Question for the mods....

[Molly's Voice]

Just wondering why part of my sig was deleted?

It was merely pics of me (and fabulous ones at that) taken at a local LGBT function. No nudity or even any hint of it. I gotta say, I feel quite saddened by this if discrimination of my alternative lifestyle was the reason. It would display a level of ignorance and misunderstanding that sadly I am all to familiar with but that I had hoped was in the past. I thought we as a community were beginning the process of mending those wounds that have unfairly characterized my people as pariahs. Sadly, it appears I was wrong. There is still much healing to be done. I expected better from GREE.

[Molly's Voice]

In the interest of full disclosure, here's one of the pics in question, the other won't resize correctly now.

[Winnson]

In the interest of full disclosure, here's one of the pics in question, the other won't resize correctly now.

Looks like photobucket has some soul searching to do too.

[Molly's Voice]

Looks like photobucket has some soul searching to do too.

Heh, I saw that. That's pretty messed up. This is the kind of discrimination I'm talking about. There's nothing wrong with me showing off a little side pec every now and then. It's art.

[Clementine]

Heh, I saw that. That's pretty messed up. This is the kind of discrimination I'm talking about. There's nothing wrong with me showing off a little side pec every now and then. It's art.

Maybe someone saw it and was jealous.

But seriously, I hope that's not why they removed it, because that would be uncool.

[Molly's Voice]

Maybe someone saw it and was jealous.

But seriously, I hope that's not why they removed it, because that would be uncool.

Unfortunately, I fear this to be true. I sent a complaint already, haven't heard back yet. Sad times we still live in. I try to stay positive though. One's character is put to the test in times of adversity.

[Dipstik]

Maybe if you shopped out the tattoo?

[Molly's Voice]

Kickass tribal tats against TOS?

[Clementine]

The content of the pictures was fine, however the size of the images was too large, particularly since you included both in your signature. We ask that you keep your signature limited to a "reasonable size". We are going to be releasing an updated Code of Conduct soon and that will include signature limitations.

[Molly's Voice]

I figured reasonable size equaled the character limits set forth in the signature field for links and text, no?

May I include one of them?

[Clementine]

I figured reasonable size equaled the character limits set forth in the signature field for links and text, no?

May I include one of them?

Can you resize it so that it is no large than 200 pixels high? For images that is the recommended height. 600px x 200px

[legalious]

I would assume that if your signature is 2x larger than an average post, then it's probably too large.

[Molly's Voice]

I would assume that if your signature is 2x larger than an average post, then it's probably too large.

Thats sort of an ambiguous quantifier. You obviously have not seen any of Monte or Evan's posts.

[Evan1000]

Thats sort of an ambiguous quantifier. You obviously have not seen any of Monte or Evan's posts.

I'm working on it lol, but thanks for using my actual name this time around

[Molly's Voice]

Either way, thank you for the clarification. It's good to see that Gree is in fact tolerant of alt lifestyles.