Pairings

[Warmonger]

My guild finished in the top 50 last war.

So far in this war in the first 6 battles we have faced:

Order of Dragon warriors twice. 10th last war.
Kings gate. 17th last war
Spectral Agony. 22nd last war
Bob. 30th last war.

We're finding this pretty tough, so I was wondering how other guilds are finding their pairings?

[David.]

Not much better, the stats in our guild range from 100k to 900k but half the guild we battle have a few ppl under 80 with low stats but the rest is 500k-1.5mil.

[Mr T Perfect]

Warmonger

we enjoyed that last battle emensly

[Alexius]

We've been severely outmatched on half of our wars. Gods of Valhalla twice and Dragon Warriors once out of 6 matches. It is what it is.

The funny thing is we're currently ranked top 300 and GoV is 10th lol

[jchow69]

We had pretty good matchups so far. Found a guy at level 139 with 76k defense and a guy at level 175 with 116k defense. I ripped them both up.

[ELVIS2K13]

I would love any of those match ups

[jchow69]

I would love any of those match ups

U mean the matchups that I posted? I am level 50 with 155k/143k stats. I enjoy those targets very much. I want more of them, pls.

[Mr T Perfect]

You just have to fight who you get!

come on if it were based on ranking - Ferr and FUN would be bored to the back teeth of eachother!!

[jchow69]

I have a plan to get 50 wins and spend less cash if any1 wants to hear it.

[Mr T Perfect]

GO on?? ....

[jchow69]

GO on?? ....

Instead of bursting all you have for one win, if an opponent scores 10k in a battle, you score 11k just to count as a win and save money. If you lose, you lose by a lot and then you save up health 4 next battle.

[tinyblazer]

Instead of bursting all you have for one win, if an opponent scores 10k in a battle, you score 11k just to count as a win and save money. If you lose, you lose by a lot and then you save up health 4 next battle.

Many guilds (especially lowly, free-playing guilds like ours) had been doing that since last war, just because we had to make meaningful use of our health and the reward of xxx wins is far more desirable than top yyy. But you don't know how crazy the final minute or two became. Everybody is lurking until then and try to one-up the other guild...

[Krayt]

You want to be guild you have fight a top guild...
I got an alt in a two man guild and they have fought guilds with 15 members. Now that is unfair

[Berneburg]

Instead of bursting all you have for one win, if an opponent scores 10k in a battle, you score 11k just to count as a win and save money. If you lose, you lose by a lot and then you save up health 4 next battle.

This is exactly what we have been doing; lost 1st battle, won three in a row, then have lost 10 in a row. We are a 150/200 ranked guild and we are still facing top 59/75 guilds even now. If the top guilds can slow play to slum down to me, why isn't my slow playing getting me 300/400 ranked guilds. This new win/loss twist seemed interesting at first, but for mid-range guilds it has completely disabled any ability to progress on their own.

[Berneburg]

This is exactly what we have been doing; lost 1st battle, won three in a row, then have lost 10 in a row. We are a 150/200 ranked guild and we are still facing top 59/75 guilds even now. If the top guilds can slow play to slum down to me, why isn't my slow playing getting me 300/400 ranked guilds. This new win/loss twist seemed interesting at first, but for mid-range guilds it has completely disabled any ability to progress on their own.

Facing Angry Red Heads right now; p after 10 losses in a row?! How is that equitable pairing?