Ok, so let me get this straight.
Weasel and Dippy (and GREE) are saying that because it's "virtual currency", that somehow makes it ok to violate contract law? smh
Analogy:
I buy 3 goats for 30 USD. That transaction is complete and the property of both parties has exchanged hands (30 USD and 3 goats)
Now I make a contract with someone else, say a shoemaker. He tells me he'll give me a real leather shoe for 1 goat.
We make that transaction, and properties are exchanged under an understanding (a real leather shoe and a goat). I later found out that it wasn't real leather, was a contract not broken?
Of course it was! The shoemaker committed fraud! That's basic contract law, and is a cornerstone for a free society. Laws against fraud.
If am I wrong, then where?
Also, what if I gave the shoemaker was a chicken instead. Didn't I commit fraud in that instance?