Duke.0
11-27-2011, 04:52 PM
The thread bout G Wiz started about baiting inspired me to perform a test.
As an experiment, last night i had $450,000 on hand for most of the night.
Here is the results:
I am level 74 with 215 mafia
7200+ Atk
8500+ Def
I was attacked a total of 7 times in 8 hours
Wins 7
Losses 0
This is a small sample and a small amount of time but it draws some questions and observations for me...
1. You can get attacked 10 times in a row, then you are immune to attacks for X amount of hours after.
What time span between attacks count towards this 10 times in a row?
How many hours after are you immune to attacks?
2. How much money do you need to not bank because its not economical?
The max you can get from one attack is $30,000 (in other words if you had $300,000 and lost attacks, you can loose 10% of it each attack and be left with nothing!).
The bank takes 10% of your total.
I would think you would need 3,000,000 or more on hand to NOT use the bank. Why? The bank takes 10% so...it would eat 300,000. That is the max you can get stolen from an attack. Therefore If you collect from your buildings and your over 3,000,000 i would think banking would not be economical.
If you collected from your buildings and got 4,000,000 do you bank or not? Lets see using the example below;
A) $4,000,000 deposited in the bank
Bank eats 10% therefore its a $400,000 Loss
$3,600,000 total in the bank
B) $4,000,000 on hand and you get attacked AND LOOSE 10 times
$30,000 per loss is maximum currently
$300,000 total loss
$3,700,000 total on hand
Conclusion:
Anything under $3,000,000 you should probably bank always to prevent stolen money from attacks.
Anything over $3,000,000 you should probably not use the bank.
Agree? Disagree? Lets Discuss!
As an experiment, last night i had $450,000 on hand for most of the night.
Here is the results:
I am level 74 with 215 mafia
7200+ Atk
8500+ Def
I was attacked a total of 7 times in 8 hours
Wins 7
Losses 0
This is a small sample and a small amount of time but it draws some questions and observations for me...
1. You can get attacked 10 times in a row, then you are immune to attacks for X amount of hours after.
What time span between attacks count towards this 10 times in a row?
How many hours after are you immune to attacks?
2. How much money do you need to not bank because its not economical?
The max you can get from one attack is $30,000 (in other words if you had $300,000 and lost attacks, you can loose 10% of it each attack and be left with nothing!).
The bank takes 10% of your total.
I would think you would need 3,000,000 or more on hand to NOT use the bank. Why? The bank takes 10% so...it would eat 300,000. That is the max you can get stolen from an attack. Therefore If you collect from your buildings and your over 3,000,000 i would think banking would not be economical.
If you collected from your buildings and got 4,000,000 do you bank or not? Lets see using the example below;
A) $4,000,000 deposited in the bank
Bank eats 10% therefore its a $400,000 Loss
$3,600,000 total in the bank
B) $4,000,000 on hand and you get attacked AND LOOSE 10 times
$30,000 per loss is maximum currently
$300,000 total loss
$3,700,000 total on hand
Conclusion:
Anything under $3,000,000 you should probably bank always to prevent stolen money from attacks.
Anything over $3,000,000 you should probably not use the bank.
Agree? Disagree? Lets Discuss!