PDA

View Full Version : What do we consider good stats these days?



Rastlin
04-14-2013, 02:40 AM
I was wondering what everyone is considering good stats these days, since the last few LTQ's have been major stat boosters? I used to go off of 2,000 times your level to get a ball park idea where to be at. I am starting to think this number might be to low now. Should I be looking at 2,500, or maybe 3,000 to multiply by level now? Ideas? Thoughts?

Klassenr@hotmail.com
04-14-2013, 02:43 AM
I would guess double the old standard. So 4000.

Kjctnorris
04-14-2013, 02:49 AM
I think we have to start using exponentials now.

LordB
04-14-2013, 03:14 AM
4,000 x level would be exceptional. 3,000 x level good I think. Although there's still time for gree to squeeze a few more overlapping ltqs in before the next war, so who knows?

Intrance
04-14-2013, 07:22 AM
The stat inflation is killing the game unfortunately...

Kjctnorris
04-14-2013, 07:58 AM
The stat inflation is killing the game unfortunately...Word......

LordB
04-14-2013, 09:18 AM
Lots of people certainly do seem to be leaving because of what Gree are making them put in to stay competitive...

Q-Ball
04-14-2013, 10:59 AM
The stat inflation is killing the game unfortunately...

I sort of agree. If everyone's stats are increasing or have the same opportunity to increase, then the doesn't that hold all things equal?

Kjctnorris
04-14-2013, 11:16 AM
I sort of agree. If everyone's stats are increasing or have the same opportunity to increase, then the doesn't that hold all things equal?not really. The bridge between heavy gem and completely free players is getting longer. Each LTQ seems to be getting more expensive to finish as well. That might just be my imagination though as I haven't done an exact count.

Shinazueli
04-14-2013, 11:22 AM
I sort of agree. If everyone's stats are increasing or have the same opportunity to increase, then the doesn't that hold all things equal?

As long as you have the money to pay for that equality.

LordB
04-14-2013, 11:24 AM
It increasingly separates gem users from non-gem users

Winstrol
04-14-2013, 11:40 AM
Please take the word "Lord" out of your name. You are not the LORD.
What the **** ?

Winstrol
04-14-2013, 11:43 AM
Greeting, brother. May the LORD be with you.
Please take the word "Brother" out of your post. You are not the BROTHER.

Winstrol
04-14-2013, 11:48 AM
We are all God's children, which makes us all brothers and sisters.
I'd say something about your "god" , but I don't want to get banned . So Better keep your bible non-sense to yourself.

Jixx
04-14-2013, 12:07 PM
any stats higher than mine are good stats, just as any stats lower than mine are bad stats.

isnt that how this works?

Rastlin
04-14-2013, 12:53 PM
Well thank you to everyone for High Jacking my thread... :rolleyes:
Back to the topic now please...since this is two pages long with only three people providing their own answer.

Winstrol
04-14-2013, 01:01 PM
600/600k stats are good stats .

Jeshu
04-14-2013, 01:05 PM
not really. The bridge between heavy gem and completely free players is getting longer. Each LTQ seems to be getting more expensive to finish as well. That might just be my imagination though as I haven't done an exact count.

It does feel that way... LTQs are getting more expensive each time

Rastlin
04-14-2013, 01:33 PM
600/600k stats are good stats .
For what level? Or are you saying at 600k doesn't really matter what level, as that is a strong atk/def for all?

Dracos
04-14-2013, 01:39 PM
Right now I'm 3,700atk x my lvl. And 3,400def x my lvl.
I think I'm in the top 90% of my lvl

Ratma2001
04-14-2013, 03:01 PM
600/600k stats are good stats .

And pretty much right on the mark Winstrol !, i am just a touch over this

LordB
04-14-2013, 03:02 PM
You're in the top 90%, or the top 10%?? The top 90% is a bit of a broad range :-)

Ratma2001
04-14-2013, 03:02 PM
Right now I'm 3,700atk x my lvl. And 3,400def x my lvl.
I think I'm in the top 90% of my lvl

That would make me in your Top 10% given the rule of thumb .

Eddie_m63
04-14-2013, 03:09 PM
I am at 4000xlevel, cool

LordB
04-14-2013, 04:00 PM
You're a legend. Especially if you're Level 1

-OP-
04-14-2013, 04:26 PM
3000 per level here. At level 86 though I don't see many that I worry about attacking or raiding.

RedRoom
04-14-2013, 07:57 PM
I would guess double the old standard. So 4000.

Been playing 2 weeks now, and at level 30 I am getting good units from the events, but still am at only 22k A/22k D. In hitting the events hard am I leveling up too fast? Just seems my numbers are way low...

Johan -
04-14-2013, 10:39 PM
I'm 3500 x lv, but too bad the LTQ let you level up so quickly. ( I like the rewards so I of course try to finish them)

Anyone advise what I can do to get my att/deff more levelled? I buy some dragons every day, but the gap between my att/deff I like to see more in line. Should I upgrade my defense buildings?

Shinazueli
04-14-2013, 10:50 PM
Equipment levels it nicely. Just spend 60 mil on it and that should do it. Lol.

Johan -
04-14-2013, 11:03 PM
I wish! difference between equipment att/deff is 7 max. only. Better to buy some more dragons for 13K each and spend some more gems on the LTQ

Shinazueli
04-14-2013, 11:21 PM
What?! Mail crusher 14/21 hawkslayer leather 10/25 that's 22 diff. X 1500 makes 33k difference up. It'll just cost you an arm and both legs and your firstborn.

Johan -
04-14-2013, 11:34 PM
Oh yes, I forgot the other one!! Anyway...52.5 million for 33K increase is a lot of gold!!!

Shinazueli
04-15-2013, 01:11 PM
Well..... Yes. But there's the answer. :)

-OP-
04-28-2013, 11:15 PM
3000 per level here. At level 86 though I don't see many that I worry about attacking or raiding.
Now at level 96 and at 4200 per level. LTQ is really bringing them up quick.

Just thought I would see how I compared to 10 levels ago.

sister morphine
04-28-2013, 11:34 PM
At level 125 and over 5,300 per level 👍

My other on 103 is around 3,600 per level but I don't use many gems there

Polaris79
04-29-2013, 12:59 AM
I'm not even at 2k or lvl...