-
09-19-2013, 04:07 AM #61
I hope the plan is either that the prizes are awarded the same as in war (i.e.: top ten is awarded the prizes for top 25, top 50, etc.), or, of not, that the items and modifiers are much stronger than has ever been awarded before.
And this was the most expensive top ten ever in Crime City, and it's because we we chasing an attack item with no attack items available for the four tier below top ten. Don't give us a defense item. Give us something worthy of the real money spent - and something that legitimately separates us from the 11th and 12th place teams who never should've received the top ten items in the first place.
-
09-19-2013, 04:13 AM #62
- Join Date
- Sep 2013
- Location
- (noun) lo•ca•tion [loh-key-shuh n] a place of settlement, activity or residence.
- Posts
- 1,060
-
09-19-2013, 04:14 AM #63
- Join Date
- Sep 2013
- Location
- (noun) lo•ca•tion [loh-key-shuh n] a place of settlement, activity or residence.
- Posts
- 1,060
-
09-19-2013, 05:14 AM #64
extra reward for achieving the original tier
Fingers crossed and hope you work it out
The Pink Mist
Top 150 Syndicate
Recruiting active players for a friendly, no drama, international team,
- Gold use optional,
- GroupMe chat app mandatory.
- If interested , please contact me by Private Message
-
09-19-2013, 06:04 AM #65
- Join Date
- Sep 2013
- Location
- Europe
- Posts
- 217
This is not the answer. This will make a few people happy but then it will upset more people. So far every answer they have tried has upset some people, just leave it be and make it up next war. Make top 10 stronger than usual, top 25 stronger than usual, so on and so forth.
This move will please the people who finished top 10, but will unfairly give them an extra war prize they haven't earnt. So instead of just 2 teams, 11th and 12th, 7 teams, 4th-10th, will have an extra un-earnt prize.
This just unfairly gives the game even more imbalance, and gives more people a stat boost they haven't worked for.
-
09-19-2013, 09:03 AM #66
-
09-19-2013, 10:27 AM #67
- Join Date
- May 2012
- Location
- Las Vegas
- Posts
- 1,651
-
09-19-2013, 10:42 AM #68
Good Job
Great job on the forum post. Responding to your customers is a great start.
-
09-19-2013, 05:28 PM #69
Altering the prizes for next war wouldn't do anything to resolve the issue and wouldn't reward this who paid more for or worked harder for their spots. What if a team spent extra this war and only intended to pop into the Top 10 momentarily. Next war, they won't get the benefit they paid for this war. If 11th, 26th, etc. from this war get the better prize next war then they've benefitted unequally still.
-
09-19-2013, 05:38 PM #70
-
09-19-2013, 05:48 PM #71
Yeah right, and you'd have every right to be upset that the Top 10 teams "unfairly received an extra war prize" over the Top 11/12 teams, you know, even though the Top 10 teams scored 7 million more IP than 12th place. That's a larger margin of victory than the 28th place team scored altogether. I don't know if you know this, but the Top10 teams earn an extra prize that the 11th and 12th place teams don't every war... it's called, "the Top10 prize." How the **** you think Top 10 teams getting 23 million IP is haven't "earnt" a Top10 prize is beyond me. That's about the dumbest thing I've seen all day, which says a lot considering how much time I spend on the forums. If GREE isn't going to remove Top 10 prizes from 11th/12th place teams/etc, then it is beyond reasonable compensation to reward Top 10 teams with their own prize, as scoring 7 million extra IP is most certainly "earning" an additional prize. It's the 11th/12th place teams that are getting a better deal than they deserve here, not the Top 10 teams who put up a record amount of points for Top10.
-
09-19-2013, 06:08 PM #72
-
09-19-2013, 06:11 PM #73
-
09-19-2013, 06:19 PM #74
I think this seems reasonable on the surface, but if don't know how the implementation would be done. Would it be given back as a percentage of gold spent in the war, so that somebody on a team who scored 2 mil IP would get more than somebody who scored 500k?
Also, maybe HTC spent a little more so that they could say they were 4th, but they'll still get refunded back to 12th most spent? Or perhaps a better example would be Indians. They seemingly tried to stick it out for Top 10 and ended up finishing 13th. The hurtful truth is that (assuming my statement is true) if a team makes an error in judgment (or perhaps better stated as a losing gamble) such as this, they shouldn't be refunded the gold they spent overtop of the 30th place team for instance.
Not sure if I made that last part clear....
-
09-19-2013, 06:59 PM #75