PDA

View Full Version : Rewards for CK - Dark Forest



England Jon
12-24-2013, 03:21 AM
The rewards for the next CK seem very poor compared with previous events. We finished 111th and 118th in the last two so Top 150 both times. There is nothing in these rewards which would make us try for a similar ranking. Our biggest Gem members have said they will do the next for free only. What do others think about this?

_Mas_
12-24-2013, 04:11 AM
1st place has an awesome reward!! other than that all other rewards are very lame :(

senna
12-24-2013, 05:42 AM
Couldn't agree more. All prizes other than the top prize are laughable. It only goes to show that the core income from this game is so skewed towards the top two that Gree is trying to get all the top spenders to congregate in the top 2 guilds and go for each other's jugular for the top prize. I wonder what the 50 wins and 56 streak rewards will be. It has become increasingly poorer over time as well. Who knows, it might be a new low in the upcoming event

Nudist
12-24-2013, 06:04 AM
Noticed this too. Perhaps its trying to reel the stat inflation back in? Perhaps it will change prior to war? Let's try to be optimistic.

Voxker
12-24-2013, 06:25 AM
i think gree is trying something different, trying to make GLTQ's the main reward and the CoK rewards a little less OP in a way

also: lesser stat bonuses = less war participation? (although top 10 is a pretty big unit now.)

War Eagle
12-24-2013, 06:27 AM
Top 50 prize is pretty good. 5% alliance defense.

Krayt
12-24-2013, 06:29 AM
Top 50 is good, but 75 down isn't. No attack bonus and defense total is like 10%. Plus not mention their new bonuses which completely suck

Dredd JAG
12-24-2013, 07:54 AM
Couldn't agree more. All prizes other than the top prize are laughable. It only goes to show that the core income from this game is so skewed towards the top two that Gree is trying to get all the top spenders to congregate in the top 2 guilds and go for each other's jugular for the top prize. I wonder what the 50 wins and 56 streak rewards will be. It has become increasingly poorer over time as well. Who knows, it might be a new low in the upcoming event

This. I agree completely. Except for the T50 prize, all the prizes are pretty low compared to last wars, except the top prize which is quite nice. Spending was pretty low this war compared to the last few wars, where the top 2 guilds were close or over 100M each. What better way to get the cp (and by extension, gem spending) up again then offering a prize far superior to the 2nd place prize?

Peacock
12-24-2013, 10:25 AM
Couldn't agree more. All prizes other than the top prize are laughable. It only goes to show that the core income from this game is so skewed towards the top two that Gree is trying to get all the top spenders to congregate in the top 2 guilds and go for each other's jugular for the top prize.

Really good point stated. I would say more than 50% of the war revenue come from the top 2 teams. But FUN is bleeding faster than it can recover. Their new blood is going to spend lesser in the next war with this 2nd miserable prize thrown at their face and the unsecured 56 streaks. Their retiree splinter is performing much better with lesser money on the table. IMO Gree should power up the 1st and 2nd prize. This will definitely push SB to overtake FUN

Person
12-24-2013, 12:42 PM
Really good point stated. I would say more than 50% of the war revenue come from the top 2 teams. But FUN is bleeding faster than it can recover. Their new blood is going to spend lesser in the next war with this 2nd miserable prize thrown at their face and the unsecured 56 streaks. Their retiree splinter is performing much better with lesser money on the table. IMO Gree should power up the 1st and 2nd prize. This will definitely push SB to overtake FUN power up the first prize? It's an amazing boost, several top players would get near 1m from that boost lol.