Where does this ridiculous argument stem from? You don't control FC's cost. FC controls their own costs. You control their cost as much as Rogues controls your cost and the rest of the top 10 control our costs. Sure we could push the IP up to 60 mil every battle and fight over 1st every battle, but we haven't done that because we are all controlling how much we want to spend. Nobody else.Originally Posted by SilentAssassin
Now the famous top 3 leader that puts up 75 k ip speaks. Recently he did 300 k ip once and now he is a god.
We have fielded every statement you have made in other threads. Please take out your reading glasses MattThomas and have fun. This thread was made to help the people that were wronged by Lizzy. The whole forum knows Lizzy actually left SAS, put her people (only 20) in RG2 while she ditched them to go to RG1 and get a better prize. Please stop bringing this issue up and let us just reward the people with a good prize. Now you are making your own syndicate look bad, you don't need rastas or whatever his name is to do it for you, now you are in control! oh mighty one MattThomas
*Silent Assassins are Recruiting*
SAS1: 500k+T1+Full Streaks+Undefeated Last War
SASII: 275k+T3&4+Full Streaks+Undefeated Last War
SASIII: 125K+T10+Wins
SAS4: T50
We have a spot for almost every type of player out there
wow i can find so many things wrong with what you just said I dont even have to point them out, the people of the forum are logical enough to know SAS dictates what FC spends. Sounds like you just got out of bed and need a fresh cup of coffee before coming to post.
BTW RG cant beat SAS. We dare you to try. Push the score again, get burned yet again and still end up 3rd place. Then build RG3 for more exhausted players (llike RG2 aka Rogue Alliance) that you have destroyed trying to beat SAS while you put up 75 k ip and your top players put up 3 million-5 million.
*Silent Assassins are Recruiting*
SAS1: 500k+T1+Full Streaks+Undefeated Last War
SASII: 275k+T3&4+Full Streaks+Undefeated Last War
SASIII: 125K+T10+Wins
SAS4: T50
We have a spot for almost every type of player out there
I fully expected Lizzy to play out the weekend with the teams as they were, and to leave Monday afternoon after prizes were awarded. I may even have a screenshot of her claiming she would do just that. No one expected her to screw over all those innocent people.
We have bricks if you need them.
Because of your posting style, I'm never sure if you are serious!
My mini is in a lowly syndicate in desperate need - please don't tease us!
Last edited by VikesUK; 08-28-2013 at 06:38 AM.
She said she was bullied and that is good enough for me, and quite believable based on what I hear goes on behind closed doors at Fight Club. In any case, she was unhappy and wanted a new syndicate.here we go with the lies.... you need to talk from fact. she was not bullied, not one board member asked her to come back. fact is she has something wrong in her head. fact is you thought you could take her last minute and hurt us,fact is we knew itfact is you told lizzie you will use her for one battle 72 hours. damn i have so many facts i could give you hundreds. monte having sleepless nights!!!! in fc history we have never asked anyone to leave. lizzie told you its either her or dd, you chose dd to try and hurt fc lmao. well that didnt work did it.
bottom line is you treat you good members with disrespect. congrats.
We also know how proud you are of your little Fight Club spy network, including the one you planted in SAS and in the SAS chat rooms. Very sporting of you. You're like James Bond without the charm and a bottle of viagra.
The FACT is we asked Lizzy to be flexible. She said no. We asked what if it was just for a battle. She said no. We asked all kinds of hypothetical scenarios with a goal of getting her to agree, and she said no to all of them. Which is her right and frankly I respected her conviction. What I did not respect, nor expect, was for her to butcher the team 20 minutes before battle and hurt all those innocent players.
FC doesn't need to ask anyone to leave, it appears quite enough people are going broke, getting sick of the power structure, and leaving on their own.
Lizzy wasn't a "good member" because a "good member" would have never done this. Do you allow FC3 or FC4 leadership to dictate and veto any signings Fight Club wants to make?
Was this the woman who disbanded her husband's syndicate after he was arrested for domestic abuse? If not, please fill us in on the saga of "lizzy"!
*munches popcorn*
Still mad at Bostick.
I'll be back when the moderation is reasonable. Enjoy the forum you created, Gree.
I thought that was someone else.
This part is false. We told her the night before we weren't sure what we were going to do. We never promised her we weren't going to sign her. I was asked if we had already added her, and I said no. We were certainly hopeful of working things out with Lizzy.
And we continue to make fun of FC for having a known cheater on their team, who taught his entire syndicate to energy glitch, but of course Trev himself laughed that off as not really cheating, just a bug Gree should fix. And yes I have screenshots of that. The fact is that FC made such a compelling argument in favor of giving succubus a second chance that they convinced me. Well played, FC.-2 days before the war, SAS is making fun of FC for having a known cheater on their team (Mrs. DD).
We did hope for the element of surprise. Of course Lizzy went to Fight Club or FC got info on it through their spying network so it didn't really work out that way.-1 hour before the war, SAS accepts Mrs. DD into the group, trying to slide it by Lizzy's team without her having enough time to react.
She never said she wouldn't play out the weekend and leave on Monday. You seem to be falling for her utter lack of accountability, this idea that because "she warned us" ahead of time, she should be automatically forgiven for any and all actions taken in response to SAS adding a player she didn't like. It's BS. Any real leader would have played out the weekend and been a professional about it.-Lizzy does exactly what she says. She won't be affiliated with that cheater that SAS belittled 48 hours prior.
Why did you remove Ian's name as one of the members who signed your founding document? Why not post the document without the names redacted?-So who made the decision? Lizzy, who made it clear where she stood, or SAS, who deceived people as per usual, took advantage of a situation, didn't care about SAS3/4 and only cared about trying to get enough IP to take down FC. Glad that worked out.
This all seems so familiar...SAS taking in known hackers and not caring about the other teams...
http://i42.tinypic.com/a17gpv.jpg
http://i43.tinypic.com/2yulp42.jpg
I will say, we do seem to have a very difficult time learning how important it is to have leaders you can trust running subsidiary syndicates. It seems that whenever they are led by someone who isn't trustworthy, things fall apart.
Because there are two ways to play: Set an amount of IP for your team to score and let the chips fall where they may, or you can insist on first/second place at any cost. Go ahead and put up 60 million. You will see SAS put up 70 and Fight Club put up 80.
If the Rogues approach is to put up 35mm and not care if it is second, third, or fourth place, that is a different approach.
Completely different and unrelated situation.
So assume some of us don't know who "lizzy" is or what she did. Fill us in.
Still mad at Bostick.
I'll be back when the moderation is reasonable. Enjoy the forum you created, Gree.
SAS has spots to our abandon members in the cmk, former SAS3 and 4 syndicates.
SAS 3 and 4 are up running and feel free to pm any of SAS members in the forum and we will get u back in.
Assassins, lets have fun, gain some points and have a good time!
Gree forum is more entertaining than the Jerry Springer show a lot of the time
Posting Permissions
