The pros and cons of Gree awarding TAW a prize they didn't earn (finishing streaks) - Page 9

GREE

DECAGAMES Forum - Powered by vBulletin
Page 9 of 13 FirstFirst ... 7891011 ... LastLast
Results 121 to 135 of 185

Thread: The pros and cons of Gree awarding TAW a prize they didn't earn (finishing streaks)

  1. #121
    Banned
    Member Since
    May 2012
    Location
    Las Vegas
    Post Count
    1,651
    Quote Originally Posted by Faith_1 View Post
    Sorry but when my syn missed out on the next prize tier due to grees f*** up and we couldn't get in/couldn't get a match when we eventually did, we were basically told "sorry not our problem".... good to know that it's not the same rules for everyone.
    no, rules for the rich, delusional pr**s like AMG, then rules for everyone else. i am submitting a ticket to have the vest removed from my inventory. there is nothing honorable about owning it anymore.

    AMG: we know TAW was behind baddad faking cancer. his lies about it simply show the type of person he is and what little truth there is to his alleged hacking incident. he lied about dying of stage four pancreatic cancer, urged on by you, abd you expect anyone here to buy the 'baddad was hacked' rubbish?

    further, i hav screenshots almost a year old of trev gloating about having spies in sas, and how rhe fc board voted to keep it going.

    also, you still coukdnt beat us head to head

  2. #122
    Banned
    Member Since
    May 2012
    Location
    Las Vegas
    Post Count
    1,651
    art of war 3:
    after a humiliating defeat, run crying to gree to get the prize you neither earned nor deserved anyway.

  3. #123
    Actually, in previous cases of lockouts or other major verifiable interruptions during a WD event, we have either adjusted the goals if a global problem or adjusted things for the syndicates effected, regardless of who those syndicates are. The fact is that this time it was just two syndicates affected by the technical issues, but it wouldn't have mattered who it was.

    EDIT: Seriously, Montecore, tone done the flaming / trolling please. If SAS had been hit the same way by the issue, we would have done the same thing because it is completely fair to adjust the goal when it is potentially impossible to complete due to an issue on our side.
    Last edited by CJ54; 04-24-2014 at 08:40 AM.

  4. #124
    Newbie
    Member Since
    Jun 2013
    Post Count
    37
    Quote Originally Posted by CJ54 View Post
    Actually, in previous cases of lockouts or other major verifiable interruptions during a WD event, we have either adjusted the goals if a global problem or adjusted things for the syndicates effected, regardless of who those syndicates are. The fact is that this time it was just two syndicates affected by the technical issues, but it wouldn't have mattered who it was.

    EDIT: Seriously, Montecore, tone done the flaming / trolling please. If SAS had been hit the same way by the issue, we would have done the same thing because it is completely fair to adjust the goal when it is potentially impossible to complete due to an issue on our side.
    Last time, the DST (4 hr) affect cost every team, so Gree adjusted the streak from 11/11 to 10/10. This battle taw was not at 10/11 or 9/10 if similar adjustment to DST. How can you justify that?

  5. #125
    Newbie
    Member Since
    Jun 2013
    Post Count
    37
    Your phrasing of potentially impossible doesn't make sense as solemn carnage accomplished the goals. So 1 of 2 teams did it, 50% success. It is just a free gift to ONE team.
    Last edited by Ajones; 04-24-2014 at 09:03 AM.

  6. #126
    Quote Originally Posted by Ajones View Post
    Your phrasing of potentially impossible doesn't make sense as solemn carnage accomplished the goals. It is just a free gift to ONE team.
    It isn't a "free gift", it's an issue resolution, and the same consideration was also communicated to the other affected team at the time of the issue.

  7. #127
    Steady Scribe
    Member Since
    Nov 2012
    Post Count
    84
    Quote Originally Posted by CJ54 View Post
    Actually, in previous cases of lockouts or other major verifiable interruptions during a WD event, we have either adjusted the goals if a global problem or adjusted things for the syndicates effected, regardless of who those syndicates are. The fact is that this time it was just two syndicates affected by the technical issues, but it wouldn't have mattered who it was.

    EDIT: Seriously, Montecore, tone done the flaming / trolling please. If SAS had been hit the same way by the issue, we would have done the same thing because it is completely fair to adjust the goal when it is potentially impossible to complete due to an issue on our side.

    And there we have it. Thank you GREE for explaining. I had been a member of SAS when TAW received the last streak extension. I was outraged and wrote emails aplenty. Now I'm with TAW and know that if we had the four+ hours back we would have finished the streaks. The problem is not SAS nor TAW but GREE as they admit. If you can't have your servers ready to include all teams at the beginning of a war there are serious problems. GREE says they will fix them.

    I, for one, am done. The next war will be my last. The last gold I purchased (over a month ago) are the last dollars I will spend on CC. I'm quitting for the following reasons:

    1. GREE
    2. GREE
    3. GREE
    4. The never ending bitterness between TAW and SAS
    5. More tine with family; game crazy expensive

    To SAS and TAW, I only say the vast majority of you are wonderful people. I greatly admire the leadership (Diman and AM3) and the officers of both teams. But most all I urge all of you to move on and "Let It Go".

    Let it go, let it go
    And I'll rise like the break of dawn
    Let it go, let it go
    That perfect girl is gone

    Here I stand
    In the light of day
    Let the storm rage on,
    The cold never bothered me anyway ( copyright Disney)

  8. #128
    Newbie
    Member Since
    Jun 2013
    Post Count
    37
    I remember a battle earlier when at the beginning the server was down & no such message was conveyed to the affected teams that there will be an adjustment. If a 4-5 hr lost for DST caused an adjustment from 11/11 to 10/10 then an award of 4 extra wins is unjustifiable.

  9. #129
    Newbie
    Member Since
    Jun 2013
    Post Count
    37
    Happy, based on the matching algorithm, with the 4 hr back , taw would be in the range of 24 hr where taw might meet sas again, so those wins are not assured.

  10. #130
    Quote Originally Posted by reticlover View Post
    what i find so wrong in this situation is the fact that if TAW had been able to battle in the first 4 hours and matched SAS during battle. they still would have lost and not had enough time to finish their streaks. when TAW lost they onle had 20h left till battle end. with the matching times from battle it would have left only about 19h 30 minutes max. not enough time to run streak of 9 and streak of 11 to finish their streaks, GREE needs to take back the prizes from taw or refund every dime sas spent for battle. if gree doesnt undue what they did i will be filing with google for a refund on every dime i spent on this game. i can spend that 4k on something else
    Just another cry baby from sas...lmao...take your normal 2nd place and zip it

  11. #131
    Consistent Contributor
    Member Since
    Sep 2012
    Post Count
    196
    Quote Originally Posted by CJ54 View Post
    Actually, in previous cases of lockouts or other major verifiable interruptions during a WD event, we have either adjusted the goals if a global problem or adjusted things for the syndicates effected, regardless of who those syndicates are. The fact is that this time it was just two syndicates affected by the technical issues, but it wouldn't have mattered who it was.

    EDIT: Seriously, Montecore, tone done the flaming / trolling please. If SAS had been hit the same way by the issue, we would have done the same thing because it is completely fair to adjust the goal when it is potentially impossible to complete due to an issue on our side.
    It's better to keep silent. Now we know that both SAS and TAW have the privilege to take what they haven't earned. How about other teams and players? What if they write a ticket to Gree if they're also affected? Probably "Thanks for contacting GREE Support! We apologize for the delay in reply to your initial ticket request. Please let us know if you are still experiencing an issue in-game, and if so please feel free to reply to this email. One of our specialists will be happy to assist you. "

  12. #132
    Prominent Poet Nighteg's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jul 2012
    Post Count
    1,367
    Quote Originally Posted by CJ54 View Post
    Actually, in previous cases of lockouts or other major verifiable interruptions during a WD event, we have either adjusted the goals if a global problem or adjusted things for the syndicates effected, regardless of who those syndicates are.
    Do you remember how about 6 months ago when most of the Europeans were locked out of war 1 hour before the end?
    Do you remember how many people and syns were screwed by this?
    Do you remember the "we're apologize for the inconvenience" robotic answer by your support?

  13. #133
    Verbose Veteran AppleMacGuy's Avatar
    Member Since
    Aug 2011
    Post Count
    941
    Quote Originally Posted by montecore View Post
    no, rules for the rich, delusional pr**s like AMG, then rules for everyone else. i am submitting a ticket to have the vest removed from my inventory. there is nothing honorable about owning it anymore.

    AMG: we know TAW was behind baddad faking cancer. his lies about it simply show the type of person he is and what little truth there is to his alleged hacking incident. he lied about dying of stage four pancreatic cancer, urged on by you, abd you expect anyone here to buy the 'baddad was hacked' rubbish?

    further, i hav screenshots almost a year old of trev gloating about having spies in sas, and how rhe fc board voted to keep it going.

    also, you still coukdnt beat us head to head
    Believe whatever you want about Baddad...I repeat again, that story was nothing to do with us.

    You are a cast-iron liar regarding trev's boasts about our spies. Neither FC nor TAW has _ever_ had spies in SAS. You on the other hand, exist purely to put spies in any and every syndicate you consider a threat to your precious streaks. We fight against whoever is matched with us, whilst you have actively avoided us time and time again. The truth hurts. Lmao.

    We have beaten you plenty times head to head...do you want the ss posted? The plain truth is, you have _never_ placed #1 despite trying several times...FACT, FACT, FACT. Suck it.

    I'll give you one thing though, you are #1 at spouting a constant stream on meaningless drivel. Whatever.

    ...and the mods should ban you for that expletive you wrote above.
    Last edited by AppleMacGuy; 04-24-2014 at 09:43 AM. Reason: typo
    Regards,
    AppleMacGuy.

    Crime City
    Level 250 Income Per Hour $146,248,304 Mafia 500
    Attack 2,364,239,212 Defence 974,352,977 Fights Won 348,349 Robberies Won 134,524

    Kingdom Age
    Level 232 Income Per Hour 181,242 Gold Allies 497
    Attack 2,303,184,218 Defence 1,626,489,130 Battles Won 97,313 Raids Won 39,171



  14. #134
    Newbie
    Member Since
    Jun 2013
    Post Count
    37
    Happy, I too may follow your example if this is not resolved to my satisfaction by the end of my current gold supply.

  15. #135
    Newbie
    Member Since
    Jun 2013
    Post Count
    37
    I agree there is too many accusation being thrown around on both sides.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •