Why is the RavenLord's Non-Plus Armour so Much Worse than Its Plus Armour?

[StMichael]

I just checked the Armour list and was shocked at the differences in relative stats! Is there a misprint in the list?

[Necromancers]

Ravenlord non-plus is available from about level 40+
Ravenlord plus is available from about level 95+

I don't think level 40's should get armors that are close in strength to the elite's armors.

[deathexe]

It's a typing error on the spreadsheet. Though normal armors usually have much less stats than the + version.

By the way, you should just send a PM to the moderators of the spreadsheet or post on the original spreadsheet thread if there's an error next time.

[StMichael]

Much less but this is really *too* much less. How do I let the spreadsheet moderator know?

[deathexe]

http://www.funzio.com/forum/showthre...Administration

Give it some time to be changed. It's still pretty early and not all the info for the boss armor has been input anyways.

[Silent follower]

The Ravenlord non-plus version has total stats of 1146/673, the increases are 10/5. It is a very offensive armor. The data sheet is just missing the level increases to get the real total values.

[StMichael]

Got it. So if that's the case, I should level up Ravenlord rather than the Roc Plus?

[deathexe]

Got it. So if that's the case, I should level up Ravenlord rather than the Roc Plus?

Normal Ravenlord's low defense makes it a pretty bad armor, and it's also around 100 behind in overall stats compared to roc+. It's not a good replacement, though roc+ is pretty bad as it is.

[Daenerys]

Got it. So if that's the case, I should level up Ravenlord rather than the Roc Plus?

I think it's just a bad armor. With such low defenses, and plenty of strong fire armors around, it will get one-shot easily. Then it doesn't matter how high the offensive is.

But I am more biased toward balanced armors or armors with more defense.