Printable View
I enjoy the events but a few changes would be nice.
1. It would be nice to have more time between each event. An event each month would be ideal, in my opinion. I think people will look forward to them more and won't experience WD fatigue.
2. High level players shouldn't be penalised when it comes to the awarding of WD points.
3. 48 hours is more than enough time for an event, 72 hours tops.
Thanks CJ.
Add Faction Forum tab to the WD page (link to same Forum in the Faction area)Quote:
Originally Posted by mxz
- switching back and forth for team comm is really time consuming, sometimes freezes or closes app too.
HI this El ZEUS I WAS MEMBER OF LAND DOWN UNDER FACTION , I FOUGHT WITH THEM FOR GREEN LAND COUPLE OF DAYS BUT UNFORTUNATELY MY SAMSUNG GALAXY S3 GAVE UP I HAD TO FACTORY RESET IT I LOST THEM I WANT TO JOIN THEM BACK PLEASE GIVE THERE FACTION ID CAPTAIN BUZZA , CAPTION CORNY ADMRIL STEEL I MISS YOU GUYS PLEASE HELP ME..........ALLIANCE ID 683-753-804
Thanks CJ for this thread
I would like the ability to see battle attack
defense stats on my android. This put me at
a big disadvantage in communicating with my
faction.
I agree that the event should not be more than 3 days.
There should be 30 days between events
The unit losses were very steep and sometimes mismatched
when considering the weakness of the opponent.
Only one faction mismatch was noted during the event.
Had a good time and will play again.
The events should only take place once a month and should only be 3 days long.
One cool feature you could add would be cash rewards for factions in addition to unit rewards. For example, the top 10 factions could each get 1 billion cash, top 25 would get 500 million and so forth.
Never give up; never surrender!Quote:
Originally Posted by Q Raider
Though it has been said that “[t]he supreme art of war is to subdue the enemy without fighting.”
Incorporated a button for changing ingame names of each members of the factions when we are at War and a go back button to return in your Real ingame name after war.
3 days event Max.
1 battle a month like you said
As has been echoed here multiple times: Keep the events at 1 month apart for 3 days maximum.
Only one real issue for me which is the need to see who pressed the declare war button. I wouldn't advocate only allowing the leader or officers the privilage of declaring war, I would leave it as is but have the person who did declare highlighted in some way.
It would be helpful to l have an assistant leader that can remove members and upgrade wall if leader is away.
I have not read all the posts so I Assn not sure this was talked about yet. I live the fact that attacksdon't appear on newsfeeds, so their can be no retaliation later. Also fixed the lower ally WD points and made it more liked the game with bp. The stonger the opponent the more WD points. Makes it great for strong lower level players.
Stop punishing high level players just because they have played the game longer than others.
Level has nothing to do with how strong a player is in PvP.
Theybare already punished in boss events.
Let the losing players defence stat determin the points.
Scrap the boring and unfair PvP Tournaments.
No event should be based on stamina.
If you followed the advise that was given when you started playing the game that you do not need high stamina becourse it regenerates quite quickly then you do not have a chance in PvP Tournaments, and you can do nothing about it.
Or else it should be possible to purchase higher stamina with in game money. Maybe a bonus building.
Starting times on events/competitions should alternate so that they are not always tailored for US players.
Battles should not be longer than 72 hours.
Only leader and officers should be allowed to start wars.
Post which player declared war.
Bonus points for winning wars.
Let support help players with real problems before changing players names.
If a faction choses to have the same name on all members so they look the alike then award only one person the bonus units.
The Battle for Greenland otherwise known as Campers Reward
You did a lot of great things to improve our battle experience in Greenland,
thank you to the Gree team for their efforts.
My single largest and by far most important complaint is one that has
already been mentioned several times but I feel I must repeat it here
because of its importance. The awarding of WD points based on the level of
the attacker was a serious shortcoming of Greenland. I support making the
WD points a function of the level of the player you are attacking, you
should get more for attacking a level 150 player than a level 100 player
and indeed within a given level attacking a player with a higher defense
stat should yield higher WD points. However the amount of WD points given
should be solely based on the statistics of the person being attack and not
the attacker. Imagine my shock and chagrin when I found out I was receiving
200-250WD points for attacking someone yet some of my teammates were
receiving 350-400 points for attacking the same player. Level 200 players
are already penalized in the Boss event and now World Domination follows
suit. I am also a moderate gold player and yet now feel that my gold is
cheapened by this event. How would you feel if you were buying a loaf of
bread and the person in front of you put down $5 for that same loaf of bread
showed their drivers license and then sent on their way and you upon putting
down your $5 and showing your driver's license had half of your loaf of
bread taken away before being sent on your way. That is how I felt every
time I hit that 25 gold refresh button and attacked. To add injury to
insult you have made all the level 200 players prime targets for everyone
else. This WD point award strategy is a windfall for all those campers out
there who just sit at low levels building their strength. I am okay with
players using a camping strategy it is a viable way to play the game but I
do not believe my attack on the same player should be cheapen by giving the
camper more points for a successful attack. This inequity in WD point
distribution must be corrected before Egypt, make the WD points solely
dependent on the player being attacked and not the attacker. I for one will
not spend any gold refreshing in Egypt if my attack is worth less than a
lower level player.
The second complaint is that changes such as the one above must be
communicated prior to the start of the event so that Factions may understand
the rules and have time to adjust their strategy accordingly. This new
method of determining WD points was sprung upon us during the battle. I
don't mind some surprises in the battle but they must be such that Factions
can adjust to them. While some may argue that this new WD point
determination method was something that could be adjusted to I would counter
that this is true only to a point. The gold distributions amongst players
is not something that can be changed and thus if a team had loaded their
level 200 players with gold before Greenland they were stuck earning around
66 percent of the WD points they should have received. If the game allowed
for moving gold around between players during the battle then this could be
accounted for but it does not. So I ask you provide us the rules in advance
for cases where in game adjustments are not possible.
Thank you for your considerations in these matters
Hey CJ,
First of all, thank you for a much better user experience this time around. Additionally, I/we appreciated the quick gift turnaround and rankings, with points. Here are some observations and recommendations:
1. Observation - Battle spacing. Personally, I can't sustain a two week, maybe even a month spacing, but maybe that's good. Give other factions a chance or possibly change strategy to split factions participation as every other.
2. Suggestion - WD. We should have a way to track WD other than screenshots at the end of the battle. Maybe they could be included in the profile.
3. Suggestion - W/L. See above
4. Observation - WD points. I'm fine with the point scoring system and I understand the logic behind it.
5. Suggestion - Battle and forum. Create hotlinks between the two.
6. Observation - Message Board. Nah.
7. Suggestion - Health Regen. Please fix the "attach again" issue. Ticket#395720 :cool:
8. Suggestion - Allies. Since Ally counts have become more strategic, create holtlinks, e.g., 1-50, 51-100, 101-150. A search function or sorting capabilities would be even better.
That's all I have for now. Thank you.
Another idea:
You can reward a faction cash for their WD points. If your faction end up whit 100 000 WD points your faction gets
10 00 000 000 cash . Now its bether to be a camper faction then it is to participate in the event.