Printable View
Pets was not the way to go here.
This is Knights & Dragons.
Why didn't they add STEEDS.
I would 'pony up' for a war horse and/or war horses for my knights.
This could lead to adding Lances to the weapons mix as well as ARMOR for the war horses.
Bad move on the Pets Gree.
Sean
http://i63.tinypic.com/2re4mfm.jpg
Let's face it, pets are useless. They are overpriced if you buy them too.
People probably said that first part about rings and amulets too... And now they are grinding to ring and amulet set milestones/fishing for set/epic rings/amulets in chests...Quote:
Originally Posted by bstewar6
If They added stats to your knight, then theyd be nice. But they don't. R@A were nice from the beginningQuote:
Originally Posted by Marco_
bzzt. Yes they do. But only if the elements match. Plus, do we already know how much damage for ex. a maxed 3-star high-tier pet does and if/how much the skills scale? (certain 1-star or 2-star tier 1 level 1 pets already reduce raid boss damage by a few percent, so they are pretty significant when applied correctly. Same for heroic and taking 1 less damage on about half of the turns for the 3-turn shields)Quote:
Originally Posted by bstewar6
Yes i agree, in certain situations pets are good, but they serve no real purpose. I admit they freshen up the gameplay a little bit but nobody just LOVES pets.
Next we'll see water, wine, steaks and ribs for the knights. Only 99 gems per glass of water!