$500 Spent = Reward?

[imTectonic]

It would be great with all this ingame promoting of Fusion Chests (30gems) and 5X Gold that after
spending $500 you could get some sort of reward: like a Rare Cape or a random set
of Epic to have a guaranteed chance if you spend so much.
specifically for major in-game supporters.

quite honestly after opening 100-150 Dark Prince chests or Fusion Chests
and spending well over $500 with the best item being Admirals 4 Star with 275 stats:mad: could be
considered awaste of money with nothing to show for it. Just a suggestion to keep major gem buyers
interested and to have a point because I am obviously done with opening chests.

Other suggestion:
Chest Progress Bar to Legendary then Epic Chest
'x' number of gems spent on Chest Rewards = legendary armor only chest
'X' number of gems spent on Chest Rewards = Epic armor only chest

Thanks, Gree_d

[Eunuchorn]

An easily implement concept which they use in the other games, & an easy way to make us spend during times we normally wouldn't (ie the box events in ither Gree games)

[knights]

Not to pour cold water on this idea, but the mobs will whine about this being pay-to-win. There's no pleasing everyone.

[Varza]

Not to pour cold water on this idea, but the mobs will whine about this being pay-to-win. There's no pleasing everyone.

It still boggles my mind how the "mobs" don't realize this already IS pay-to-win. It actually is pay-to-do-reasonably-well, which I think is slightly worse. I just got back from reading the article in the other thread and it is SO true! Made me glad I've made my final decision regarding KnD a little while back :D

[Pwept]

I opened 55 fusion chests and got blazeborne, moontide, and a crap legendary.

[Lord Of The Infernal]

I got a basic air and water armor :'(

[Stooboot]

It would be great with all this ingame promoting of Fusion Chests (30gems) and 5X Gold that after
spending $500 you could get some sort of reward: like a Rare Cape or a random set
of Epic to have a guaranteed chance if you spend so much.
specifically for major in-game supporters.

quite honestly after opening 100-150 Dark Prince chests or Fusion Chests
and spending well over $500 with the best item being Admirals 4 Star with 275 stats:mad: could be
considered awaste of money with nothing to show for it. Just a suggestion to keep major gem buyers
interested and to have a point because I am obviously done with opening chests.

Thanks, Gree_d

wont be surprised if they do a frequent buyer program like mw and cc if u spend a certain in a month u get a certain amount free next month

[Starbuck*]

Great idea! Perhaps instead of it being based on cash spent, they could base it on gems spent instead. That might look better for Gree and have a better chance of being implemented. Capes don't excite me as rewards ( they would if they added an atk/def bonus to armor ) but the chance to win back a good number of gems or epic armor would be motivating.

[cryologic]

As a major gem buyer, I agree 100%. Give me free stuffs for my dollars plz!

[Sol Invictus]

lulz at people spending hundreds of dollars on a mobile game.

[Sparkle_DPA]

lulz at people spending hundreds of dollars on a mobile game.

who said we are spending hundreds? Might be thousands!!!!!!!!!!@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
ahahahahaha,ha, *clears throat*.

[Eunuchorn]

lulz at people spending hundreds of dollars on a mobile game.

I pity you for judging other people over something as trivial as carbon formed into numbers on your computer screen that you think has value equal to anything else. & hundreds is an easy lowball FYI. What do you spend your money on? Wait, nvm, I just stopped caring.

@starbuck
The only way they would do it would be through spending gems. It would be like:

Spend
200: this reward
600: this + that reward
2000(forcing you to buy $300 of gems but not spend all of them): This + That + the Other reward

[Tachycardia]

lulz at people spending hundreds of dollars on a mobile game.

If you have disposable income and are entertained by it, why not?

[Tachycardia]

@starbuck
The only way they would do it would be through spending gems. It would be like:

Spend
200: this reward
600: this + that reward
2000(forcing you to buy $300 of gems but not spend all of them): This + That + the Other reward

That's an idea I can get behind.
It would most likely serve to increase profits for Gree as well, if the rewards are right.

[Synovia]

Why the hell would Gree give free rewards to people who are going to spend money whether or not they get something?

You don't pander to the suckers, you pander to the people you're trying to get to spend. They don't have to do anything to get Eunechorne to pay. Any giving Eunechorne more stuff makes the rest of us less likely to pay.

Simple econ here guys.

[imTectonic]

@synovia I dont think you have the knowledge of business to comment
1. More frequent buyers attempt to earn the rewards
2. People who believe getting anything good out of the chest is downright impossible have a guaranteed reward and are more likely to spend the money
3. This is already an app where spenders have an advantage

[Tachycardia]

Seems more like psychology than economy

And as a big gemmer I can assure you that a nice reward for dropping more would spur me to spend.

Anyone here can have what Chorn has, minus the last +epic if you are willing to spend, just depends on if it's worth it to you.


So much whining the last few days

[PB_Buncil]

Seems more like psychology than economy

And as a big gemmer I can assure you that a nice reward for dropping more would spur me to spend.

Anyone here can have what Chorn has, minus the last +epic if you are willing to spend, just depends on if it's worth it to you.


So much whining the last few days

Agree 100% to Tachy...

As in other games, I.e, ether saga online. Ever player that spend, receive reward points that reward points can be used to get special items.
This KnD sucks I am wondering why I spend even $1, with no reward. Others by abusing video offers can get epic+, while big spenders get rubbish.
Time to quit people unless they change the odd that favors the main contributor of this game.

[PB_Buncil]

Please reward Tachicardia an exclusive box that guaranteed epic+ for all the gems he spent.
Otherwise we are gonna quit this game!

:)

[billiamwallace]

In MW + CC, etc... you have some 500 slots to fill, so getting one item to fill one slot isn't necessarily a game changer. To give one epic+ version will be a huge upgrade for a lot of people. At least I assume this convo is about epics, since Gree just did this with Aegis+.

Anyhow, I'm of the idea that once the people get what they want, why buy chests anymore? Eunuch and co are going to buy chests anyway, but when average Joe gets his 3 epics, whats left to get? Once you give them the bait, what are you going to dangle in front of them to promote spending?

[imTectonic]

In MW + CC, etc... you have some 500 slots to fill, so getting one item to fill one slot isn't necessarily a game changer. To give one epic+ version will be a huge upgrade for a lot of people. At least I assume this convo is about epics, since Gree just did this with Aegis+.

Anyhow, I'm of the idea that once the people get what they want, why buy chests anymore? Eunuch and co are going to buy chests anyway, but when average Joe gets his 3 epics, whats left to get? Once you give them the bait, what are you going to dangle in front of them to promote spending?

Thank you for posting this, that is why the reward is set at perhaps a high amount as the average joe would not spend $50+ anyways but why not dangle a reward at $100

[billiamwallace]

Thank you for posting this, that is why the reward is set at perhaps a high amount as the average joe would not spend $50+ anyways but why not dangle a reward at $100

That's why I mentioned the Aegis+. As a reward for opening 50 DPC's, at 20 gems each, you would have paid $25 before any sales. I don't remember what Gree was running during that period, but lets say it was 20% off gems, which would still put the price tag at $100. If they priced Aegis+ at $100, what do you think an epic+ would run?

[Eunuchorn]

The best thing they can do is
-make epics fusable
-make any epic from chests be + only (lower drop rate, more expensive, doesnt matter)
-flood the game with new **** that are in between current Leg & Epic stats. (****+ on par with epic normal)
Right now our version of frequent buyer is blitz war, but they still won't get the masses to spend that way.

[The Pale Rider]

The best thing they can do is
-make epics fusable
-make any epic from chests be + only (lower drop rate, more expensive, doesnt matter)
-flood the game with new **** that are in between current Leg & Epic stats. (****+ on par with epic normal)
Right now our version of frequent buyer is blitz war, but they still won't get the masses to spend that way.

They're close to this plan. I expect the next 3-4 boss+ to close gap to moontide. That's why it may be the only fuse able epic (it's close to a wash to level at 2700 vs 2550 for bear). That 150 point gap wi get filled in a few weeks. Then they make basic blaze, cloud and tec fuse able (one per upgrade?). At the end of 4 weeks you're back to epic plus and new epics at 3500-3800 which are only on the hands of a lucky few and guild war leaders.

I think this is the right answer, game becomes balanced again and the over release of epics when they first came out gets smoothed over.