Top guilds?

[procsyzarc]

Don't follow KA forum even though it is quickly becoming my favorite of the 4 games.
I am looking at buying 50 vaults this weekend but am wondering are there many strong guilds out there and if so who are they?

Not looking for an invite as I am already happily in TBC but just wondering how much of a shot we have at top 10 or even 3? Have come 4th in every WD event in MW and CC so far so would be nice to keep that pattern :)

[emcee]

We are going to try our best to get to top 10 procsyzarc. We have more than a few heavy hitters in The Buckwheat Connection (TBC)

We are still looking for a select few to fill our ranks.

9% casualty decrease.
22% build time decrease
18% build cost decrease

We also are working with a camper guild with similar bonuses which will offer players who want to take a break from war (personal, vacation or financial reasons) to be still a part of the family.

[Perfuzzie]

Don't follow KA forum even though it is quickly becoming my favorite of the 4 games.
I am looking at buying 50 vaults this weekend but am wondering are there many strong guilds out there and if so who are they?

Not looking for an invite as I am already happily in TBC but just wondering how much of a shot we have at top 10 or even 3? Have come 4th in every WD event in MW and CC so far so would be nice to keep that pattern :)

top 3 are not really worth the spending so top 10 is the goal to go :)
procsyzarc i see u moved from MQ here.. i know u are a heavy gem spender , good luck with your guild :)

[procsyzarc]

top 3 are not really worth the spending so top 10 is the goal to go :)
procsyzarc i see u moved from MQ here.. i know u are a heavy gem spender , good luck with your guild :)

I still play all only one I won't spend money on is CC. That was my plan buy the 50 vaults in KA but put most of the bonus in MQ and a bit in MW

[Dubzlife]

310k attack 275k defense 16k iPh medium gem spender looking for a top 10 guild. Message me if your interestedc

[l3lade2]

MoC are hoping to be up there, I think realisitcally Top 25 but Top 10 would be nice...a lot of it I suppose will depend on the match-ups in a any single war, some a guild will fair better in than others...especially this stupid first war when so many guilds will be missing members due to the moronic timing of GREEd.

The Top 5, and perhaps the Top 10, will of course be dominated by heavy gem spending guilds, there are several out there as we all know who put a lot of cash into KA, it only stands to reason that these guys will be competing amongst each other for the top spots.

[Jixx]

MoC are hoping to be up there, I think realisitcally Top 25 but Top 10 would be nice...a lot of it I suppose will depend on the match-ups in a any single war, some a guild will fair better in than others...especially this stupid first war when so many guilds will be missing members due to the moronic timing of GREEd.

The Top 5, and perhaps the Top 10, will of course be dominated by heavy gem spending guilds, there are several out there as we all know who put a lot of cash into KA, it only stands to reason that these guys will be competing amongst each other for the top spots.

I'd certainly hope getting to top 10, if you'd ask me our minimum achievement has to be top 100, 25 is quite possible as well from the intell we've gathered. Good thing we're super organized :)

[GreenGuru]

To be honest, it'd be easy to say that the majority of the well known guilds that have been making the rounds here on the forums will make it in the top 10 due to organization and membership of some top players. But you can't realistically known where you can expect to place until the first event is done because of the number of silent (not on the forums) guilds with silent players who we know nothing about because they don't ever post here. Since the forum is a great place to meet other players and organize as opposed to the way the silents ones work though it's not a bad bet that you might hit top 10 if you are in one of the well organized strong guilds in the forums.

[Jixx]

To be honest, it'd be easy to say that the majority of the well known guilds that have been making the rounds here on the forums will make it in the top 10 due to organizations and membership of some top players. But you can't realistically known where you can expect to place until the first event is done because of the number of silent (not on the forums) guilds with silent players who we know nothing about because they don't ever post here. Since the forum is a great place to meet other players and organize as opposed to the way the silents ones work though it's not a bad bet that you might hit top 10 if you are in one of the well organized strong guilds in the forums.

our guild is certainly one of the more organized ones, but seeing all those stats from forum people makes me wonder wether we'll achieve top 10 :P

[flamingdragon]

Who do you think will be the 1st place guild probably FUN or royal knights

[GreenGuru]

Who do you think will be the 1st place guild probably FUN or royal knights

The general consensus of the forums seems to be that either FUN (boasting the1nONLY) or Royal Knights (boasting Pendragon) will take the first spot, but only time will tell. We know this much for sure though, gem spending will make a huge difference in the CK (Conquest of Kings, omitted the "o" because I realized it might be censored lol) so the top gem spending strong guild will probably be the one to take the cake, or rather territory.

[Ratma2001]

But isn't the Guild war based on POINTS? If you have a medium level Guild battling a slightly higher and win more points per battle than say FUN/RK someone will have blast whilst other will be sayin that couldn't happen?
Why BUY the victory ? Yes cause you can , but where's the challenge ? Where the excitement ? Just because my wallets bigger than yours doesn't mean I actually am guaranteed the WIN, either way there is going to be some tears and some winging, David and Goliath or Goliath and Goliath , cheap entertainment for me and it will cost me ZERO bring on the WARS and get some' tall poppies !

[Winstrol]

Just because my wallets bigger than yours doesn't mean I actually am guaranteed the WIN,

That's not true ;p , gems=points no gems no points , simple .

[Shinazueli]

Yeah the top 25 guilds in cc spent an average of 15k gems per member in the last event.

[Nacon10]

in the KA wars i think that if your guild has avg stats of 250k you shoud safely place in top 100. the top 10 will all be gem spenders .

[procsyzarc]

Yeah the top 25 guilds in cc spent an average of 15k gems per member in the last event.

No they didn't. I have been in a top 5 team in every single event so far and none of them have we spent an avarage of 15k per member, sure some may have but the avarage would be more like 3-5k and that is top 5, top 25 will probably be a third of that. I could be wrong but think and am hoping there are a lot more big spenders in MW and CC so KA may be cheaper.


But isn't the Guild war based on POINTS? If you have a medium level Guild battling a slightly higher and win more points per battle than say FUN/RK someone will have blast whilst other will be sayin that couldn't happen?
Why BUY the victory ? Yes cause you can , but where's the challenge ? Where the excitement ? Just because my wallets bigger than yours doesn't mean I actually am guaranteed the WIN, either way there is going to be some tears and some winging, David and Goliath or Goliath and Goliath , cheap entertainment for me and it will cost me ZERO bring on the WARS and get some' tall poppies !

No it is purely based on how much gems you spend, no amount of planning, teamwork or stratagy will make up for spending less gems than your competitors

[Shinazueli]

Pretty much. But if you didn't spend those gems, then someone else did. 43 million points makes that kind of obvious.

[Jixx]

Pretty much. But if you didn't spend those gems, then someone else did. 43 million points makes that kind of obvious.

if i get top 100 with my guild without any gem spending, i'll laugh. If we get top 25, i'd say to hell with upgrading anything, hardcore raiding and putting gold in the guild it is.

[Shinazueli]

If you get top 25 with no gems from any member I'll eat my phone. Just so you know. It's not possible.

[Mickeytah]

in the KA wars i think that if your guild has avg stats of 250k you shoud safely place in top 100. the top 10 will all be gem spenders .

I like your prediction. It means my guild will finish quite well, then. We are crazy strong.

[VileDoom]

If you get top 25 with no gems from any member I'll eat my phone. Just so you know. It's not possible.

^this, it's just not possible w/o gems. 1 player willing to spend money on gems can score the same amount as 10 free players in just one battle. A really ambitious gem player could eclipse an entire guild of free players. :/

[Shinazueli]

Now for the real numbers. If you are a completely free guild full of casual players, you can safely expect to finish top 4000. If you are a completely free guild with three or four dedicated players, you can expect to finish in the top 1000. If you are a completely free guild with absolutely dedicated players, you can expect to also finish in the top 1000, unless you don't sleep. If you are a mostly free guild with one to two players willing to spend, you can expect to finish in the top 500. If you are mostly gem guild but not crazy about it you can expect to finish in the top 100. If you have some absolute ballers and aren't afraid to drop a car payment for this game per member, you can expect to finish top 25. If you are totally full of Bill Gates and aren't afraid to drop half of one of my paychecks per member, you can expect to finish top 10. And above that it's a mortgage payment per member. Just to put these things in perspective.

And finally, just because you think it's crazy to spend that much on One Event, doesn't mean there isn't someone out there with more money than sense just itching to drop some cash.

And for those that think my numbers are wrong, go read the MW forums. Gree makes a half to three quarters of a million dollars per event. It's crazy, but true.

Also, to lay this one to rest : your guild's stats mean next to nothing in terms of rank. You'll always get matched against an even guild. Only the amount of cash you are willing to spend (and for free players, the amount of sleep you are willing to do without) will matter.

[VVolf]

Now for the real numbers. If you are a completely free guild full of casual players, you can safely expect to finish top 4000. If you are a completely free guild with three or four dedicated players, you can expect to finish in the top 1000. If you are a completely free guild with absolutely dedicated players, you can expect to also finish in the top 1000, unless you don't sleep. If you are a mostly free guild with one to two players willing to spend, you can expect to finish in the top 500. If you are mostly gem guild but not crazy about it you can expect to finish in the top 100. If you have some absolute ballers and aren't afraid to drop a car payment for this game per member, you can expect to finish top 25. If you are totally full of Bill Gates and aren't afraid to drop half of one of my paychecks per member, you can expect to finish top 10. And above that it's a mortgage payment per member. Just to put these things in perspective.

And finally, just because you think it's crazy to spend that much on One Event, doesn't mean there isn't someone out there with more money than sense just itching to drop some cash.

And for those that think my numbers are wrong, go read the MW forums. Gree makes a half to three quarters of a million dollars per event. It's crazy, but true.

Also, to lay this one to rest : your guild's stats mean next to nothing in terms of rank. You'll always get matched against an even guild. Only the amount of cash you are willing to spend (and for free players, the amount of sleep you are willing to do without) will matter.

So... if what you say is true, is there anyone playing MW who is a free player? I feel like the guild events push gem spending even more, and this will only widen the gap between free and gem players further. Which will likely crush free player spirits into the ground, if they aren't already. haha, is that a foreshadowing of what is to come in KA?

[Jhoemel]

So... if what you say is true, is there anyone playing MW who is a free player? I feel like the guild events push gem spending even more, and this will only widen the gap between free and gem players further. Which will likely crush free player spirits into the ground, if they aren't already. haha, is that a foreshadowing of what is to come in KA?

I play mw for free though

[VileDoom]

So... if what you say is true, is there anyone playing MW who is a free player? I feel like the guild events push gem spending even more, and this will only widen the gap between free and gem players further. Which will likely crush free player spirits into the ground, if they aren't already. haha, is that a foreshadowing of what is to come in KA?

GREE is only interested in the here and now. Once this game burns out they will make another with the same mechanics but new appearance. Rinse and repeat.

Edit: these LTQ's have only put it on a faster track to death.

[Ratma2001]

That's not true ;p , gems=points no gems no points , simple .

So if we both spend gems, which we do ! Who wins ? Your level 200 with xxxxA/D so your matched accordingly . I'm level 160 with xxxxxA/D but I can attack you for more points but your attack on me is virtually worthless so I win?? Correct
If I spend as fast you but earn my point cause I can hit higher player with higher stats, where do yours come from....you would only be within 150-200K from top ranked ?? Is this correct

[Intan jabrut]

I play mw for free though
Hi Jhoemel,
If you don't mind , Can you tell me what kind of rewards that you ever got from guild war in MW please ? coz I am a free player as well so I want to know what rewards can I get from guild war in KA.

[Jhoemel]

Hi Jhoemel,
If you don't mind , Can you tell me what kind of rewards that you ever got from guild war in MW please ? coz I am a free player as well so I want to know what rewards can I get from guild war in KA.

I have top 10 rewards and top 25 rewards, maybe top 100 this time around

[Intan jabrut]

I have top 10 rewards and top 25 rewards, maybe top 100 this time around
Wow thats good. Hopefully I can grab top 250 coz that unit very nice look....
Thank you for your information.

[AppleMacGuy]

Also, to lay this one to rest : your guild's stats mean next to nothing in terms of rank. You'll always get matched against an even guild. Only the amount of cash you are willing to spend (and for free players, the amount of sleep you are willing to do without) will matter.

Well, as a member of Fight Club, winners of the first war in CC, I can tell you that we had some crazy match-ups against syndicates that were _way_ down on stats compared to us. Indeed, we didn't get matched up against several of the top 10 when we should have done :confused:

[jonny0284]

Well, as a member of Fight Club, winners of the first war in CC, I can tell you that we had some crazy match-ups against syndicates that were _way_ down on stats compared to us. Indeed, we didn't get matched up against several of the top 10 when we should have done :confused:

The first rule of Fight Club is you do not talk about Fight Club. We'll chalk it up as a rookie mistake.

[Shinazueli]

There are occasional mismatches, of course, especially as you get to the extremes, otherwise you'd always get matched against the same guilds. But for the average player, it's usually an even match.

If you play free, count on getting the top 1000 and top 4000 prizes. Anything after that means someone else paid for your unit.

And as far as the stats go, the only stat that matters is the lowest person in the guild. At higher levels of competition the opposing guild will find this person quickly, and then all of the attacks will go against that person. You are only as strong as your weakest link.

[Mickeytah]

Hi Jhoemel,
If you don't mind , Can you tell me what kind of rewards that you ever got from guild war in MW please ? coz I am a free player as well so I want to know what rewards can I get from guild war in KA.

http://www.funzio.com/forum/showthread.php?49371-Battle-for-Dragon-s-Roost-Aggregate-Rewards-list

[Coog]

Just want som clarification on this. If two heavy weight clans get paired up, they gain no advantage in the battle for points than two weak guilds beating the crap out of each other? A weak guild fighting another weak guild can finish above a powerfull one, who has a much tougher opponent to handle? Is that right?

[Shinazueli]

Just want som clarification on this. If two heavy weight clans get paired up, they gain no advantage in the battle for points than two weak guilds beating the crap out of each other? A weak guild fighting another weak guild can finish above a powerfull one, who has a much tougher opponent to handle? Is that right?

I'll say it again: The sole determinant of your final guild ranking is how much you spent to achieve it.

And because I'm feeling nice and see that you are obviously from Sweden, the word is spelled "some".

[GreenGuru]

Just want som clarification on this. If two heavy weight clans get paired up, they gain no advantage in the battle for points than two weak guilds beating the crap out of each other? A weak guild fighting another weak guild can finish above a powerfull one, who has a much tougher opponent to handle? Is that right?

Since it hasn't happened yet I can't confirm this as a fact but... I believe the assumption is that while you get conquest points for winning battles against your opponent and more if your opponent is stronger. I believe the number of conquest points you gain is also correlated to the level and maybe the stats of your opponent. so for example:

Weak Guild: level 40 60k A/D beats level 50 50k A/D, wins 20 Conquest Points
Strong Guild: level 180 500k 600k A/D beats level 200 400k A/D wins 200 Conquest Points

this is in no way a representation of how many points you'll ACTUALLY win in the coming battle per fight nor the difference between two but rather my little hypothesis example of how I believe more conquest appoints are awarded per battle won to the guilds with stronger and higher level players.

[GreenGuru]

If you get top 25 with no gems from any member I'll eat my phone. Just so you know. It's not possible.

Motion to reserve a top 25 spot for a guild like this so we can watch Shin eat his phone :p hahahaha

[flamingdragon]

Motion to reserve a top 25 spot for a guild like this so we can watch Shin eat his phone :p hahahaha

sure we will do it

[Mickeytah]

Motion to reserve a top 25 spot for a guild like this so we can watch Shin eat his phone :p hahahaha

I second that motion.

[AppleMacGuy]

The first rule of Fight Club is you do not talk about Fight Club. We'll chalk it up as a rookie mistake.

Lol...rules are made to be broken ;)

[chimera69]

Since it hasn't happened yet I can't confirm this as a fact but... I believe the assumption is that while you get conquest points for winning battles against your opponent and more if your opponent is stronger. I believe the number of conquest points you gain is also correlated to the level and maybe the stats of your opponent. so for example:

Weak Guild: level 40 60k A/D beats level 50 50k A/D, wins 20 Conquest Points
Strong Guild: level 180 500k 600k A/D beats level 200 400k A/D wins 200 Conquest Points

this is in no way a representation of how many points you'll ACTUALLY win in the coming battle per fight nor the difference between two but rather my little hypothesis example of how I believe more conquest appoints are awarded per battle won to the guilds with stronger and higher level players.

If it's the same as in MW & CC, it doesn't work like that - higher stat or levels don't mean you get more points at all. Bigger differences in levels will give you more points. So if you're level 80 & beat someone who's level 140, you win more points than if you beat someone who's level 95.

Theoretically, low stat teams could win just as much as very high stat teams assuming they each put in lots of $$ for repeated hits - in the end, it really is all about the money. But there are only so many matchups that can take place during the set amount of event time. So, lower stat players are more likely to get some matches where there's no one on the opposing team that they can win against.

[Jixx]

If it's the same as in MW & CC, it doesn't work like that - higher stat or levels don't mean you get more points at all. Bigger differences in levels will give you more points. So if you're level 80 & beat someone who's level 140, you win more points than if you beat someone who's level 95.

Theoretically, low stat teams could win just as much as very high stat teams assuming they each put in lots of $$ for repeated hits - in the end, it really is all about the money. But there are only so many matchups that can take place during the set amount of event time. So, lower stat players are more likely to get some matches where there's no one on the opposing team that they can win against.

the sad thing here is that levels have absolutely no representation of stats. There are many lower level players who could easily beat me, only because i didnt have a clue as to what i was doing till i got to level 85ish.

[Shinazueli]

Since it hasn't happened yet I can't confirm this as a fact but... I believe the assumption is that while you get conquest points for winning battles against your opponent and more if your opponent is stronger. I believe the number of conquest points you gain is also correlated to the level and maybe the stats of your opponent. so for example:

Weak Guild: level 40 60k A/D beats level 50 50k A/D, wins 20 Conquest Points
Strong Guild: level 180 500k 600k A/D beats level 200 400k A/D wins 200 Conquest Points

this is in no way a representation of how many points you'll ACTUALLY win in the coming battle per fight nor the difference between two but rather my little hypothesis example of how I believe more conquest appoints are awarded per battle won to the guilds with stronger and higher level players.

The variation is much smaller than that. It's like 150 (with the wall down, ofc) for a low level (weaker) player, up to 200-ish for a stronger player. I've never seen a number higher than 200 or lower than 150, YMMV. So, again, only cash matters.

[Shinazueli]

I second that motion.

Hey wait a minute... No, don't. If you post SS of your guild before and after the event, with unit SS per member, and you get top 25, I'll post a video on YouTube of me eating my phone. I'm not even remotely worried about it.

Not that you'd be able to definitively prove that you didn't spend gems, but that's how confident I am.

[Ratma2001]

Send us the link for you tube ! This should be entertaining, gotta get some popcorn and fries!

[Jixx]

I do certainly wonder why they changed the rewards.

[It's all a dream]

The variation is much smaller than that. It's like 150 (with the wall down, ofc) for a low level (weaker) player, up to 200-ish for a stronger player. I've never seen a number higher than 200 or lower than 150, YMMV. So, again, only cash matters.

sorry im missing your point.

first everybody in a guild can attack anybody in the opposing guild if defense leader is down. level is no issue at this point.
Level is an issue in getting points. if you are low level and can beat a high level you will win more points than someone with higher level beating the same guy. the range of points varies a lot. in mw i get on average 150-200 points when wall is up. when wall is down i will get 400 points. a faction member of mine got even up to 650 points. (of course it depends if you find a suitable target)

If you are strong as a low level player you will have a big advantage.

[procsyzarc]

Just want som clarification on this. If two heavy weight clans get paired up, they gain no advantage in the battle for points than two weak guilds beating the crap out of each other? A weak guild fighting another weak guild can finish above a powerfull one, who has a much tougher opponent to handle? Is that right?

No it is purely by points scored, winning means absolutely nothing except maybe bragging rights if the team cares.

Two heavy weight guilds spending a lot of gems may score 2.1m vs 2m the two light weight guilds may score 150k vs 100k. Even though the loser of the heavy weights lost they still scored more than 10 x the points of the winner of the light weights. So as far as the final placing a go they are still 1.85m points ahead after that one match.

In theory a team could lose every single battle and still get first.

[Ill Spoken Of]

Looks like TBC will be out of top 25 in MW this go round. I think I am a bit happy about the over lap of KA and MW. Major spender moving cash to a different game can not be a help.

[Mickeytah]

Hey wait a minute... No, don't. If you post SS of your guild before and after the event, with unit SS per member, and you get top 25, I'll post a video on YouTube of me eating my phone. I'm not even remotely worried about it.

Not that you'd be able to definitively prove that you didn't spend gems, but that's how confident I am.

I'm not posting squat about my guild. I'd like to not be kicked out. Haha

[goowokji]

No it is purely by points scored, winning means absolutely nothing except maybe bragging rights if the team cares.

Two heavy weight guilds spending a lot of gems may score 2.1m vs 2m the two light weight guilds may score 150k vs 100k. Even though the loser of the heavy weights lost they still scored more than 10 x the points of the winner of the light weights. So as far as the final placing a go they are still 1.85m points ahead after that one match.

In theory a team could lose every single battle and still get first.

When you say heavy weight and light weight are you referring to gem spending or their att/def ?

[Q Raider]

In Modern War the faction I am in has a number of free players in it, one of whom posted earlier in this thread.

We set no absolute requirement for the purchase of Gold (gems) as it is a matter of choice, instead we set realistic goals for events and in each case have achieved them using, above all else, good organization and unselfish game strategies in the actual battle scenarios. We consistently placed in front of teams who have specified a minimum 2 Vault per person per event regime.

Whilst this upcoming MW event will be different as our current faction underwent a merger and now operates as a two tiered group, with one targeting a higher finish position than the other, the same strategies will apply and I expect we will again outperform factions who spend "unwisely" once the mechanics of the game are revealed.

Whilst comments relating to Gems being the deciding factor are generally correct, it is how those gems are utilized which is the key, and frankly, I think a few of the uber factions will come unstuck as "the bonfire of the vanities" takes precedence over selfless play and damn good strategy...

In summary 1000 gems wisely spent can outweigh more than double that from a less organized guild.

As info:
Brazil Planned top 25 finished 23th
Greenland Planned top 10 finished 6th (Because the unit was worth chasing)
Egypt Planned top 25 finished 18th (might have been a bit higher)

[procsyzarc]

In Modern War the faction I am in has a number of free players in it, one of whom posted earlier in this thread.

We set no absolute requirement for the purchase of Gold (gems) as it is a matter of choice, instead we set realistic goals for events and in each case have achieved them using, above all else, good organization and unselfish game strategies in the actual battle scenarios. We consistently placed in front of teams who have specified a minimum 2 Vault per person per event regime.

Whilst this upcoming MW event will be different as our current faction underwent a merger and now operates as a two tiered group, with one targeting a higher finish position than the other, the same strategies will apply and I expect we will again outperform factions who spend "unwisely" once the mechanics of the game are revealed.

Whilst comments relating to Gems being the deciding factor are generally correct, it is how those gems are utilized which is the key, and frankly, I think a few of the uber factions will come unstuck as "the bonfire of the vanities" takes precedence over selfless play and damn good strategy...

In summary 1000 gems wisely spent can outweigh more than double that from a less organized guild.

As info:
Brazil Planned top 25 finished 23th
Greenland Planned top 10 finished 6th (Because the unit was worth chasing)
Egypt Planned top 25 finished 18th (might have been a bit higher)


Sorry but completely disagree.

Gems are all that matter. In CC I refuse to spend any money so for my team I did everything possible to make up for it and logged in every hour to ensure hp was never full and I was at 100% efficiency.

My score was absolutely crap spending just 1000 gold and taking a half assed aproach i scored more points in the first MW battle (and that was without the 25% faction bonus CC gets, both accounts were L200 BTW) than I did with a perfect free approach record to CC (ie walls always down, always attacking a L200 and hp never full),


Bottom line real money is all that matters.

[Baldric]

The knights of Ni Guild 913488245
Currently 25 out of 28 capacity members > lvl 100
We have been preparing for war and have 40 walls, 5 at maximum lvl
Our Guardian has > 160k Defense and > 170k Attack
All our members are active and contribute to the guild
Baldric runs the Guild democratically, everyone is heard.
18% upgrade time Bonus
9% upgrade cost bonus

ACCEPTING > LVL 100 APPLICATIONS

[GreenGuru]

The knights of Ni Guild 913488245
Currently 25 out of 28 capacity members > lvl 100
We have been preparing for war and have 40 walls, 5 at maximum lvl
Our Guardian has > 160k Defense and > 170k Attack
All our members are active and contribute to the guild
Baldric runs the Guild democratically, everyone is heard.
18% upgrade time Bonus
9% upgrade cost bonus

ACCEPTING > LVL 100 APPLICATIONS

Your guild doesn't come anywhere close to the top guilds, sorry to burst your bubble. Actually I'm not sorry since you're advertising in the general forum... move your post to the appropriate section of the forum (Guild Recruitment section)

[procsyzarc]

ACCEPTING > LVL 100 APPLICATIONS

You will regret that requirement.......actually since with those guild stats you are probably aiming for top 1500 it really doesn't matter.

[Winstrol]

You will regret that requirement.......actually since with those guild stats you are probably aiming for top 1500 it really doesn't matter.
there's no prize for top 1500 ;)

[Shinazueli]

We know, Winstrol.

[SoccerStud]

I think that may have been the joke :rolleyes:

[flamingdragon]

my guild will probably be in the top 500
guild war starting in 9 minutes