leeching problem solved

[King juju]

1. Preset minimums by gm that cannot be changed 12 hours before war. Giving people time to leave if they want.
2. No reward if preset minimum is not met.
3. Leeching solved.

[TagTilYouDrop]

Seems like a pretty stable way of eliminating leeching. An option to set one or not could be nice too, for those lower guilds who do not gem on the regular and if someone is busy with something else over the weekend.

[frostman27]

Yes like the ideal but lets say one of your top players puts up all but a few 1000 points shy of min and all the sudden has a serious family or work matter and is unable to Finnish putting in the minimum by the end of the war would you really like to see this player not get the prize this player may be a player that normally puts up well above minimum and and helps keep the guild strong say maybe it you do you not want the epic . Just a fault in this but do like the ideal tho

[King juju]

Yes like the ideal but lets say one of your top players puts up all but a few 1000 points shy of min and all the sudden has a serious family or work matter and is unable to Finnish putting in the minimum by the end of the war would you really like to see this player not get the prize this player may be a player that normally puts up well above minimum and and helps keep the guild strong say maybe it you do you not want the epic . Just a fault in this but do like the ideal tho

Not really our problem. If u don't meet required points you're a leech. And like he said...All major leeches use the same excuse.

[furyp]

@frostman27, leech also has family emergency problem and all kinds of bullsh it. Your top player could also be a leech.

[King juju]

Plus (in dk atleast) if I had a major issue and couldn't post last 20k points. I'd just let my gm do it for me.

[King Lou]

Leeching is a problem and if this idea was applied it would help. If you set a minimum dont make it so high that you have to be there whole war. Exp, if you require 5k per day avg. make the minimum 10k. Gives a chance in case of emergency, but also forces a leecher to either put up some tolerable number or leave before the war. Problem solved.

[Kangaroeland]

Totally agreed

[Adisty]

Instead of points earned, it could be number of attacks.

[holydinges2]

Instead of points earned, it could be number of attacks.

it could be both or a choice

like this idea it could really end leeching

[Lord Malice]

I have a hard time with leechers and my minimum requirement is just 30 attacks total for 3 day wars only... That's just 5 wars using all 6 of your attacks in the hour or for those who are busy and use gems $10 and 5 free vids. Even with this minimum of minimums I still have problems with free loaders. What needs to happen is us GM's need to be able to boot players after guild war starts... Gree takes away that function but we need to at least be allowed to remove commanders. More often then not it is a commander that coasts the entire war and not participate,only to log on and collect the reward after it's over.

[dedgod]

There is no need to argue about criteria for receiving war rewards. It should be that a GM can set a minimum number of points, or a minimum number of attacks, or both. If someone misses their minimum due to personal reasons, they just don't get the reward. There will always be another war and missing one reward isn't too big a deal. It is just a game after all.

If anything, a leeching solution should result in more spending of money for gems.

Further, I don't think anyone should feel too bad about spending some money on the game. All entertainment will cost something, and this game is more wholesome than some other forms of entertainment.

[B Legit]

There is no need to argue about criteria for receiving war rewards. It should be that a GM can set a minimum number of points, or a minimum number of attacks, or both. If someone misses their minimum due to personal reasons, they just don't get the reward. There will always be another war and missing one reward isn't too big a deal. It is just a game after all.

If anything, a leeching solution should result in more spending of money for gems.

Further, I don't think anyone should feel too bad about spending some money on the game. All entertainment will cost something, and this game is more wholesome than some other forms of entertainment.

I like how you start off by saying there is no need to argue, and then go on to present you argument..... irony....
and secondly, there will be NO solve for leeches by GREE. 1.) You are correct, more leeching means more people in those guilds have to buy more gems and make GREE more money 2.) Almost ALL guilds have long time members who have had something come up here or there during war. These are not leeches, these are people who have been with you for many wars and never had any issues. If that person has a life crisis on the last day of war and say misses a 200k req by 10k, then you'd feel like a POS for them not getting their reward they may have spent 1.5k gems on. I know that leeching sucks, we have been leeched a few times on our runs, everyone has. But due to the fact that is an infinite amount of "what if" questions that go along with it, there is nothing that will be done.

BTW: My first sentence was just poking fun, not meant to be mean, and I agree about spending money, it's not our fault those who can't afford this type of entertainment didn't get a better job/education or just choose to spend their entertainment money elsewhere

[PIMPDADDYSABER]

I would like this, but would like it to be able to be turned off so when we FTP and dont care about points it doesnt hurt some members.

[Meat Rising]

very good idea