Battle Results On Android Show "W:1 L:0", Results On IOS Correct

[abnugget]

Battle results currently appear as "W:1 L:0" on Android devices. On IOS devices the correct Battle results are shown.


*EDIT* Appears this graphical error only appears when a battle is active. Once the battle is finished the correct battle results are posted, but once battle is declared again result goes back to 1-0

[Vile Lynn]

Are the goal tallies correct?

[Mrs Cash]

Shows correctly on my 2 Android devices, and we are 0-1.

EDIT
Well, I stand corrected, it did say 0-1, and now says 1-0. Too bad the goal doesn't take that stat...

[abnugget]

@V Syndicate goals tallied correctly. I'm in 3 different Syndicates and all three results appear as "W:1 L:0" currently. Asked a few people in chats and appears not all Android are affected the same, but others are also reporting same problem. Just thought I'd say something because Sirius has actually listened on here recently :)

[Evan1000]

What I also found funny is you need 22 wins for streaks according to the screenshot, and there's only 23 possible matches, since it's a 23 hour event. But to get 23 matches your would need to declare exactly when the event starts, and get an instant match every time you press the button.. so really 22 possible matchups

[Vile Lynn]

What I also found funny is you need 22 wins for streaks according to the screenshot, and there's only 23 possible matches, since it's a 23 hour event. But to get 23 matches your would need to declare exactly when the event starts, and get an instant match every time you press the button.. so really 22 possible matchups

So, what's the problem?

23 hours to win 22 hour-long matches? Sounds as difficult as it should be.

[Evan1000]

So, what's the problem?

23 hours to win 22 hour-long matches? Sounds as difficult as it should be.

That is going back to back during night hours, and getting quick matchups, and not a single mistake or loss. For most syns this is very hard to do.

I only know of two syns who finished streaking, and you can guess who those are.

And all for an 8% mod and a wins prize without one.

[Vile Lynn]

That is going back to back during night hours, and getting quick matchups, and not a single mistake or loss. For most syns this is very hard to do.

I only know of two syns who finished streaking, and you can guess who those are.

And all for an 8% mod and a wins prize without one.

I'm still missing your point...
Are you saying more syndicates should have finished but the goal was too difficult?
Are you feeling entitled again?
Feeling like your "good effort" should be enough to win elite rewards?
Who else besides the top 2 syndicates should have finished?

The goal is fine and intended by design for only 1, maybe 2 syndicates to finish IF they were hardcore enough to go back-to-back the entire 23 hours and win every match. Congrats to them! They EARNED it thru massive gold use and superior teamwork.

Being that 2 syndicates actually finished (as you claim), the goal was not impossible & the matching algorithm was precisely quick.

As I said before, the goal was as difficult as it should have been for only 1 or 2 syndicates to finish. GREE did something right this time.

[bevsxrs]

Reading this thread made my day. Thank you! ;)

[Evan1000]

I am missing your point, and I don't understand why you are defending this.

Out of the thousands of syns, and tens of streak syns (there's not a lot for an obvious reason) only TWO were able to finish. I didn't say it was impossible, but it was so challenging that only TWO syndicates were actually able to finish them.

Challenging goals are one thing, yes congratulations what an accomplishment, and streaks are already challenging to begin with, but goals so challenging that only TWO syndicates were able to complete it (probably because every syn stands down to them) are just absolutely insane, and a stupid choice to make by GREE because streaks are already gold demanding enough and if the streak syns minus two stop streaking GREE loses out on a lot of gold.

[Vile Lynn]

Oh ok... Your point is more syndicates should have finished.
My point is 1 or 2 syndicates finishing was spot on.

Let's agree to disagree. :)