World Domination Official Feedback Thread

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CTK

So i just realized that my faction bonus are not being applied to my stats on my iphone 5.
But a fellow faction member sent me a screen shot of my stats and he sees the bonus applied to my stats.

Ere is a huge difference. I have been missing out on all faction bonuses except iph since the start of WD events. This is rediculous and has cost me countles WD points, units, and money.

Has anyone else noticed this. It appears it is an epidemic that all iOS users are suffering. Rediculous. Needs to be fixed ASAP.

---

Are these the ones for the gold and Rae Munsoon aircraft from Funzio? Because I keep getting them everyday but they are not being delivered to my account. This problem needs to be fixed, Thus far I'm out 400 gold and 8 aircraft.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Augie

Is it fair for a level 100 player with an attack strength of say 125,000 to get more WD points than a level 200 player with an attack strength of 125,000 for defeating the same opponent?

---

Yes this is fair. Why shouldn't the lower level player who achieves the same attack / defense stats earlier than the higher level player be rewarded with better WD points? He or she has played the game better; either through better game play decisions or in some cases paying more money in gold units, but that's how this game is played anyway, the more money or effort you put in, the greater the rewards.

However, if you asked me should someone who's put a lot of gold in like Ferr, PJ and a pile more, get less points then the level 100 player attacking the same opponent... Well, I would have a harder time justifying that situation, which did happen during Greenland as well. I don't know how you would set up battle math for that.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Augie

Sadly Wai this is exactly what happened in Greenland. Higher level players did recieve less WD points (by my account around 33% less) than lower level players for defeating the same opponent.

---

It only appeared that way to you. Higher level players can receive consistently more points than lower levels attacking the exact same person.

If we kept the word 'levels' out of the discussion it might progress.

Some people received consistently more than others and others received less.

If something is said often enough, people believe it as fact.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Wai

It only appeared that way to you. Higher level players can receive consistently more points than lower levels attacking the exact same person.

If we kept the word 'levels' out of the discussion it might progress.

Some people received consistently more than others and others received less.

If something is said often enough, people believe it as fact.

---

Have you read this entire thread? Numerous players experienced this same WD point condition and Gree pretty much admitted the different "level based" scoring system. It was not a figment of my imagination. It is pointless to continue this debate with you.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Augie

Have you read this entire thread? Numerous players experienced this same WD point condition and Gree pretty much admitted the different "level based" scoring system. It was not a figment of my imagination. It is pointless to continue this debate with you.

---

Yes I have read the thread but did skip over some of it. There is no need to be condescending.

Yes I agree with you that numerous players experienced that. Players also experienced the opposite. I hope you accept that. If you do then the theory is disproven and we need to look further.

When did they admit that? Where is that thread?

I never said it was a figment of your imagination. I would not be so rude. You saw what you saw and I accept that totally. Kindly show the same level of courtesy to me.

I was not being personal towards you at all, I was trying to open discussion to discover the actual reason; to challenge the widely held beliefs.

Discussion gets shut down so quickly here to anyone who dares question.

It was not debating with you, I was trying to hold a discussion on a respectful level.

If you don't want to discover the answer, then that is a matter for you.

I will do as you ask and not assist further with this.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Wai

It only appeared that way to you. Higher level players can receive consistently more points than lower levels attacking the exact same person.

If we kept the word 'levels' out of the discussion it might progress.

Some people received consistently more than others and others received less.

If something is said often enough, people believe it as fact.

---

From what my entire faction experienced... Level 200 players scored at most 300 points for attacking a level 200 player. Generally ranged from 200-250. If we went against a faction with all low level players (happened several times) we would sit out the match as we were getting much lower points. Lower level players were able to score higher than 300 points for attacking the same target, points as high as 500 WD were scored. This is a fact from what the 40+ people in my faction experienced. As a level 200 player, this is very frustrating.

http://i46.tinypic.com/2z587mh.jpg

Level 110 player was able to score more against the same target than a level 200 player. #fact

Far out, Yes that is fact, I accept that happened to you fully. I accept it happend to many others as well.

Yes they are facts and yes I accept them. How can I be any clearer than that.

I am not challenging anyone's credibility here at all. I accept everyone who has said they experienced that as a fact. I also experienced exactly as you did. I also observed other things that caused me to analyse it further.

It's the conclusion that I am questioning and nothing more than that.

But that's enough now as I have just realised that we are moving off topic for this thread and apologise for that.

I am the highest level and strongest player in my faction. And I was able to score more points in any single hit than any of my other members, and more points overall through the entire war. Personally I think that the points given should be based off of how close the fight PvP was. If you successfully attacked or defended a player really close to your stats, you should get more points than that if you went to pick on the weakest little guys. There is no skill, chance or sportsmanship in that. But I do feel that you should score the most points if a lower stat player beat a overly large stat player. Makes sense to me.

All great ideas, I was wondering about having a building that can generate gold, perhaps 4 a day or something like that so we should have the chance of getting gold units or health packs. Also create a market where you can trade cash for valor or gold, something like 1 mill cash for 100 valor or 1mill cash for 1 gold. Also create buildings beyond level 10, something like getting certain gold units in cash value at certain level. As you can see I don't use gold. But making it this way it would make achievable beating high level players. I'll make it more addictive. To compensate losses you should put ads at the very beginning of the game, when it finish loading perhaps. Just throwing some ideas. Thanks for reading

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by vorm

The events are really fun, and you guys did a great job fixing a lot of the issues experienced on Brazil for this last one. My suggestions:

1) Both of the events were too long. Make them 2 or 3 days max. I know you are doing this.
2) Space them out more! 15 days till the next one is WAY to soon. Lots of players throw tons of their time and energy into them, and having them this often risk burning everyone out. Spacing them out longer allows for everyone to recover and it builds lots of anticipation and excitement for the next one and you lose all that if they happen all the time.
3) Also as has been said many times, make it where either only the leader and officers can declare war or have it show on the screen who declared it. It hasn't been much of an issue with my faction, but I know for others it has. Just takes one guy being a troll and going rogue or thinking it's funny to ruin everything for the whole faction.
4) Show stats for wall hits and Power Attacks. These are often valuable efforts to the faction and the players doing them need to have it show for them so that everyone knows they are doing their part.

---

absolutely bang on. A wise man here folks. He's tuned in to our human needs and emotional well being. Top boy! :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SGT Rud

I am the highest level and strongest player in my faction. And I was able to score more points in any single hit than any of my other members, and more points overall through the entire war. Personally I think that the points given should be based off of how close the fight PvP was. If you successfully attacked or defended a player really close to your stats, you should get more points than that if you went to pick on the weakest little guys. There is no skill, chance or sportsmanship in that. But I do feel that you should score the most points if a lower stat player beat a overly large stat player. Makes sense to me.

---

Are you level 200?

If so your faction sucks.

But do aggree it should be based on attack and defense not level

1. Let faction leader to give faction members medals/orders for WD battles.
2. WD points should be redeemable to something useful like medals above

I'm not sure this is the right place to post this but is it possible to have the option to see the players history before accepting them in the faction (at least show the previous factions including join/leave dates)?

There needs to be a way devised to allow factions to buy gold separate from that of an individual and the faction be allowed to disperse that gold its member who would benefit from be able to use the gold.

Please work a little extra hard on not aliniating people..

Suggestions:
Allow the Leader of a faction to mass MESSAGE! all of its members...Allow for faction forum messages to be directing notifying for players. Stop having events so close back to back.