Question for the mods about TAW's hacking and the precedent set

[namedud]

That really is the question that affects every syndicate

What can a syndicate do when Gree fails to stand by their own assurances about a player being clean and Gree has the greatest resources to use when checking out a players history. gree cannot punish a syndicate for their mistakes.

It took many days, but finally the whole of the matter has been summarized in a simple statement. And this statement has been true for as long as I've been playing.

When Gree screws up they may, on a case by case basis, award players prizes that they may have obtained but were given a disadvantage through no fault of their own. Similarly, players awarded items legitimately earned will not have said items revoked should it be discovered they received the items in question due to actions or circumstances beyond their control.

[Captain Torgue]

What proof is there that sas reported that player to gree.

None whatsoever, however there is proof that SAS threatened the hacker to come back to SAS or they would get them booted from TAW. Such disgraceful behaviour. Here take a look.

[Dipstik]

You need to make a memes? Like what, milhouse pictures?

[montecore]

Why would sas have suspicions about a player who has only just left them.
And the baddad episode should not be forgotten as it's a wonderful example of what sas does to players who leave sas and go to a syndicate they don't like.

he didnt leave, he was booted. largely for the evermore sketchy things he kept bringing up in chat.

What proof is there that sas reported that player to gree.

But putting that to one side. If players do report someone to Gree for suspect game play then Gree fails to inform others that they are currently investigating that player. Indeed if gree says that account is clean Then it's Gree's fault not the syndicate who then accepts that player.

no, because he was largely banned for what he said. sas was smart enough to see what the guy was about. taw... not so much.

That really is the question that affects every syndicate

What can a syndicate do when Gree fails to stand by their own assurances about a player being clean and Gree has the greatest resources to use when checking out a players history. gree cannot punish a syndicate for their mistakes.

has gree ever rejected a player taw asked to clear? remember when gree cleared mandy's inventory, and taw actually added her with a straight face as a result?

[montecore]

None whatsoever, however there is proof that SAS threatened the hacker to come back to SAS or they would get them booted from TAW. Such disgraceful behaviour. Here take a look.

already clarified this for you multiple times in groupme, but the stupidity of your trolling, or what you call trolling, knows no bounds. he was trying to get information from him. there is no way sas would add a hacker they cut back.

[montecore]

Why would sas have suspicions about a player who has only just left them.
And the baddad episode should not be forgotten as it's a wonderful example of what sas does to players who leave sas and go to a syndicate they don't like.

yes, its the one time in sas history a player has claimed such mistreatment, which is why you keep trying to use it as a deflection even though it is over a year old. remember when the taw officers worked with baddad to have him lie to the entire community about how he was dying, and then dead, from pancreatic cancer? quite a credible guy, that baddad. guess it was wise for the taw leaders to keep you in the dark on that one.

[Tadaaah]

Locking for flame thread. Take your flame wars outside of this forum.