Blood Bowl LXVIII PvP Tournament!

[Jeremy Kyle]

What about syn and individual ranking prizes?

[Jeremy Kyle]

Not even a rank for ind and syn? You actually made pvp worse!!!!!! Great job GREE nobody will spend on this

[Armalg-the-Good]

nevermind..

[Jeremy Kyle]

A.) At least you get bricks for your effort

B.) The breakdown is different than other pvp events...there is only 50 wins in-between most of the prizes and the last tier only requires 100 extra wins. This doesn't seem that unreasonable to me and not that expensive to finish if you need to use gold at all.

You know that you start back at 0 when you finish a goal, add them all together and thats total wins

[aron]

where's the leaderboard?

[offline04]

What a joke...

[Wolverine Eater]

A gold sale would be nice!

[MsTink0514]

I have the goals, but no icon on the right of my screen. Is there no syndicate part to this pvp?

[Green Drake]

Sigh. This is as boring as LTQ. Anyone can just push a button. Was hoping for at least trying to find decent targets. One more event to pass on.

[The Toe]

WOW, not even close to what we were looking for. Just go attack people, get tons of exp, a few junk prizes and the end? No Rankings? No points? No nothing? Bummer.....

[cditti]

first 3 targets I was going to hit are 15mil higher than me this is impossible

[eleosrincon]

Every one in my list has the same stats as me and I don't want to give them a way to my hood to take my money.

[CJ54]

Cj54 the prizes for the involvement needed is terrible. And as you mentioned, the lack of a syndicate goal and a leaderboard makes me want to sit this one out.

I hear you. There are potentially conflicting design goals between the different ways you can do one of these, and I can understand wanting to marshal the syndicate for more freeform pvp than is found in a Bay City event.

Every one in my list has the same stats as me and I don't want to give them a way to my hood to take my money.

Some things involve risk.

So stop populating the rivals list with "beaten up" players.

Especially during a pvp event, that state can (and does) change between the time someone is on your list and when you press the attack button.

[montecore]

I hear you. There are potentially conflicting design goals between the different ways you can do one of these, and I can understand wanting to marshal the syndicate for more freeform pvp than is found in a Bay City event.



Some things involve risk.



Especially during a pvp event, that state can (and does) change between the time someone is on your list and when you press the attack button.

I don't think you understand. Every single time I reload my rivals list, I get the following players:

tam
C-Money
Geo
Madam Liv
luke
Skye
zangief
uffuff (level 202 hacker, but that's another story)
Rooster

These ones are there about every other time I refresh:

VIK
-INF@MOU5-
FAST EDDIE
peggiesue
TonyTBoss

And then there are a handful of others, probably less than 100 in total if I refresh the list 40 times.

The issue is that the first and second list of players are all "too beat up already". What I am proposing is that when I hit refresh, those players are all yanked from the pool and I get 20 new names until they are hittable again. I don't care about the defenses or the levels.

As it stands now I will continue to refresh, and I will continue to find tam, Rooster, zangief, and Geo at the top of my list. And they are all too beaten up except for tam. Who I am now hitting and losing to on occasion. And then she will be too beaten up again.

[montecore]

This party sucks.

We were so pumped for the old PVP format.