**OFFICIAL** Feedback and Suggestions Thread!

Hi

Me and my guild are normally a nice top 100 non spending guild but this war we had such a bad run due of the guild we had to face..
Im not complaining or whining but out of 25 fights we lost 12 our first 5 wars were against top 25 guilds
Majestic(#6),whatever(#30),bondbeyondtime(#4),team ice(#23).majestic alliance(#9),brothers of steel(#10),night raiders(#13) etc.
These guilds are on top of the wars and earn credit for that!
but i think there should be a limit or cap on who you come up against as we lost badly our first 4-5 fights against these top guilds we dropped to 500 but kept getting top guilds to face.
I think there should be a limited amount of rank difference between guilds to fight(example 150 ranks above or under your current rank) like in arena you dont see rank #1 fight guys ranked 1000-5000.

I really think this would be more fair i know lotta people will disagree but fighting atleast 10 top 50 guilds is a bit well bs after a while you can only laugh and think gree is having a prank on us

An overall improvement would be to have your same crafted armors (snakes, basics, etc.) and fbas stack. Instead of taking up 10 slots for 10 fire fbas, one slot that has a stack of 10 fire fbas. This allows more room in your inventory, which is every helpful in trying to craft enough armors to enhance your primary armor. Then as you use the armors to enhance your primary armor, the stack goes down.

As it is, I can only craft so many basics or snakeskins (or whatever), then have to wait to get the EB or GW armor in my inventory and use up/enhance what I've crafted before I can craft again. If my inventory is already full of the EB interim prizes, I have to enhance them into someting and sometimes waste them before I can craft the EB armor.

Inventory space is already limited as we get more and more armors from bosses, chests, wars, etc. It would be nice to utilize it more efficiently.

use gems to remove radhagast on my friend list
use gems to increase friend capacity
use gems to unlock pm function
make more money

I would love to see a handful of things. One is epic raid bosses similar to KA and other GREE games. Where the whole guild has two hours to kill increasingly hard bosses for increasingly good rewards. Maybe a fuseable epic with the final reward being enough materials to craft a plus version.

Another thing is during wars, guild quests and individual quests. Win XXX wars or win XXX wars in a row. Also I enjoy the personal challenge, win 1000 battles that was recently implemented in KA.

Finally, I would like to see friend battles reflect the actual strength of people in the arena. I recall beating everyone on my friend's list, but then realizing that they were greatly weakened. I am not sure what bonus does not carry over but would love to see that changed.

Also, GM stripping is terrible during wars. There is no strategy involved and most of the fun flies right out the door and it becomes a tap-fest. Good luck coming up with a solution. Short term, GM stripping benefits your company. Long term, it kills the long term spenders with no incentive to spend more money on epic chests and other prizes.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Epon

An overall improvement would be to have your same crafted armors (snakes, basics, etc.) and fbas stack. Instead of taking up 10 slots for 10 fire fbas, one slot that has a stack of 10 fire fbas. This allows more room in your inventory, which is every helpful in trying to craft enough armors to enhance your primary armor. Then as you use the armors to enhance your primary armor, the stack goes down.

As it is, I can only craft so many basics or snakeskins (or whatever), then have to wait to get the EB or GW armor in my inventory and use up/enhance what I've crafted before I can craft again. If my inventory is already full of the EB interim prizes, I have to enhance them into someting and sometimes waste them before I can craft the EB armor.

Inventory space is already limited as we get more and more armors from bosses, chests, wars, etc. It would be nice to utilize it more efficiently.

---

Most games have limited inventory. Yes, things stack, but you still have a limited inventory. Even when you can buy more, its not infinite. The better idea is a "Hall of Armors" or something where you can have an inventory of dead armors that you want to keep around for show, or for those that want to be a collector (Eun). You know, drop it into the building storage and pay to get it back out.

But at the same time, having a limited inventory also leads you to making that hard decision on getting rid of that half leveled armor you keep saying you're going to level, or not crafting another. Decisions decisions.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dcpk

Hi

Me and my guild are normally a nice top 100 non spending guild but this war we had such a bad run due of the guild we had to face..
Im not complaining or whining but out of 25 fights we lost 12 our first 5 wars were against top 25 guilds
Majestic(#6),whatever(#30),bondbeyondtime(#4),team ice(#23).majestic alliance(#9),brothers of steel(#10),night raiders(#13) etc.
These guilds are on top of the wars and earn credit for that!
but i think there should be a limit or cap on who you come up against as we lost badly our first 4-5 fights against these top guilds we dropped to 500 but kept getting top guilds to face.
I think there should be a limited amount of rank difference between guilds to fight(example 150 ranks above or under your current rank) like in arena you dont see rank #1 fight guys ranked 1000-5000.

I really think this would be more fair i know lotta people will disagree but fighting atleast 10 top 50 guilds is a bit well bs after a while you can only laugh and think gree is having a prank on us

---

I think you are advocating for a "tiered" guild war. Basically teams "buy" into a battle level they are comfortable with prizes are based on battle or tier level. IMHO it would be a better fit and add some sustainability to the game compared to the limitless auction system we have now...

This also helps solve "stripping" and the other nonsense that goes on...

The tiered level system has been talked about in this thread so Gree is aware of it..

What I want


1) armour trade system
2) Changing of armours in dcp maybe add moontide in since its a weak epic
3) Have official alliance of guilds so at guild wars they fight as an alliance so that other guilds can go top ten instead of Majestic here , Majestic there or Death knights here and there with there sub guild
4) Maybe we should add all the dmg done to the epic boss with the guild and give epics to top 10 guilds that scores the highest dmg done.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mr Spock

I think you are advocating for a "tiered" guild war. Basically teams "buy" into a battle level they are comfortable with prizes are based on battle or tier level. IMHO it would be a better fit and add some sustainability to the game compared to the limitless auction system we have now...

This also helps solve "stripping" and the other nonsense that goes on...

The tiered level system has been talked about in this thread so Gree is aware of it..

---

Spock, no, he is not advocating for a tiered war system. Please shut it. This is not what he's talking about. There was no talk of "Buy in" you freaking loon. Re-read what he wrote. Has nothing to do with a tier system.

He wants a better matchmaking system. So #1 doesn't fight #550. And number #25 doesn't fight #717. More like #1 fights around the top 100. #100 would fight anyone from 1-200. Someone around 500 would fight anywhere from 400-600. Obviously this would need to be fluid as your rank changes, your available pool of competition changes. That way, those that actually beat the other teams move around as needed. Your standing determines who you can match up with, not who you "buy in" with. But as it stands, its usually few and far between that people have those crazy Top Ten guild vs. a 1 man guild.

Sounds like for the guy you quoted... it sounds like more of a personal problem and a string of bad luck. He said he was usually a top 100 team. Well, he's in the right ballpark for matchups if he used his own example of ~150 ranks. As they went down in ranks, then obviously he shouldn't still be matched with top 25, but, eventually if he's back in the top 100 range, he's back in that ballpark of potential matches.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by busteroaf

Spock: Please shut it on the tiered war system. This is not what he's talking about. There was no talk of "Buy" in you freaking loon.

He wants a better matchmaking system. So #1 doesn't fight #550. And number #25 doesn't fight #717. More like #1 fights around the top 100. #100 would fight anyone from 1-200. Someone around 500 would fight anywhere from 400-600. Obviously this would need to be fluid as your rank changes, your available pool of competition changes. That way, those that actually beat the other teams move around as needed. Your standing determines who you can match up with, not who you "buy in" with.

As for the OP you quoted... it sounds like more of a personal problem. He said he was usually a top 100 team. Well, he's in the right ballpark for matchups. If he only wants "easier" competition, they probably don't deserve top 100.

---

U should be nice... A tiered system is a way to correct the problem is all. If you can't keep from being mean u shouldn't be commenting on the forum. Just because someone has a different idea from u, is no reason to attack them Buster. U are obviously an "OAF". :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mr Spock

U should be nice... A tiered system is a way to correct the problem is all. If you can't keep from being mean u shouldn't be commenting on the forum. Just because someone has a different idea from u, is no reason to attack them Buster. U are obviously an "OAF". :)

---

You're the idiot that can't read what the post was about. It had nothing to do with Tiers that you keep talking about, and more about a closer, more compact match making system. End of story.

You're clearly nothing like the genius Spock.

And that was me being nice.

Limit so you can't fight the same guild twice in one war. Drawing the same enemy over and over is boring.
Have reducing number of points awarded by say 10% each time for hitting the same guy over and over to prevent single GM farming.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by gardibolt

Limit so you can't fight the same guild twice in one war. Drawing the same enemy over and over is boring.
Have reducing number of points awarded by say 10% each time for hitting the same guy over and over to prevent single GM farming.

---

So... on the off chance the matchmaking system puts you against a guild with one player, the team matched up with them is penalized because there aren't more people to fight? That seems fair.

Well, you will only have to fight them once. But seriously, it would need to go hand in hand with better matching. A top ten guild should never see such a one-person guild. Ever.

Lol top 10 teams also like to strategically block their rivals. By not allow them to fight the same team again would suck.

I know I should be using the account transfer thread but as it is closed I have no where else to run. I got a new phone and have been walking almost 3 weeks for my my account to transfer I have contact gree several times and have had not one reply. I put a lot of time and Money into my account I have got a letter that said everything should work now it didn't. Then I put in another ticket with all the info needed and a screenshot and they still asked me to give them the information which I already did. So I replied all my info again and have hearT nothing from them for a long time now. They might be losing a customer pretty soon I can't wait any longer. Can anyone help me.