PDA

View Full Version : why not full allies



KFH
06-28-2013, 05:34 PM
a de leader with 278 allies and over a million in stats. My question is why would he want 500 allies and have a much higher de.
And is it possible to have 1.2 mill de with 278 allies

Anonymously Yours
06-28-2013, 06:36 PM
a de leader with 278 allies and over a million in stats. My question is why would he want 500 allies and have a much higher de. And is it possible to have 1.2 mill de with 278 allies
There is sooo much I could say. But, some words are prohibited. Maybe dude didn't have 10 extra gold 4 VIP?

stephen2013
06-28-2013, 10:52 PM
The most units he can bring into battle are 1,112. 278 x 4 units = 1,112
1.2M/1,112 = 1,079 average unit defense.

Plausible? Hacker or gold use?

wwwjason
06-29-2013, 12:54 AM
I'm going to go out on a limb here and say hacker

I am a cow
06-29-2013, 02:37 AM
We faced him loot hacker

nickdpro99
06-29-2013, 06:26 AM
Might not be hacker. He may have a heck lot of boosts. I have 30-40% boost on my stats. His unboosted stats might be 600k. Due to boosts, it may be over 1 million.

Poopenshire
06-29-2013, 06:32 AM
loot hackers and cheaters hide low ally all the time. all the major factions would be able to see him if he didn't hide low ally. he would have been reported a dozen times over in a few days otherwise.I used to go low ally between events and hunt hackers. I would average maybe 4 or 5 a day immediately after an event.I had to stop this as Gree screwed up the rivals list and then screwed up the ally list.

KFH
06-29-2013, 08:40 PM
I thought something was up. Thanks for the input

oh_really!
06-29-2013, 09:06 PM
I don't know but we just faced someone with 88 "MIG 250" at LEVEL 76, 22 ALLIES AND OVER 1 MIL DEFENSE ---- hmmm...seems kinda off yeah. must be his boosts. :confused: lol

Rough Neck
06-29-2013, 09:34 PM
a de leader with 278 allies and over a million in stats. My question is why would he want 500 allies and have a much higher de.
And is it possible to have 1.2 mill de with 278 allies

He's just an anti social with no friends and nobody likes him !!!

KFH
06-29-2013, 11:00 PM
Lol I just can't see a situation that be a de leader I wouldn't have all 500 allies. I'm guessing if h e had 500 he would have over 2 mill in stats and that would raise some flags. I'm just made I forgot the team and player

Rough Neck
06-29-2013, 11:30 PM
He is lucky he had 278 allies, and that's the grunt !!

Rowdydowdy
06-30-2013, 06:49 AM
We fought a faction this morning where several players were low allies. Two specific were level 122 and both had over 230k defense. Yet one had 148 allies and the other 150 allies. Out of a faction of 40 about 10 or more were like that. These guys have been up and down the leader board in past events they have finished in the top 50 down to 600 and back up.

HACKERS??

Rough Neck
06-30-2013, 07:45 AM
Probably, anti social faction, no allies nor friends, only grunt......and they only group among themselves and hated each other !!!!

pick_sax
06-30-2013, 08:07 AM
Could be he things he is "bait" low allies, drawing in hits. As de leader, he isn't, obviously. Did units look legit?

360 Joules
07-02-2013, 06:23 AM
We fought a faction this morning where several players were low allies. Two specific were level 122 and both had over 230k defense. Yet one had 148 allies and the other 150 allies. Out of a faction of 40 about 10 or more were like that. These guys have been up and down the leader board in past events they have finished in the top 50 down to 600 and back up.

HACKERS??

My faction fought that same group..clearly hackers trying to stay under the radar

2nd Sea Raiders
07-02-2013, 06:36 AM
The most units he can bring into battle are 1,112. 278 x 4 units = 1,112
1.2M/1,112 = 1,079 average unit defense.

Plausible? Hacker or gold use?
You're not counting bonuses, they play a huge role.

Miner
07-02-2013, 06:39 AM
a de leader with 278 allies and over a million in stats. My question is why would he want 500 allies and have a much higher de.
And is it possible to have 1.2 mill de with 278 allies

I know the player you are referring to. We encountered them as well during the event. Within 30 seconds I could tell he was hacking units. He had a lot of top 10 WD event prizes, which is fine. But he had several of each. That was a pretty easy one to find. I've submitted screen prints to support under ticket #705633. I also reported their faction for supporting this players actions.

It's not uncommon for players to choose to play at lower allies even during WD events. On more than 1 occasion, I dropped allies on my LLP down to a point in which I had only gold units in battle. It didn't matter how many defeats I took at that point. No unit losses.

Allday
07-02-2013, 07:00 AM
a de leader with 278 allies and over a million in stats. My question is why would he want 500 allies and have a much higher de.
And is it possible to have 1.2 mill de with 278 allies
I have seen very strong players drop allies in attempt to find hackers with tons of money. Hacker or hacker hunter.

S&H Max
07-02-2013, 07:12 AM
We fought a faction this morning where several players were low allies. Two specific were level 122 and both had over 230k defense. Yet one had 148 allies and the other 150 allies. Out of a faction of 40 about 10 or more were like that. These guys have been up and down the leader board in past events they have finished in the top 50 down to 600 and back up.

HACKERS??

Those stats seems really legit to me, they are just keeping allies dont cause they are scare of the people at 500 allies or want do direct fire to them to make def wins

top 50 to top 600, migth have lost their big spender due to a merge or somthing, or everyone was out that weekend and they went gold free

I'm more aorund levle 165 I wont drop my allie that low but I guess I would be 350k-400k def at that allies count and I'm far from being the strongest at my level so they seems really legit, in fact if they go at 500 allies, theyr news feed will probably be really red!

Snipe
07-02-2013, 07:30 AM
Don't know if hacking or not, but may be good strategy. Low allies draws fire so away from rest of team, wastes enemy hits. And if low enough all hits are to gold units so zero losses. Of course other players figure it out pretty quickly but if you draw a bunch of hits each war could make a difference.

Also allows player to raid loads of people at less well protected brackets.

- Snipe

S&H Max
07-02-2013, 07:42 AM
Don't know if hacking or not, but may be good strategy. Low allies draws fire so away from rest of team, wastes enemy hits. And if low enough all hits are to gold units so zero losses. Of course other players figure it out pretty quickly but if you draw a bunch of hits each war could make a difference.

Also allows player to raid loads of people at less well protected brackets.

- Snipe

If the other faction is orgagnise you will only recive 1 hit and probably by a big player who is scouting so I would guess that on top50 and better that strategy wont give pts...

Minister Timothy
07-02-2013, 07:47 AM
Ranger 4 life went down to145-245 allies and is over 1 mil. Is he a hacker? Of course not. I am lvl 83 with under 300 allies and have 250kD. I would not know the first thing about hacking. I'll tell you this, I scored 80k WD and only lost to one attacker and had 250 wins but zero casualties...so I will never be fully allied. And guess what, any one who is fully allied, and stronger can't see me.

wwwmaverick
07-02-2013, 07:51 AM
I keep a lower ally count, 426 to be precise, I am 900k attack at this ally count and only bring indestructible units with this ally count, so I never lose a unit. I also primarily hunt hackers for big money. I can see all the way down to people in the 200 ally range all the way up to people with over 500. This ally count works for me, that's why I don't ally up all the way

Thief
07-02-2013, 07:56 AM
I could see going lower allies if you werent the Defensive Leader but had Great Stats and were in a top 100 faction or lower.

In a top 50 faction i would imagine they are organized enough to give the intel right off the bat so i don't see it being beneficial