PDA

View Full Version : Should GW rewards be changed?



bosskiller
01-20-2014, 02:58 PM
Here are a few ideas to change the reward system for guild wars.

Personally, I think GREE would gain more revenue if an epic was expanded ro 15 and the + to 3. Most top 25 or so guilds would spend for 15, and top 10 would go for top 3. And lets be honest, the legendaries are horrendous. Old useless outdated EB armors should not be given as rewards. Thoughts?

knightsanddraggings
01-20-2014, 03:00 PM
Here are a few ideas to change the reward system for guild wars. What do you guys think?
??? Don't see any ideas.

bosskiller
01-20-2014, 03:02 PM
??? Don't see any ideas.

sorry. I was still posting the options.

knightsanddraggings
01-20-2014, 03:03 PM
sorry. I was still posting the options.
There we go.
Also, 493 posts like the number of Pokemon from Sinnoh :-)

Sol Invictus
01-20-2014, 03:15 PM
The ratio of effort and gems spent, to the rewards, for a 3-day war are absurdly disproportionate to the ratio of effort and gems spent, to the rewards, in a 1-day war.

The fight for top 50 was fierce for this war. Many gems were spent. But I'm telling you right now that I've got a couple dozen people who are not going to be spending gems like that again until the rewards are worth fighting for.

And if something isn't done about this fairly soon, then I don't see why I should stick around. Not gonna keep throwing money at GREE to turn a deaf ear.

King Of The Infernal
01-20-2014, 05:36 PM
No is the best gree can do already stop complaining before gree change rewards for 11-100 rank to basic armors

tnorman78
01-20-2014, 05:45 PM
Speaking from experience from other gree games. Until the top 5 teams quit spending nothing will ever be done.

Lou 1xxx
01-20-2014, 06:05 PM
top 25 actually... not just top 5.

Sol Invictus
01-20-2014, 06:10 PM
Add the pic in my sig to your sig and mean it?

Eunuchorn
01-20-2014, 07:16 PM
#1: Epic+, +10 max inventory, +1% EE/AE/HP regen (a different 1% each war)
#2: Epic+, +10 max inventory
#3: Epic+, +5 max inventory
#4-10: Epic, +5 max inventory
11-25: Epic
26-100: ****+
101-who cares

Or even regens for top 3
1: +1% EE/AE/HP
2: +1% EE/AE
3: +1% HP

bosskiller
01-20-2014, 07:34 PM
#1: Epic+, +10 max inventory, +1% EE/AE/HP regen (a different 1% each war)
#2: Epic+, +10 max inventory
#3: Epic+, +5 max inventory
#4-10: Epic, +5 max inventory
11-25: Epic
26-100: ****+
101-who cares

Or even regens for top 3
1: +1% EE/AE/HP
2: +1% EE/AE
3: +1% HP

those are some unique ideas.... I like them!

Dark Prince
01-20-2014, 08:43 PM
#1: Epic+, +10 max inventory, +1% EE/AE/HP regen (a different 1% each war)
#2: Epic+, +10 max inventory
#3: Epic+, +5 max inventory
#4-10: Epic, +5 max inventory
11-25: Epic
26-100: ****+
101-who cares

Or even regens for top 3
1: +1% EE/AE/HP
2: +1% EE/AE
3: +1% HP

Then don't spend next GW along with RP, RRu, Gree only listens to YOU anyway.

Street Shark
01-20-2014, 08:46 PM
top ten is cool, but 11+ sucks

bosskiller
01-21-2014, 04:31 PM
top ten is cool, but 11+ sucks

exactly. Needs to be changed...

Bshappell
01-22-2014, 01:30 AM
How would gree make more revenue if top 15 was epic? What ideas do you have to support that ludacris theory? Why not top 100 that would obviously do the trick???

Claptrap
01-22-2014, 01:42 AM
Whats the point of being #1 if 2nd and 3rd get the same reward? I'm sure as hell not going to spend more money if third place gets the same reward. This would result in a drop of spending, terrible idea imo.

Bride of Eunuchorn
01-22-2014, 02:04 AM
Whats the point of being #1 if 2nd and 3rd get the same reward? I'm sure as hell not going to spend more money if third place gets the same reward. This would result in a drop of spending, terrible idea imo.
Here ya go Clapster:


#1: ******(Artifact), +10 max inventory, +1% EE/AE/HP regen (a different 1% each war)
#2: Epic+, +10 max inventory
#3: Epic+, +5 max inventory
#4-10: Epic, +5 max inventory
11-25: Epic
26-100: ****+
101-who cares

Or even regens for top 3
1: +1% EE/AE/HP
2: +1% EE/AE
3: +1% HP


Then don't spend next GW along with RP, RRu, Gree only listens to YOU anyway.

Your delusional naïveté is kind of cute. Gree doesn't give a crap about the Eunuchorn.

bosskiller
01-22-2014, 06:45 AM
How would gree make more revenue if top 15 was epic? What ideas do you have to support that ludacris theory? Why not top 100 that would obviously do the trick???

Because other guilds that know they can't make top 10 would try now because they could possibly make the #15 spot. Obviously I could be wrong, but that is the way I look at it.

The Pale Rider
01-22-2014, 06:47 AM
Slight Correction:

1-10 (Unchanged)
11-25 OLD EPIC
26-50 ****+ (Must be better than current EB+)
50-100 **** (Must be better than current EB)
100+ who cares

10th place is already a huge battle every war. 25th place and 50th place will become lesser versions of the same.

sxespanky
01-22-2014, 11:22 AM
Slight Correction:

1-10 (Unchanged)
11-25 OLD EPIC
26-50 ****+ (Must be better than current EB+)
50-100 **** (Must be better than current EB)
100+ who cares

10th place is already a huge battle every war. 25th place and 50th place will become lesser versions of the same.

thats stupid because the new epic boss plus armors are on par with old epics. this logic will make your26-50 better than 11-25.

The Pale Rider
01-22-2014, 12:07 PM
thats stupid because the new epic boss plus armors are on par with old epics. this logic will make your26-50 better than 11-25.

Well I'd have to say your too dumb to read the armor spreadsheet. Only Moon has been surpassed by new EB+ armor. There's plenty of other old epic to choose from.

KnightsAndDragons
01-22-2014, 12:08 PM
I say they take time and craft a new legendary for rewards each 3 day war.

MWWM J
01-22-2014, 12:18 PM
#1: Epic+, +10 max inventory, +1% EE/AE/HP regen (a different 1% each war)
#2: Epic+, +10 max inventory
#3: Epic+, +5 max inventory
#4-10: Epic, +5 max inventory
11-25: Epic
26-100: ****+
101-who cares

Or even regens for top 3
1: +1% EE/AE/HP
2: +1% EE/AE
3: +1% HP
Gree don't read this. No need to incorporate same ideas to a different Gree game. Better legendarys yes but no percentage.

Bride of Eunuchorn
01-22-2014, 01:36 PM
Gree don't read this. No need to incorporate same ideas to a different Gree game. Better legendarys yes but no percentage.

Better legendaries? Are you stupid? How in the name of the goddess is that supposed to make more money for Gree? Silly top 50 guild GM....no idea how to boost consumer spending. Though, you prob don't spend so why would you want others trying harder for rewards & pushing you down.

Claptrap
01-22-2014, 02:47 PM
Slight Correction:

1-10 (Unchanged)
11-25 OLD EPIC
26-50 ****+ (Must be better than current EB+)
50-100 **** (Must be better than current EB)
100+ who cares

10th place is already a huge battle every war. 25th place and 50th place will become lesser versions of the same. don't listen to scrubs, this idea +1


thats stupid because the new epic boss plus armors are on par with old epics. this logic will make your26-50 better than 11-25. I think maybe he meant old epic+? And Epic boss armor still isn't 'on par' with old epics, Moontide+(3022)>current EB+(2714)

The Pale Rider
01-22-2014, 03:08 PM
don't listen to scrubs this idea +1

I think maybe he meant old epic+? And Epic boss armor still isn't 'on par' with old epics, Moontide+(3022)>current EB+(2714)

Claptrap -- other than Moon non-plus all of the Epics are better than all of the Legendary plus armor. There are only a couple of ****+ that have exceeded Moon. I am thinking specifically of Blaze, Tec, Beast, Cloud, Forge, Majesty and Mael. Basically the fuseable Epics, minus Moon. If they want to do Moon, it should be the plus version for 11-25.

The related issue is the lack of any armors better than the current EB+ in the DP Chest. Until recently those keys at least gave you a shot at an armor upgrade, now they're worthless. We need more leg+ armor for the DP chest and for the GW rewards.

Bride of Eunuchorn
01-22-2014, 04:26 PM
Claptrap -- other than Moon non-plus all of the Epics are better than all of the Legendary plus armor. There are only a couple of ****+ that have exceeded Moon. I am thinking specifically of Blaze, Tec, Beast, Cloud, Forge, Majesty and Mael. Basically the fuseable Epics, minus Moon. If they want to do Moon, it should be the plus version for 11-25.

The related issue is the lack of any armors better than the current EB+ in the DP Chest. Until recently those keys at least gave you a shot at an armor upgrade, now they're worthless. We need more leg+ armor for the DP chest and for the GW rewards.

I recall Eunuchorn mentioning several times, since before moon chest came into being, that the market needs to be flooded with even stat, various element ****s. Gree decided to invent epic instead. (which should have always been guild war only).

Claptrap
01-22-2014, 04:39 PM
Claptrap -- other than Moon non-plus all of the Epics are better than all of the Legendary plus armor. There are only a couple of ****+ that have exceeded Moon. I am thinking specifically of Blaze, Tec, Beast, Cloud, Forge, Majesty and Mael. Basically the fuseable Epics, minus Moon. If they want to do Moon, it should be the plus version for 11-25.
This does give me the idea that 11-15 get an old epic+ and 16-25 get an old epic increasing competition and spending

Bride of Eunuchorn
01-22-2014, 05:03 PM
This does give me the idea that 11-15 get an old epic+ and 16-25 get an old epic increasing competition and spending
That's true actually. Look at new arena, they already went back to Mael+ because no one was gonna spend like crazy for BVAN+ or Tec+, but a full guild with most members using legendaries sure as heck would.

The Pale Rider
01-22-2014, 06:05 PM
That's true actually. Look at new arena, they already went back to Mael+ because no one was gonna spend like crazy for BVAN+ or Tec+, but a full guild with most members using legendaries sure as heck would.

We'd be willing to double our spending for a Tec+. Just saying.

Kangaroeland
01-23-2014, 05:45 AM
Well 2x0=0

The Pale Rider
01-23-2014, 07:40 AM
Well 2x0=0

Ha ha. I've always been forthright about how much I spend, my guild spends and what I think it takes to stay top 50. Zero won't cut it. I use around 300 gems and usually score around 60k. The top scorers in my guild use 800+ gems and score 100k-180k. The HCs score between 25-50k and the commanders score 10-20k. That's sufficient to score 1.4 mil and end up 35th. Top 25 was 1,725,000. But why push to score another 350k for 2 boosts (we coasted the entire last day)? If there was a meaningful prize at 25, we'd push to double our score to 2.8 million which would have put us at 13th in the last war.

We have 6 top 50 finishes and 7 top 100 finishes. How'd you do?

karlervin
01-24-2014, 12:47 AM
Epic- for top 100 :) and change the freaking legendary prize!


And fusion boost war put some armors too!

bosskiller
01-24-2014, 07:12 AM
Epic- for top 100 :)

Hahahahahaha.... just no.

Doxer
01-24-2014, 03:39 PM
It definately needs to be improved a bit.

Ghost of the Eunuchorn
01-24-2014, 04:05 PM
We'd be willing to double our spending for a Tec+. Just saying.

Gree thinks they are really funny, wouldn't you agree?

Ghost of the Eunuchorn
01-24-2014, 04:05 PM
It definately needs to be improved a bit.

Definitely

bosskiller
01-24-2014, 04:17 PM
Definitely

Lolol. Look who it is...