View Full Version : short rant on guild wars
bosskiller
10-10-2013, 01:30 PM
When guilds were first introduced I was really excited. My brother had a guild on the IoS version already, and it seemed really cool, especially with the wars. If you were a good guild, you could win more armors and rewards. It was really fun at first.... but not anymore. I really have lost a lot of my original interest in this game, because of the wars. You have to spend so much money to get rewards. It isn't even a matter of who is the best, its a matter of who will spend the most! And then, on top of it all, Gree goes and makes the only good rewards the rewards for the top 10, which makes everyone spend all the more. It is getting a little ridiculous. Dark Knights have over one million points already after two battles. I'm happy for them, but at the same time, where is the fun in something like that? It totally defeats the purpose of the game.
Tim9870
10-10-2013, 01:31 PM
Kinda pointless to put gems into this war unless u are one of the top 10 guilds allready. if only the top 25 got some better rewards me and my guild mates would actually put gems into this war.
I have a short rant on this topic
Dude, we are DEATH Knights! Lol, other then that thanks for being happy about us :)
bosskiller
10-10-2013, 01:55 PM
Lol. Jw, but how much money have you spent on this war? I really have no clue, because my guild only half of our members have done anything yet, and we only have 29 total. 13 have done nothing.
SerKnight
10-10-2013, 02:22 PM
A guild of Batmans
ZERO_07
10-10-2013, 02:24 PM
Unicorn Stampede's dedication is pretty admirable, more reason why I like them.
iH8t2lose2
10-10-2013, 02:52 PM
I agree with Zero. Thr herd is the best.
Oryihn
10-10-2013, 02:52 PM
How is Titanium Backup working for you on your phones Fellas?
Rooted Phones - Titanium Backup = Free profit.
No worries.. I don't mind giving it to gree if it slows you down and makes the game fair.
-Solo-
10-10-2013, 03:13 PM
Any person with google knows about that ^
Sort of like when Earl told everyone...no one gave a ****.
dragonx254
10-10-2013, 03:41 PM
How is Titanium Backup working for you on your phones Fellas?
Rooted Phones - Titanium Backup = Free profit.
No worries.. I don't mind giving it to gree if it slows you down and makes the game fair.
What does that do?
I thought gems and such were server sided.
Stooboot
10-10-2013, 03:57 PM
I agree that something needs to be done about the rewards if ur not in a top 10 u mine as well not play, y spend money for a reward that is much less that the free boss u just put out. They should either make new legendary armors for 11-50 or just give them a ton of fusion boosts. Im in a top 10 but I still dont think its right for ppl to have to spend money to get rewards that they will never use
dragonx254
10-10-2013, 04:01 PM
I agree that something needs to be done about the rewards if ur not in a top 10 u mine as well not play, y spend money for a reward that is much less that the free boss u just put out. They should either make new legendary armors for 11-50 or just give them a ton of fusion boosts. Im in a top 10 but I still dont think its right for ppl to have to spend money to get rewards that they will never use
Well to be fair, no one HAS to spend anything.
People choose to spend money.
I personally wouldn't. Not on this war. But maybe a different one.
shawnk
10-10-2013, 04:13 PM
This game is a spending game. I guess we stop *****ing. the game is broken with all the plus epics anyways but I play because I love the guys in my guild and to me that's enough and also I can play the game every 3 hours or so and not be behind.
bosskiller
10-10-2013, 04:23 PM
I just wish that there wasn't so much spending. I almost wish you couldn't buy, and we would have even 1 war where there is no refilling, and you go simply off of strength. It just ruins the point of the game, in the state that it is, anyone could win the war, even if he has two star crap, all you have to do is outspend the next guy.
-Solo-
10-10-2013, 05:11 PM
in the state that it is, anyone could win the war, even if he has two star crap, all you have to do is outspend the next guy.
Are you going to pull a Royalt and attack the wall repeatedly to win?
bosskiller
10-10-2013, 06:32 PM
No, I'm just saying. I knew it already, I just wanted to see what others thought. I knew we weren't going to win, our guild isn't strong enough. I'm not attacking anyone.
Zyntree
10-10-2013, 06:32 PM
When guilds were first introduced I was really excited. My brother had a guild on the IoS version already, and it seemed really cool, especially with the wars. If you were a good guild, you could win more armors and rewards. It was really fun at first.... but not anymore. I really have lost a lot of my original interest in this game, because of the wars. You have to spend so much money to get rewards. It isn't even a matter of who is the best, its a matter of who will spend the most! And then, on top of it all, Gree goes and makes the only good rewards the rewards for the top 10, which makes everyone spend all the more. It is getting a little ridiculous. Dark Knights have over one million points already after two battles. I'm happy for them, but at the same time, where is the fun in something like that? It totally defeats the purpose of the game.
I suppose to me, being in the top 10 was never really possible, because even from the start, money won those spots. That the $$$ required for a top position has increased (and quite substantially, probably), my preclusion from that part of re game remains unchanged. What I'm really competing for is top 100 or top 50. You don't have to spend tons to get those, if you have a strong working guild. Top 25 has its share of spenders, if not as crazy.
The fun to me is getting everybody active and attacking, not just spam gemming. Agreed, where is the fun or competition in that? But it's always been like that for the top ten.
What's stupid is these rewards. Give me a fusion boost over lame chaingarb crep anyday. And 9 fusions stones over 1 fusion boost armor. Math isn't that hard, but once again the rewards for a lower tier are arguably better than for the higher (disregarding medals of course)...
Oryihn
10-10-2013, 06:41 PM
I suppose to me, being in the top 10 was never really possible, because even from the start, money won those spots. That the $$$ required for a top position has increased (and quite substantially, probably), my preclusion from that part of re game remains unchanged. What I'm really competing for is top 100 or top 50. You don't have to spend tons to get those, if you have a strong working guild. Top 25 has its share of spenders, if not as crazy.
The fun to me is getting everybody active and attacking, not just spam gemming. Agreed, where is the fun or competition in that? But it's always been like that for the top ten.
What's stupid is these rewards. Give me a fusion boost over lame chaingarb crep anyday. And 9 fusions stones over 1 fusion boost armor. Math isn't that hard, but once again the rewards for a lower tier are arguably better than for the higher (disregarding medals of course)...
I know you may not understand this, but I have to at least try.
My guild, Beastmode Gods, Is currently in the top 10. We just had a battle with Brotherhood of Steel that literally kept me on the edge of my seat for over an hour. It was intense, and it was close the entire time. We barely sc****d a victory off them at 107,000 to 103,000 points.
Where is the fun you ask?
That was the fun. We battled, tensions were high in my guild, and we all feel really really victorious now. It wasn't just a pish posh top 150 battle. It was quality entertainment. I think that the $$ I spend was worth it because it would be about what I pay to see a movie and get popcorn, only this time, it was far more rewarding.
~Nate~
10-10-2013, 06:43 PM
I know you may not understand this, but I have to at least try.
My guild, Beastmode Gods, Is currently in the top 10. We just had a battle with Brotherhood of Steel that literally kept me on the edge of my seat for over an hour. It was intense, and it was close the entire time. We barely sc****d a victory off them at 107,000 to 103,000 points.
Where is the fun you ask?
That was the fun. We battled, tensions were high in my guild, and we all feel really really victorious now. It wasn't just a pish posh top 150 battle. It was quality entertainment. I think that the $$ I spend was worth it because it would be about what I pay to see a movie and get popcorn, only this time, it was far more rewarding.
Good War :3
If we meet a 3rd time...
You'll lose :P
Oryihn
10-10-2013, 06:46 PM
Beastmode Gods 2
Brotherhood of Steel 0
We can take a loss and be ok :+)
bosskiller
10-10-2013, 06:49 PM
I see what you mean, but overall I think it is a lot more expensive than a movie, isn't it? I can only imagine how much you guys have spent in this war overall, if you are getting 107 thousand in one war. I can only imagine how much the Dark Knights have spent.
possum
10-10-2013, 07:07 PM
I kind of pity these people dropping all those dimes for something that will be obsolete in a few wars.
Inflation is getting ridiculous and if past precedent serves as a measuring stick, it will get much, much worse.
Armor levels skyrocketing, war frequency going through the roof to a point where something better will come along even before they get a chance to level up the armor they just spent $$$ winning lol.
Book it as it will happen, in fact it already has.
But hey, more power to Gree for milking it while killing the game at the same time.
Zyntree
10-10-2013, 07:29 PM
I know you may not understand this, but I have to at least try.
My guild, Beastmode Gods, Is currently in the top 10. We just had a battle with Brotherhood of Steel that literally kept me on the edge of my seat for over an hour. It was intense, and it was close the entire time. We barely sc****d a victory off them at 107,000 to 103,000 points.
Where is the fun you ask?
That was the fun. We battled, tensions were high in my guild, and we all feel really really victorious now. It wasn't just a pish posh top 150 battle. It was quality entertainment. I think that the $$ I spend was worth it because it would be about what I pay to see a movie and get popcorn, only this time, it was far more rewarding.
Alright, I could totally see that. That does sound fun, and for the price you might pay to see a movie or grab some beers, well worth it. We also scored a good win, but it was in our first battle. The frenzy came and they scored almost 10k in a few minutes. After the win, spirits were high in the guild. If I had the disposable income, maybe I would be there too, alas the budget of a student does not comply.
Forumers are often complaining, but I take it as the sign of a good game that we can both have fun, and I have to admit, your 'movie and a popcorn' sound a lot more exciting than mine. We're mostly a free guild, but still hanging around 50, and that's great to me
Gabzor89
10-10-2013, 07:51 PM
It totally defeats the purpose of the game.
The purpose of the game is to earn ****loads of money for the game company. Did you think it was for your fun and enjoyment?
bosskiller
10-11-2013, 07:23 AM
The purpose of the game is to earn ****loads of money for the game company. Did you think it was for your fun and enjoyment?
That, sir, is a very good point.
Sol Invictus
10-11-2013, 08:18 AM
I personally enjoy the fact that this game is pay-to-win and there are people out there who spend $100+/week.
This is how capitalism works, my friends. Smart people offer something for sale, and then dumb people buy it.
Usually, though, enterprising profit-seekers deliver a market need to consumers. Like food and clothing. But in this case, GREE and IUGO created nothing, really. They made moving pictures. And the people who spend hundreds on this game buy it up like gold.
It's really no different than someone who spends hundreds of dollars buying those silly stickers on LINE. Another example are the people who've dropped $99.99 for a sticker of a golden joint (http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2013/08/06/snoopify-app-sells-99-99-digital-sticker-people-actually-buy-it/) on Snoop Lion's Snoopify app.
These people paid $100...for a .jpg.
And that is essentially what the people in this game are doing when they spend hundreds of dollars...collectively, as a guild, thousands of dollars...they're buying animated gifs.
Capitalism: Separating stupid people from their money since 20,000 BCE
Ithiliond
10-11-2013, 08:30 AM
I don't like the way one can overspend his money to absolutely dominate the war. Where's the competition? In how much you are willing to spend and you can afford to? Maybe poker is a better game for that.
I think there must be a limit on the number of energy refills per battle at least. It's ok using gems to refill, but it would be more fun if the whole war was more about group coordination, instead of having the luck to get an insane spender as a guildmate who can alone win a war.
Hildigam
10-11-2013, 09:04 AM
I don't like the way one can overspend his money to absolutely dominate the war. Where's the competition? In how much you are willing to spend and you can afford to? Maybe poker is a better game for that.
I think there must be a limit on the number of energy refills per battle at least. It's ok using gems to refill, but it would be more fun if the whole war was more about group coordination, instead of having the luck to get an insane spender as a guildmate who can alone win a war.
One spender isnt going to put you up into the t10. Not by a long shot. To get t10 you whole guild needs to theow down 800gem minimum
bosskiller
10-11-2013, 10:24 AM
One spender isnt going to put you up into the t10. Not by a long shot. To get t10 you whole guild needs to theow down 800gem minimum
I am not sure about that. We only have 4 gemspenders right now, and we have about 5 people who are getting kicked after this war for inactivity, and we are in 35th. I am aware that is not very close to 10th, but if we had everyone spending, we would be in top 10. And that is just ridiculous that everyone needs to spend 100 dollars to get an armor in a GAME. And those armors will be obsolete in as soon as a month.
cafedecoy
10-11-2013, 10:33 AM
The purpose of the game is to earn ****loads of money for the game company. Did you think it was for your fun and enjoyment?
If that was the case, then why does GREE keep laying off people? So obviously we are both losers in this. Maybe they need to do something to help us have fun and enjoy the game :P
drygores
10-11-2013, 10:33 AM
It doesnt take as much money as you all think. We have 40 people in my guild. I've spent 40$. And am in top 5 of my guild. Yet we are still easily top 10. It just takes coordination from many people(I do feel sorry for those carrying their guilds though). I don't get why it makes people mad when others spend money. If you dont like the system, don't play. And oh ya, if it wasn't for spenders. There would be no game. So should be thanking us for giving you a game to play.
drygores
10-11-2013, 10:36 AM
I am not sure about that. We only have 4 gemspenders right now, and we have about 5 people who are getting kicked after this war for inactivity, and we are in 35th. I am aware that is not very close to 10th, but if we had everyone spending, we would be in top 10. And that is just ridiculous that everyone needs to spend 100 dollars to get an armor in a GAME. And those armors will be obsolete in as soon as a month.
I think its funny when people like yyou say its going to be obsolete. Look at your gear, if an epic is obsolete. Your entire gear iis by FAR obsolete.
shawnk
10-11-2013, 10:39 AM
r people really spending money to get into top 100? how stupid are people lol. we have played against at least 3 guilds who won because they spend and they are not even top 50. r people that stupid. do they want that jackalop armor lol. its sad. I just don't get it. top 250 is better than top 100 in rewards.
bosskiller
10-11-2013, 10:52 AM
It doesnt take as much money as you all think. We have 40 people in my guild. I've spent 40$. And am in top 5 of my guild. Yet we are still easily top 10. It just takes coordination from many people(I do feel sorry for those carrying their guilds though). I don't get why it makes people mad when others spend money. If you dont like the system, don't play. And oh ya, if it wasn't for spenders. There would be no game. So should be thanking us for giving you a game to play.
If we had 40 people in our guild, we probably would be that good too. Unfortunately, we only have 29, and 5 rarely play, which is why we are restructuring after this war. For only having 24 people who play, and 4 who spend gems, 32nd place isn't bad.
Sol Invictus
10-11-2013, 10:56 AM
It would be nice to be able to boot and promote people in wars. It only makes sense...that is when you really find out who is active and participating, and who is not.
I was able to identify two people that I want to get rid of, and potentially two more. But I can't.
possum
10-11-2013, 10:58 AM
I think its funny when people like yyou say its going to be obsolete. Look at your gear, if an epic is obsolete. Your entire gear iis by FAR obsolete.
I really don't think it bothers most of us. Does it bother you...obviously. The only difference is that we paid little and you paid a lot. You're the type of player (fool, sucker, etc.) that Gree desires the most (and on behalf of Gree, thank you for financing this game).
The only winners are those that are content with their place in the game or those that quit. You guys will be chasing a carrot you'll never catch. It's a factual realization that will cross your mind sooner or later.
drygores
10-11-2013, 11:08 AM
I really don't think it bothers most of us. Does it bother you...obviously. The only difference is that we paid little and you paid a lot. You're the type of player (fool, sucker, etc.) that Gree desires the most (and on behalf of Gree, thank you for financing this game).
The only winners are those that are content with their place in the game or those that quit. You guys will be chasing a carrot you'll never catch. It's a factual realization that will cross your mind sooner or later.
I'm very sorry 40$ is alot of money to you lol maybe somedat you wont be poor. and your also welcome for financing the game for you. I got enough money for the bboth of us bro.
deathexe
10-11-2013, 11:13 AM
It would be nice to be able to boot and promote people in wars. It only makes sense...that is when you really find out who is active and participating, and who is not.
I was able to identify two people that I want to get rid of, and potentially two more. But I can't.
It doesn't really make much sense actually. At the same time booting and promoting players during war would cause so many other problems.
You would see players complaining about how guild masters or HCs who were trolling have kicked them before they got their rewards even though they participated.
Also the whole point of not being able to promote or demote is part of the strategy of guild wars - you decide before hand who would have the best use for it and assign it accordingly.
Lou 1xxx
10-11-2013, 07:05 PM
the "declare button" should really be pushed by higher ups only.
many the times when one pushes and one simply idles by = will be kicked after event.
Hirro
10-12-2013, 07:49 AM
r people really spending money to get into top 100? how stupid are people lol. we have played against at least 3 guilds who won because they spend and they are not even top 50. r people that stupid. do they want that jackalop armor lol. its sad. I just don't get it. top 250 is better than top 100 in rewards.
Yes, my guild was defeated by gem spenders in the lower rank and farm my guildmates for warpoints. My concern is that there are high ranking members in other guild that I fought and they were able to gain a very high warpoints against lower rank members in my team....
possum
10-12-2013, 07:55 AM
I'm very sorry 40$ is alot of money to you lol maybe somedat you wont be poor. and your also welcome for financing the game for you. I got enough money for the bboth of us bro.
Aww, thanks man! Helping the needy is such an honorable motive and rest assured we are grateful.
Sparkle_DPA
10-12-2013, 04:04 PM
ooo ooo, a rant thread, i wanna join in with the following statement and hopefully gree reads it otherwise they lose a pretty decent portion of their monthly income from this game: Me and a **** load of other people decided that if the next war is 4 days long, we will quit. Hows that for marketing?
~Nate~
10-12-2013, 04:29 PM
My turn:3
TOP 10 = GEM SPENDING, GEM SOENDING AND GEUSS WHAT? MORE GEM SPENDING
Deatux
10-12-2013, 04:43 PM
ooo ooo, a rant thread, i wanna join in with the following statement and hopefully gree reads it otherwise they lose a pretty decent portion of their monthly income from this game: Me and a **** load of other people decided that if the next war is 4 days long, we will quit. Hows that for marketing?
I find these 4 day long one's ridiculous that its not funny, especially the fact tomorrow is thanks giving for me and i like to spend it with family, and friends :l
bosskiller
10-12-2013, 05:14 PM
Next war, we should just all agree to not spend gems :) lol as if that would ever happen. Gree would flip.
holygrale
10-12-2013, 05:35 PM
In the imaginary world, that everyone agrees and no one spends gems next war.....the results would still be remotely the same..the top 10 of the last 2 wars would mostly outgear (due to wins) AND out strategise (Due to experience) the rest....spend 10-20 minutes searching a top 10 team for a target, and it'll make sense.
Deatux
10-13-2013, 03:43 AM
In the imaginary world, that everyone agrees and no one spends gems next war.....the results would still be remotely the same..the top 10 of the last 2 wars would mostly outgear (due to wins) AND out strategise (Due to experience) the rest....spend 10-20 minutes searching a top 10 team for a target, and it'll make sense.
Funny thing, that its sad but true.
Marco_
10-13-2013, 07:10 AM
In the imaginary world, that everyone agrees and no one spends gems next war.....the results would still be remotely the same..the top 10 of the last 2 wars would mostly outgear (due to wins) AND out strategise (Due to experience) the rest....spend 10-20 minutes searching a top 10 team for a target, and it'll make sense.
you forgot out-man/woman.
If everyone is active all day long except when sleeping, that could be 10K points per person per day from free energy, so level 75 has a clear advantage in a non-spend war. ;)
jamiedmc
10-13-2013, 08:04 AM
I spend $100 on this war and I am currently 29th in my guild in points earned. That should give you some idea of how crazy the spending gets in a top guild during these wars. And this is the craziest one yet!
possum
10-13-2013, 08:09 AM
Looking over the leader board the rankings have become really stratified. Those below 15 have all but stopped. How many gems they spent to reach that point is anybody's guess?
And there will be four teams who will have spent a ton for nothing as well. Some lessons are better learned the hard way.
Oh, and it's comical watching the top two go after each other.
Gree thanks you all for participating and there's a long way to go...
Hildigam
10-13-2013, 08:09 AM
I spend $100 on this war and I am currently 29th in my guild in points earned. That should give you some idea of how crazy the spending gets in a top guild during these wars. And this is the craziest one yet!
You guys better get crackin if you wanna catch back up lol
cafedecoy
10-13-2013, 08:16 AM
I spend $100 on this war and I am currently 29th in my guild in points earned. That should give you some idea of how crazy the spending gets in a top guild during these wars. And this is the craziest one yet!
Seriously, you guys should consider changing to Android Platform. Right now, the leading guild at Android has 10 million less points than you, and their score is DOUBLE that of the #2 android guild. See my thread:
http://www.funzio.com/forum/showthread.php?70895-IOS-Guild-War-Watch-your-backs-they-re-coming-to-get-you!
Rylar
10-13-2013, 12:15 PM
From what I understand the scoring is quite different on different platforms. I wish I understood how the scoring worked at all. Right now (andriod) I can defeat a player and get between 150ish points to 300ish points. I can defeat the same player 2 attacks in a row and get 150 points less one attack than another and 0 reasons why.
Sparkle_DPA
10-13-2013, 12:23 PM
From what I understand the scoring is quite different on different platforms. I wish I understood how the scoring worked at all. Right now (andriod) I can defeat a player and get between 150ish points to 300ish points. I can defeat the same player 2 attacks in a row and get 150 points less one attack than another and 0 reasons why.
So basically what you are saying is that you hate unicorns? Thank you so much.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.2 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.