Unfair battle match....

[DavidtheBoo]

We as a 38 man syndicate were matched with a 2 man syndicate. What you probably think is that it is unfair for the 2 man syndicate. WRONG. One of them has a defence of 550 K which no one of my syndicate members has as attack stats. The other one has 920 K defence...... The only thing i can say is: Gree, get a better match up system!!!

[bald zeemer]

Sorry about that.

If it makes you feel any better another 32 teams have had the same frustration.

[Ragmondino]

It sounds a clever policy to me. No one can score against them so well done on that idea..

[bald zeemer]

Cheers. Total points against us so far is around 50k. No fight losses yet.

[cheesy]

Cheers. Total points against us so far is around 50k. No fight losses yet.

Mind if I ask where you're ranked?
I've had my fingers crossed we wouldn't draw you since I heard about your syndicate.
It's worked so far.

[DavidtheBoo]

Cheers. Total points against us so far is around 50k. No fight losses yet.

That is only half of the points They got from the battle against my syndicate.

[bald zeemer]

Cheesy, matching is done primarily on aggregate stats, rather than rank. Generally we've hit teams whose high level players have had 50-120k defense. The highest ranked syndicate we've hit, I think, was MWWM. The lowest ranked was our first fight, a team later spotted at 1000.

On the upside that's a large pool of syndicates, and I think only twice have we hit the same team (when this happens we try to get in contact with the syndicate, so that we can offset declarations to prevent a re-match. We have no interest in holding others back, just getting the battles done).

[cheesy]

[QUOTE=bald zeemer;741748]Cheesy, matching is done primarily on aggregate stats, rather than rank. Generally we've hit teams whose high level players have had 50-120k defense.

That is why I asked. I'm with a higher placed crew this event. I think I'll keep my fingers crossed.