Thread: SAS Expensive losers
-
06-28-2014, 02:06 PM #1Articulate Author
- Join Date
- Nov 2012
- Location
- The moon
- Posts
- 338
SAS Expensive losers
Was wondering if anyone could calculate how much SAS have overspent over all these wars to finish second?
Poor SAS, always the bridesmaid, never the bride!
-
06-28-2014, 02:32 PM #2Consistent Contributor
- Join Date
- Jun 2014
- Posts
- 147
Originally Posted by Brendan
They used to not overspend, but guess times are different now....
-
06-28-2014, 04:25 PM #3Steady Scribe
- Join Date
- May 2014
- Posts
- 78
I think the whole problem is the +10% influence points for top 3 every war, if it were not for that it wouldn't be TAW first and SAS second every single time... That's not really the problem we're talking about in this thread but that is part of the underlying problem of SAS, TAW, and SC getting as many points as all the other syndicates combined every war.
Originally Posted by Sleazy_P_Martini
-
06-28-2014, 04:25 PM #4Verbose Veteran
- Join Date
- Sep 2013
- Posts
- 615
wrong. sas won first place 2 wars ago. ger your facts straight Originally Posted by Gungho
[IMG][/IMG]
Leader of REDNECK ASSASSINS - recruiting for top 200wd top 100sa
349-122-589
-
06-28-2014, 04:26 PM #5Supreme Scholar
- Join Date
- Jan 2012
- Posts
- 8,520
This is a new strategy... Utter denial Originally Posted by reticlover
Still mad at Bostick. Originally Posted by murf
I'll be back when the moderation is reasonable. Enjoy the forum you created, Gree.
-
06-28-2014, 04:31 PM #6Banned
- Join Date
- Jun 2014
- Posts
- 70
king of the mugs you are Originally Posted by Dipstik
This is a new strategy... Utter denial
-
06-28-2014, 05:29 PM #7Consistent Contributor
- Join Date
- Jan 2014
- Location
- Trolling Your Thread
- Posts
- 205
Please point me to where I can see that on the map of controlled districts? LMAO..... Originally Posted by reticlover
-
06-28-2014, 07:00 PM #8Verbose Veteran
- Join Date
- Sep 2012
- Posts
- 540
Rofllllll. Pardon me. Can you please provide a screen shot to support your allegation that SAS has indeed won a battle. Originally Posted by reticlover
Take your time we can all wait.
-
06-28-2014, 07:01 PM #9Steady Scribe
- Join Date
- Feb 2014
- Posts
- 69
Lmao...u r wrong. Sas won 1st place every war. Taw is the pathetic loser every time Originally Posted by reticlover
-
06-28-2014, 07:02 PM #10Verbose Veteran
- Join Date
- Sep 2012
- Posts
- 540
Can you please quantify "heaps"? Originally Posted by 1Shot
-
06-28-2014, 07:03 PM #11Verbose Veteran
- Join Date
- Sep 2012
- Posts
- 540
LOL, Sas's new strategy. They just call themselves TAW.... Got it ( wink). Originally Posted by Don'tPostPersonalInfo:D
Lmao...u r wrong. Sas won 1st place every war. Taw is the pathetic loser every time
-
06-28-2014, 07:17 PM #12Verbose Veteran
- Join Date
- Sep 2012
- Posts
- 540
Sas as they have often said, they are not interested in winning first place, preferring to be a team were one can win the 2 nd place spot at a very reasonable price ( gold and time spent).
Have found it's far more fun to be close to the TAW score than be just above the team than wins 3rd place. Which is the team they are trying to beat.
-
06-29-2014, 12:23 AM #13Lurker
- Join Date
- May 2014
- Posts
- 18
well Originally Posted by reticlover
u r what u believe that u r
but..
if u were trully first u wouldn't have the need to say it
-
06-29-2014, 12:45 AM #14Consistent Contributor
- Join Date
- Feb 2014
- Location
- Pennsylvania
- Posts
- 142
Those guys are just chasing a ghosts. I think The Art of War is a GREE team. There's no finishing first unless you're on the payroll.
-
06-29-2014, 03:51 AM #15Master of Musings
- Join Date
- Apr 2012
- Posts
- 3,011
totally agree... sas won the first place, in the list of bums though Originally Posted by reticlover
