Thread: Strippers for RR
-
01-03-2014, 02:25 PM #76
- Join Date
- Apr 2013
- Posts
- 81
I am struggling to think of a way that gree could 'fix' this problem programmatically without adversely affecting other mechanics and tactics.
Limit swapping of armours during gw? Doing so would also remove the ability for players to legitimately swap their armours to counter attacks or to target other players armours.
Stop people wearing non maxed armours? What about new players who may not have a full compliment of maxed armours?
Use a combination of level and armours. Ie force all lvl 100+ Players to only use maxed armours. Easy to get around by having a lvl 99 player as your gm.
Also with enforcing maxed armours only the gm could simply wear maxed basic basic armor
In the end I think that this sort of thing will only cease if guilds stop doing it of their own accord - which is unlikely to ever happen.
-
01-03-2014, 02:28 PM #77
- Join Date
- Jan 2013
- Posts
- 1,382
They need to add parameters that will make farming fully geared knights worth exponentially more than stripped.
Ie:
SA bonus
Armor quality bonus
Enemy armor quality bonus
Dodge bonus
Surviving Knight bonus
Damage done bonus
Flat win rate bonus instead of 50%
Just off the top of my head
A full roster clear system would be pretty amazing actually & more "realistic" than spamming same enemy over & over. Would also cost a fortune in refills so Gree winsLast edited by Eunuchorn; 01-03-2014 at 02:31 PM.
-
01-03-2014, 02:35 PM #78
- Join Date
- Apr 2013
- Posts
- 81
Good ideas eunuchorn. The scoring system currently seems to be somewhat random from what I have observed, so adding point bonuses and penalties would be great. In regards to the roster system, I have seen it mentioned a few times and would love to see it implemented.
-
01-03-2014, 02:49 PM #79
-
01-03-2014, 02:53 PM #80
- Join Date
- Nov 2013
- Posts
- 157
In my opinion, I think points should be based soley on the rank of the enemy, and the quality of armors they have. This means, give different armors at different levels different point ratings. Then multiply it by a rank multiplier.
For example, you attack a high commander with 2 fusion boost armors. Each fusion boost armor gives 10 points, and since his is a high commander, multiply the points by 1.05. You would get 21 points. Then you attack a commander with 3 maxed epics, for instance mael, tect, and bronze chromatic. The base points for each armor are 125 for mael, 115 for tectonic, and 150 for bronze chromatic. Then you get 98 bonus points for each armor, since they are maxed, and have been leveled 98 times each. Since he is a commander, you would multiply it by 1 and get 684. Yes, you would get a lot more points, but if people were playing the way it was intended, everyone would be getting good points. It would also make it more beneficial playing good guilds.
Also, to prevent people cheating the system, if more than ten people in the guild you are facing are stripped, you get a flat 200 points for battle.
-
01-03-2014, 02:59 PM #81
- Join Date
- Dec 2013
- Posts
- 24
-
01-03-2014, 04:10 PM #82
- Join Date
- Jan 2013
- Posts
- 1,382
It all comes down to element order & guild bonuses anyways.
Everything needs pros & cons to balance (use good armor, be worth more points)
-Armor * should absolutely have X amount points tied to it.
-HCs should get more points for killing GMs than GMvsGM
-Opposing team should get X points for enemy losses
-
01-03-2014, 04:18 PM #83
- Join Date
- Nov 2013
- Posts
- 157
-
01-03-2014, 05:01 PM #84
- Join Date
- Sep 2013
- Location
- Moon
- Posts
- 308
iOS is so much fantastic everyone is super funny ^_^
the best guild ever UNTOUCHABLE
T1 every weak, T3 when we slack.
Touch for life.
-
01-03-2014, 05:42 PM #85
yawnz.. what is wrong with strippers? I tink it is part of the strategy for guilds who want to fight for first second or third.. not happy then dun play lah..why so serious about it...
other guilds could be sponsored to play the game, what are you so annoyed by pp winning?
-
01-03-2014, 06:05 PM #86
- Join Date
- Jun 2013
- Posts
- 138
this is a solid idea but the stripping aspect is still gonna be a problem. u mentioned "strategically stripping", well a gm can strip before they sleep so they dont give a lot of points when sleeping. i do like the point system u r suggesting tho. somehow stripping needs to be elimated entirely.
-
01-03-2014, 06:18 PM #87
- Join Date
- Sep 2013
- Location
- In my own mind
- Posts
- 19
-
01-03-2014, 06:42 PM #88
-
01-03-2014, 07:56 PM #89
- Join Date
- Jan 2013
- Posts
- 1,382
Pride & integrity went out the door the day the US fed reserve came into existence. Get off your high horse, you'll die as a slave like the rest of us. We don't get personal pride or self worth as the #1 guild, we get + armors & like I have been saying since BEFORE DPC CHEST EXISTED:
Go + or go home.
-
01-03-2014, 08:14 PM #90
- Join Date
- Aug 2013
- Posts
- 89
@ruthless monkey: like i said, your idea essentially is asking us to quit the game. That doesn't work.
Edit: also, can I say that us wanting 10 rainbow guilds in top 10 will allow us to achieve the aim you want? It essentially means that spending in wars can be controlled then which gives the players more leverage.Last edited by template; 01-03-2014 at 08:17 PM.
IGN: TemplateRR
Line: Template
Guild: RR