With all of the complaint threads that run rampant across this forum lately I felt more than compelled to add another.. so seriously what is up with individual prizing? I mean seriously.. do I really have to try and avoid a higher ranked placement because the prize is actually worse than the tier below it? Especially for top players as their big mods make an even bigger difference even with a 1% difference. Take a look at these..
The Top 1 prize.. which should be the best prize for war as it's the hardest (and most expensive) to get.. is actually worse than the Top 6-10 prize! If I was Tam I wouldn't go for first this war..
Just a random, you know, 15% mod that's better than the prizes thousands of places above it.
Where'd all of these two digit mods come from? We don't see anymore two digit mods for another scroll through the tiers!
And the one that kills me the most..
Just a random 15% gun attack in one of the lowest rankings possible. That was better than my prize last war (which I'm more than annoyed you took out but left this mod in as I loved that prize and got in twice in a row) +13% melee attack for being in the tier Top 2001-2500! So seriously GREE.. fire whatever guy is coming up with these prizes and show some sign that your team of developers actually graduated high school.. in all fairness don't lock this thread just because I said that.
The idea I've been proposing for a while now is to let us choose our rankings! (The prize for our ranking or any prize before that tier). THAT way we don't have to worry about passing our tier.. or getting a worse prize for even more time/gold spent!
Thanks for reading any forum mods out there and please be sure to pass my common sense suggestion onto the developers for further discussion!