
Originally Posted by
dudeman
I think you did not understand that those stats were exaggerated to make a point. I doubt very much that I'm the only one who got it, but I think you missed the point and then you went on about how stupid the idea was and that such an idea could only be conceived by a non-spender. Having the ability to outspend the vast majority of your rivals does not equal intelligence, just as not having the means to spend, or deciding against spending, is not equivalent to stupidity. Maybe you should proofread posts like that before posting them.