SAS Expensive losers

GREE

DECAGAMES Forum - Powered by vBulletin
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 27

Thread: SAS Expensive losers

  1. #1
    Articulate Author Brendan's Avatar
    Member Since
    Nov 2012
    Location
    The moon
    Post Count
    338

    SAS Expensive losers

    Was wondering if anyone could calculate how much SAS have overspent over all these wars to finish second?

    Poor SAS, always the bridesmaid, never the bride!

  2. #2
    Consistent Contributor
    Member Since
    Jun 2014
    Post Count
    147
    Quote Originally Posted by Brendan View Post
    Was wondering if anyone could calculate how much SAS have overspent over all these wars to finish second?

    Poor SAS, always the bridesmaid, never the bride!

    They used to not overspend, but guess times are different now....

  3. #3
    Steady Scribe Zincincpink's Avatar
    Member Since
    May 2014
    Post Count
    78
    I think the whole problem is the +10% influence points for top 3 every war, if it were not for that it wouldn't be TAW first and SAS second every single time... That's not really the problem we're talking about in this thread but that is part of the underlying problem of SAS, TAW, and SC getting as many points as all the other syndicates combined every war.
    Quote Originally Posted by Sleazy_P_Martini View Post
    Monte told me to shut up once. I too was gonna call the FBI. But he was right.

  4. #4
    Verbose Veteran reticlover's Avatar
    Member Since
    Sep 2013
    Post Count
    615
    Quote Originally Posted by Gungho View Post
    They used to not overspend, but guess times are different now....
    wrong. sas won first place 2 wars ago. ger your facts straight
    [IMG][/IMG]


    Leader of REDNECK ASSASSINS - recruiting for top 200wd top 100sa
    349-122-589

  5. #5
    Supreme Scholar Dipstik's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jan 2012
    Post Count
    8,520
    Quote Originally Posted by reticlover View Post
    wrong. sas won first place 2 wars ago. ger your facts straight
    This is a new strategy... Utter denial
    Quote Originally Posted by murf View Post
    Dippy, may be a little harsh in this thread, but he's right...
    Still mad at Bostick.

    I'll be back when the moderation is reasonable. Enjoy the forum you created, Gree.

  6. #6
    Banned
    Member Since
    Jun 2014
    Post Count
    70
    Quote Originally Posted by Dipstik View Post
    This is a new strategy... Utter denial
    king of the mugs you are

  7. #7
    Consistent Contributor Luv4UR Mom's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Trolling Your Thread
    Main Game
    Crime City
    Post Count
    205
    Quote Originally Posted by reticlover View Post
    wrong. sas won first place 2 wars ago. ger your facts straight
    Please point me to where I can see that on the map of controlled districts? LMAO.....

  8. #8
    Verbose Veteran
    Member Since
    Sep 2012
    Post Count
    540
    Quote Originally Posted by reticlover View Post
    wrong. sas won first place 2 wars ago. ger your facts straight
    Rofllllll. Pardon me. Can you please provide a screen shot to support your allegation that SAS has indeed won a battle.
    Take your time we can all wait.

  9. #9
    Steady Scribe
    Member Since
    Feb 2014
    Post Count
    69
    Quote Originally Posted by reticlover View Post
    wrong. sas won first place 2 wars ago. ger your facts straight
    Lmao...u r wrong. Sas won 1st place every war. Taw is the pathetic loser every time

  10. #10
    Verbose Veteran
    Member Since
    Sep 2012
    Post Count
    540
    Quote Originally Posted by 1Shot View Post
    Why SAS? Taw spends heaps more.
    Can you please quantify "heaps"?

  11. #11
    Verbose Veteran
    Member Since
    Sep 2012
    Post Count
    540
    Quote Originally Posted by Don'tPostPersonalInfo:D View Post
    Lmao...u r wrong. Sas won 1st place every war. Taw is the pathetic loser every time
    LOL, Sas's new strategy. They just call themselves TAW.... Got it ( wink).

  12. #12
    Verbose Veteran
    Member Since
    Sep 2012
    Post Count
    540
    Sas as they have often said, they are not interested in winning first place, preferring to be a team were one can win the 2 nd place spot at a very reasonable price ( gold and time spent).
    Have found it's far more fun to be close to the TAW score than be just above the team than wins 3rd place. Which is the team they are trying to beat.

  13. #13
    Lurker
    Member Since
    May 2014
    Post Count
    18
    Quote Originally Posted by reticlover View Post
    wrong. sas won first place 2 wars ago. ger your facts straight
    well
    u r what u believe that u r
    but..
    if u were trully first u wouldn't have the need to say it

  14. #14
    Consistent Contributor
    Member Since
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Post Count
    142
    Those guys are just chasing a ghosts. I think The Art of War is a GREE team. There's no finishing first unless you're on the payroll.

  15. #15
    Master of Musings TZora's Avatar
    Member Since
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    3,011
    Quote Originally Posted by reticlover View Post
    wrong. sas won first place 2 wars ago. ger your facts straight
    totally agree... sas won the first place, in the list of bums though

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •