Casualty Rates after 1.5 patch

[iansgkim]

Dunno if I'm asking the same questions over and over..

Until today, from about 20 PVP battles I lost 20~30 amphibious soldier(assume most of ppl around my L stocks it up to save other units..) and sometimes high-cost, or valor units like super hornet.
Today, I lost like 10 amph from over 100 battles.

Plus, I fought a LOT of people not putting their money into their vaults.. (It was like a feast for me :D)
guessing moneys somehow got out of vaults when funzio reset everything.. (only a guess.)

1. This low casualty rates.. is it just me? or everyone else is experiencing the same thing?
2. If #1 works for everyone, is it going to work just for events time? or it will go one for a while?
3. If latter for #2, is it really worth putting time & effort & gold for events? "20% casualty off unit" suddenly doesn't seem really effective.

[HGF69]

Smaller in terms of numbers, bigger in terms of the unit, eg costly items over 50,000K x 2 each time and also valour units and loot items have a higher rate

[Ramshutu]

I've seen no discernible difference against previous days of raiding.

[JohnnyR]

My experience:

Phase 1- max allies, max units up to about level 65. Lost chinnooks, apcs, warthogs and occasional big unit every fight, at least 2-3 per attack (mix of meatshield, med unit, and expensive unit).

Phase 2- until level 72, 90 allies, lost 180 strike eagles in about 1400-1600 battles/raids. Couldn't believe the losses. Collected tons of pvp loot, doubled my income and stole millions easily. Picking people off was a piece of cake once I became numb to the strike eagle drop rate. Lost maybe 5 Super Hornets.

Phase 3- level 72-76 (current), 290 allies, losing pvp loot, rangers, humvees, and cheap stuff. Maybe 100-130 raids and battles, lost 2 Super Hornets and a few other hi value units, 1-2 units per attack. Attacking only 60% D to my A, and it's been great. My pvp loss issue is non-existant.


I sure hope it's a permanent fix that took place, once my pvp loot dies out, I don't wanna have to realign my alliance again. Clipping hundreds of allies only to add em all back is worth it though.

[CJ54]

Smaller in terms of numbers, bigger in terms of the unit, eg costly items over 50,000K x 2 each time and also valour units and loot items have a higher rate

Nothing was raised.

[zynshmily]

speaking for myself(a lv135), i clearly feel the major improvement in the PVP casualty. the casualty rate kinda went back to the way it was when the game first started.
i know its naive to wish this uncanny casualty rate to be a permanent thing. lets just hope it lasts throughout the whole event period.

[P4TR1C14N]

I don't see any difference in losses. Same 'imho' broken behaviour still.

[Dillinja]

Nothing was raised.
or fixed....
Still losing too many valuable units, I think it's time we accepted this is the way the game is going to be.
If funzio wanted to 'fix' the PVP losses it would have been done by now.

[zynshmily]

its weird then.
im L135 with an attack score of 58k. for the past week, i tended to attack players with low alliance number and low defense, but even when the opponent's def was only 5k, i still had loss. basically, outa every 10 battles, i lost 1-2 trivial units and one precious unit.
throughout the entire past week, my major losses were 100 submarine, 60 super hornet, 30 osprey VTOL, 30 seal,30 leopard tanks,20 anti-aircraft vehicle, 10 stryker. plus uncounted less valuable units...Now i list it out, i dont kno what went wrong in my mind to keep fighting with such a huge loss...

after the update, i started sensing the improvement. over the past 300 battles, i suffered literally ZERO casualty. in addition, i attacked several lv130+ with a defense score of nearly 40k. still no casualty at all...i have refilled my stamina a couple times, and i'm aiming at some lv196,lv188,lv143,lv140,lv138 to finish through my long stagnant valor goals. wonder when i will lose the first unit in a battle after the update.

Am i the only one going through this?

[zynshmily]

just spent up 40 stamina pts.
four ten consecutive fights against lv188(30k def),lv170(22k def),lv138(39k def) and lv143(44k def).
ZERO CASUALTIES...
i am having the best time :D

[ObamaSux]

just spent up 40 stamina pts.
four ten consecutive fights against lv188(30k def),lv170(22k def),lv138(39k def) and lv143(44k def).
ZERO CASUALTIES...
i am having the best time :D

Wish I knew how you pulled that off... I'm L87, 16K Attack/Defense. In my last raid on a L6 Military Market, I lost 2 Sea Scouts, 1 sniper, 1 drone, 1 APC and 4 Fighter Planes. Guy's defense was 6K.

Glad you're having the best time :-/

[JMC]

its weird then.
im L135 with an attack score of 58k. for the past week, i tended to attack players with low alliance number and low defense, but even when the opponent's def was only 5k, i still had loss. basically, outa every 10 battles, i lost 1-2 trivial units and one precious unit.
throughout the entire past week, my major losses were 100 submarine, 60 super hornet, 30 osprey VTOL, 30 seal,30 leopard tanks,20 anti-aircraft vehicle, 10 stryker. plus uncounted less valuable units...Now i list it out, i dont kno what went wrong in my mind to keep fighting with such a huge loss...

after the update, i started sensing the improvement. over the past 300 battles, i suffered literally ZERO casualty. in addition, i attacked several lv130+ with a defense score of nearly 40k. still no casualty at all...i have refilled my stamina a couple times, and i'm aiming at some lv196,lv188,lv143,lv140,lv138 to finish through my long stagnant valor goals. wonder when i will lose the first unit in a battle after the update.

Am i the only one going through this?

Casualty rate seems the same as it's been for the last few weeks to me. I haven't been attacking much though, i'll go try it out later.

[azy]

Did he say "level 196"? That's ridiculous.

[JMC]

Still bad for me. A few weeks ago for a little while, there was actually lower casualties if you attacked someone who was closer in strength to you instead of someone much weaker. That didn't work. Did a total of only 3 attacks and lost 2 M270 MLRSs a stryker, 4 figher jets and 2 snipers.

2 attacks were on someone with closer stats to me and other was on a weak player.

[zynshmily]

Still bad for me. A few weeks ago for a little while, there was actually lower casualties if you attacked someone who was closer in strength to you instead of someone much weaker. That didn't work. Did a total of only 3 attacks and lost 2 M270 MLRSs a stryker, 4 figher jets and 2 snipers.

2 attacks were on someone with closer stats to me and other was on a weak player.

curiouser and curiouser...
i had more than 400 battles over the past 24 hrs, basically all focused on players above lv124. some of them had 50k def and i lost three times. Even in the battles i lost, no units loss. Still haven't lost one single unit. Maybe its compensation to the huge loss i suffered last week...:confused:

[JMC]

curiouser and curiouser...
i had more than 400 battles over the past 24 hrs, basically all focused on players above lv124. some of them had 50k def and i lost three times. Even in the battles i lost, no units loss. Still haven't lost one single unit. Maybe its compensation to the huge loss i suffered last week...:confused:

Or you're experiencing a really good glitch