Great Empire Times Message

[Lars]

Best Message I ever had in the Empire Times: Somebody attacked me, lost, and I gained $480,000! (Snapshot with censored names attached). Looks like there is no $30,000 cap for the losses for the attacker. Funny that the same rival already lost when he attacked me 2 days ago.

[mnju_03]

Best Message I ever had in the Empire Times: Somebody attacked me, lost, and I gained $480,000! (Snapshot with censored names attached). Looks like there is no $30,000 cap for the losses for the attacker. Funny that the same rival already lost when he attacked me 2 days ago.

That's fricken awesome!!!

[deuces]

LOL what an absurd fail.

[Dorian Gray]

lol That is pretty epic, wow!

[Maniaxe]

I would almost feel bad attacking him back now that he's on your feed...... wait no, I would not feel bad, I would be smiling!

[Nicholost]

Did he post to your wall afterward with "with love, XOXO?" That's quite the generous gift.

[Whoopdido1980]

I assume he thought he was strong enough to both no bank and blind attack. Oops.

[kaz]

Holy sh**! That's EPIC!
Tell this guy to go and attack me too :)

[iteachem]

So what percent do you lose in a failed attack..
How much would he have had no banked..

[Nicholost]

So what percent do you lose in a failed attack..
How much would he have had no banked..

10% or $30K, whichever is smaller. Same as when someone attacks you while you are no-banking. In other words, it's the same both ways.

[Euchred]

This same thing happened to me about 2 weeks ago I just assumed it was a money hacker attacking me. But when i went to his hood he didn't have any on him it was odd.

[spindom]

happened to me last week, got 1.03 million..
no questions asked:D

[Brosiss]

Lucky chaps. I would love to donate in this way

[Murda]

10% or $30K, whichever is smaller. Same as when someone attacks you while you are no-banking. In other words, it's the same both ways.

Nicholost, are you saying this guy repeatedly lost 30K until it totaled $480,000 and then appeared as one lump sum on the news feed. Cause if the same rules apply to attackers as it does to victims a loss should be capped at $30,000.

[mnju_03]

Nicholost, are you saying this guy repeatedly lost 30K until it totaled $480,000 and then appeared as one lump sum on the news feed. Cause if the same rules apply to attackers as it does to victims a loss should be capped at $30,000.

Or he just had so much on hand at the time that that's what the % was that he lost....?

[Euchred]

The max you can lose/win per fight is 30k so he attcked you 16 times in a row losing 30k each time.

[i need muney]

Losses are capped at 30k
You can be attacked 10 times for up to 300k
But your rival can lose any number of times only capped by his stamina.
Duh! ;)

[Mouse]

Happened to me just then $330000 the guy said to me "i was intentionally trying to lose money thanks it's hard to find strong players"

[i need muney]

Come to think of it, just around thecorner, I was hit by a guy who said he did an experiment. Threw me nearly $500000.
Somethings going down -_ -

[Nicholost]

Murda, Euchred and i need muney are correct.

[Murda]

Those are some determined losers. I'd love to have a surprise deposit like that

[Kataya]

This person is trying to give away $$, he's given my boyfriend over 3mil in the last few days! I don't understand it.

[Lars]

First I thought he is a blind attacker. Now I checked my old messages and recognized my memory wasn't completely accurate here: He did not fail an attack on me before but he lost a *robbery*.

Maybe a misclick? But why would he have so much money on hand when a is not strong enough to win a robbery against me? And a single misclick should not earn me more than $30k and I doubt somebody would be able to have 16 misclicks in a row. Maybe a glitch?

I just visited him and posted him a message to find out more.