Thread: happy members..

Hybrid View

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    870
    Quote Originally Posted by Sandukan View Post
    What I would say is if light moderation doesn't work and heavy moderation doesn't work how about we follow the Goldie Locks rule?
    No moderation is not an option. Months, maybe even years, of no moderation is what got us here.

  2. #2

    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    MD
    Posts
    831
    Quote Originally Posted by Clementine View Post
    No moderation is not an option. Months, maybe even years, of no moderation is what got us here.
    I was never advocating no moderation. Moderating is not all or nothing. It's a continuum.
    Goldie Locks liked her porridge not too hot or not too cold.

    I wouldn't agree that no moderation got us here. Just a few blowhards who can easily be silenced.
    This site used to be very informative and entertaining. I swear. I witnessed it.
    Always Famous......

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    870
    Quote Originally Posted by Sandukan View Post
    I was never advocating no moderation. Moderating is not all or nothing. It's a continuum.
    Goldie Locks liked her porridge not too hot or not too cold.

    I wouldn't agree that no moderation got us here. Just a few blowhards who can easily be silenced.
    This site used to be very informative and entertaining. I swear. I witnessed it.
    I believe that, and I wish I had been here during those days. We have historically been very hesitant to ban, and have instead focused on Moderation and the Infraction system. What I think you may be saying is that if those individuals were removed (or quelled), then perhaps heavy moderation wouldn't be needed.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Log in

Log in