-pride in being at the top to actually do anything like that.
talking about gree slaps in their customer's face. Wouldn't gold sale for the first 24 hour only be obvious enough? Do you guys don't see it or just pretend you don't see it?
whats up with peoples bums...jeeees
Nevermind.....
I am sure the teams that were involved in the "abstention" bought up gold during the sale, but just didn't use it (or use it as much as normal since some of the involved teams were putting up 200k-300k battles in the first 24 "Gold Free" hours.... another point at how much of a pointless joke this was) until the 24 hours was up.
Also gold usage doesn't directly correlate to gold purchased. Sure the top teams had less IP overall, but that doesn't mean they didn't purchase a whole ton in anticipation of using more.
Will not be buying gold every 10 days or for that matter ever again. I will play for free and when that stops becoming fun I will delete the game. MW was screwed up at the beginning of battle and It has been deleted from my system. I hope the suckers who fall for this go bankrupt.
I was just about to post this too. this is ridiculous.
I will never understand why gold buyers are called suckers, etc. No one knows their individual situations. Everyone wastes money on something...I think those guys who spend $500 / bottle on Grey Goose so they can get a table in a club are insane. How about spending $12/pack of cigarettes and smoking 2 packs a day? How about upgrading to iPhone 5, when you just upgraded to the iPhone 4s? Starbucks coffee every day (that's an extra $1-4 day x's 365 days)? I could go on for days.....
If everyone honestly looks at how they spend money, I'm sure you can all say, why did I spend money on that? So stop judging.
http://www.favething.com/uploads/ima...rge_best-1.jpg
George Best is rolling in his grave
Why can't they have a war during the week? The weekend is not good for me. I hate these two week wars because it doesn't give me enough time to increase my attk/def.
I wonder how long everything will continue to function for the most part over the next couple months, I just can't help but to be compelled.
If they paid some college student 15-20k a year to mod the forums and listen to customers they're ROI would be huge. Business is just run terribly.
I have a feeling that Gree knows the writing is on the wall as far as the end of this game. That's why they've been completing ignoring the player base and pumping out event after event after event, usually more than one event at a time. I can't imagine that this type of business model can be sustained long term - unless the heavy spenders in this game are so addicted or have such a huge sunk cost factor that they continue feeding into Gree's game plan. It should be apparent to everyone that Gree's primary focus is sqeezing as much money as it can from players while it can. The 24 hour gold sale Gree had at the beginning of the past war was a big FU to those who threatened a boycott. There was no posts or comments from Gree as to the reasoning of the limited sale period. For that matter, Gree doesn't have to say anything with respect to the game because it knows people will keep spending money on gold. Notice how the only time you see a post from a Gree representative is to penalize someone? At least when CM Mark was around, he gave at least SOME feedback, albeit minimal, as to what was going on behind closed doors.
Remember when the M4A1 rifle was nerfed because of "balance" issues? lol This game has completely become gold-centric with absolutely no concern for balance. The stronger (i.e. those who buy gold) continue to get stronger, further widening the gap with casual players. As long as you choose (yes it's a choice) to keep spending gold on this game, regardless of whatever issues you might have with it, Gree has no incentive to change anything.