250-150 syndicate matched vrs top 50-25

GREE

DECAGAMES Forum - Powered by vBulletin
Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: 250-150 syndicate matched vrs top 50-25

  1. #1
    Banned
    Member Since
    May 2012
    Post Count
    183

    Unhappy 250-150 syndicate matched vrs top 50-25

    our syndicate was match against top 50-25 syndicates for the last 3 fights as well as during the three day event.

    what the ------- is the match making system. can somebody shed a little light.


    they had way way more points then us every time and double our stats.

    Is gree just xxxxxxx with us or what. it takes gold to get us this high by why so many miss matched battles

    any ideas please knowledgeable forum junkis? Gree?

  2. #2
    Prominent Poet BigMoney's Avatar
    Member Since
    Mar 2013
    Post Count
    2,288
    If your stats are 300k/300k, you had the stats to hit people in the top 25-50.

  3. #3
    Banned
    Member Since
    May 2013
    Location
    analyzing noobs recruiting at recruitment section ;D
    Post Count
    437
    Quote Originally Posted by BigMoney View Post
    If your stats are 300k/300k, you had the stats to hit people in the top 25-50.
    there in top 250 not 75.

    edit: what i was meant to say is that not all people in this top 250 syndicate have 300k stats

  4. #4
    Prominent Poet BigMoney's Avatar
    Member Since
    Mar 2013
    Post Count
    2,288
    Quote Originally Posted by wa7sh View Post
    there in top 250 not 75.
    Yeah, I can read, thanks. Aggregate team stats are a factor in choosing matchups. Probably otherwise teams could sandbag it to sink outside their goal placing, and then get a really easy matchup for huge points.

    Top 25-50 teams routinely match teams in the Top 3. This is no different. It's probably preferable, actually, since a Top 25-50 is way more likely to have targets for you to hit.

  5. #5
    Prominent Poet
    Member Since
    Dec 2011
    Post Count
    1,280
    We're a top25 syndicate and have been matched against top 3 syndicates multiple times in a row...probably a worse scenario then you had...
    // Lvl: 250 // 488 394 051 // Atk: 9,917k // Def: 9,602k // IpH: $24,290,680
    // Lvl: 147 // 365 655 496 // Atk: 6,954k // Def: 6,790k // IpH: $12,586,132
    // Lvl: 79 // 233 936 800 // Atk: 5,978k // Def: 5,901k // IPH: $1,572,478

    As of 1-27-14

  6. #6
    Banned
    Member Since
    May 2012
    Post Count
    183
    i am the only one with 300k stats just tring to help out the small guys. most of the team are on ave 125k 150k attack / defense at best
    they had no chance. the other teams was shotting fish in a bucket......not cool man not cool. no chance of top 100 so why so hard.

    maybe i shouldnt help them as defence leader?

    thank for the info gents

    ps no one has hacked respect items or cheated items i vetted them all
    Last edited by craftytempter; 07-15-2013 at 12:09 PM.

  7. #7
    Prominent Poet BigMoney's Avatar
    Member Since
    Mar 2013
    Post Count
    2,288
    Quote Originally Posted by craftytempter View Post
    i am the only one with 300k stats just tring to help out the small guys. most of the team are on ave 125k 150k attack / defense at best
    they had no chance. the other teams was shotting fish in a bucket......not cool man not cool. no chance of top 100 so why so hard.
    This is exactly the same as a Top 25-50 matching a top 3. I have a decent attack stat, and I can't touch anyone in FC. I have 2-3 targets in Indians, Rogues, and SAS, but the majority of my teammates do not. You win some, you lose some. Part of the game.

  8. #8
    Banned
    Member Since
    May 2012
    Post Count
    183
    thanks for the help bigmoney

  9. #9
    Steady Scribe
    Member Since
    Mar 2013
    Post Count
    34
    We were up against at least 3 teams out of our league.
    I use my low level camper to sometimes hit the DL to see if I need to PA or not. I did that this one time in this battle and it showed 11900X. Thinking it was a DL with 119,000 def I did a regular attack. Turns out he had 1,119,000! WTF
    That isn't even a remotely close matchup to my stats and it was at least 6 or 7 battles in maybe more.
    Anyways the rest of their team was not as strong but not easy either....

  10. #10
    Banned
    Member Since
    May 2013
    Location
    analyzing noobs recruiting at recruitment section ;D
    Post Count
    437
    Quote Originally Posted by BigMoney View Post
    Yeah, I can read, thanks. Aggregate team stats are a factor in choosing matchups. Probably otherwise teams could sandbag it to sink outside their goal placing, and then get a really easy matchup for huge points.

    Top 25-50 teams routinely match teams in the Top 3. This is no different. It's probably preferable, actually, since a Top 25-50 is way more likely to have targets for you to hit.
    someone is mad

  11. #11
    Banned
    Member Since
    Jun 2013
    Post Count
    349
    Best solution isfor those top syndicates to recruit a high level losw stats person every war

  12. #12
    Articulate Author Tommy Two Toes's Avatar
    Member Since
    Dec 2012
    Location
    55.7517° N, 37.6178° E
    Post Count
    475

  13. #13
    Banned
    Member Since
    May 2012
    Post Count
    183
    no im not but thanks for asking........hummm you make me feel i should melt some butter ... hummmm lobster for dinner lol

  14. #14
    Newbie
    Member Since
    Jun 2013
    Post Count
    37

    I feel you

    Were usually a top 500 syndicate. We were gettin matched up with syndicates with over a million more points than us this round..

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •