Don't worry op, all pp will have changed their names by then so you can give them some more free and easy points in the next battle. Oh and free advertising too.
Carry on the good work!
Don't worry op, all pp will have changed their names by then so you can give them some more free and easy points in the next battle. Oh and free advertising too.
Carry on the good work!
do i get free advertising too if my team runs the next battle without walls?
Where did you get that wonderful signature, Ziva? Absolutely fabulous. I will not sleep tonight knowing we hurt the Op's one friend. Join Project Phoenix if you would like to hurt the Op and his one ex-friend.
Dog House must've had a rank like 101, 151 or 251. The fact that you didn't reach your goal is not the fault of Project Phoenix. A lot of syndicates have PP's intel and they probably have a lot of intel too, including yours I guess.
Dear craftytempter,
I rarely bother with the main forum, I have better things to. The quality here is often disappointingly low. I do occasionally get lured out when a new low is reached in any one aspect. The one you have succeed in is a low of comprehension. Allow me to explain.
You allege above that Project Phoenix is culpable for some of your members giving us free points. Elsewhere you also mention that some of said members lost out on getting the points they needed. This is a fallacy.
Consider for a moment the free and immediate availability of the command center when there is no wall. You are welcome. Gree even suggests in its limited 'how-to' for syn war that you hit command center for easy points. Command center gives better points than do the wall. It is even at the same spot in the battle list. Couldn't be easier.
Secondly, we had secondary accounts in our syn with extremely low level, almost no mafia - stats down to under 2K. Anyone could have beaten them for better points than wall or command center. They were glaringly obvious.
For the argument that our no wall strategy caused us to get extra points unfairly is meaningless, this is something you had full control over and us none. You members chose to attack; they could just not have done so.
The true problem you are having is one of poor leadership. If your members are so poorly trained, so poorly organized and led that they cannot figure out what to do without a wall to bang their head against, then it is something that points to you as a leader/officer.
Incidentally, this is why I instituted the no-wall strategy. To capitalize on unorganized syndicates. Thank you for participating in this program.
Kind regards,
teo
Leader of Project Phoenix
Teo, you are my god.
Crime City
Ziva | 862•538•474
Syndicate: No Wankers
well spoken teo
Well said teo...he probably didn't realized he was a participant in the program!
Last edited by jesseawill; 08-26-2013 at 05:06 PM.
Teo, I laughed.....then I laughed some more!!! Great post!! We ourselves have run two battles now with no hideouts....still waiting for this kind of reaction to our strategy! Lol
I would suggest you donate some bricks to op, just so that he doesn't feel overwhelmed when he comes across a syn with no hideout!....
What a strange thread.
Let me get this straight:
OP's syndicate faced project phoenix in battle and lost to project phoenix. OP believes it was because project phoenix didn't have a wall, and so now OP is pissed at project phoenix because of the great strategy of project phoenix. And because he's pissed at a legitimate strategy by project phoenix he wants to give out their stats?!
If this is true, then this is a new low that i've seen. Not even the top syndicates post this kind of crap!!
please tell me it ain't so!